The WTO members have recognized e-commerce issues related to the WTO and started to discuss in the first WTO conference in Singapore in 1996. The trade related issue of tariff on electronic transmission has been raised in the WTO by the United States ...
The WTO members have recognized e-commerce issues related to the WTO and started to discuss in the first WTO conference in Singapore in 1996. The trade related issue of tariff on electronic transmission has been raised in the WTO by the United States who has a vital interest in seeing that the internet is not over-regulated or overtaxed, but allowed to grow and develop at its own pace. A permanent stand-still on digital commerce was agreed to by all members. While the role of the WTO on e-commerce area is increasing as an important actor of global governance, the ability of the WTO has become questionable. Developed countries with far advanced technologies including the Unites States want to consider e-commerce on market principle that brought the e-commerce issues on the multilateral negotiation. They made member states to open their IT industries and its service sector including intellectual property rights. The WTO has sharply divided by each member country's national interest. I argue that the WTO serves developed countries interests, which are lobbied by transnational corporations (TNCs). Even though the WTO's decisions are made by the entire membership, so-called consensus, decisions are influenced and made by TNCs and advanced countries' interest because they are often the providers of services. In this case, the WTO is not a place for where member states come to adopt neoliberal polices but a place to decide what they want for their national interests.