RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      개인, 직무, 관계 측면에서의 결정요인이 직무 크래프팅에 미치는 주효과 및 상호작용효과 = Main and Interaction Effects of Determinants in Individual, Job, and Relational Aspects on Job Crafting

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103801401

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The scholarly and practical focus with regard to job (re)design moves from traditional top-down processes by managers or supervisors to alternative bottom-up processes by employees or subordinates. Researchers have been recently interested in job craf...

      The scholarly and practical focus with regard to job (re)design moves from traditional top-down processes by managers or supervisors to alternative bottom-up processes by employees or subordinates. Researchers have been recently interested in job crafting which represents that organizational members alter the boundaries of their jobs by changing how they perform tasks and expanding the scope of tasks. Previous research has shown that job incumbents in organizations actually tend to engage in job crafting behaviors, and that job crafting contributes to a variety of work outcomes including job attitudes and performance. However, it remains insufficient to identify factors which lead to or facilitate job crafting in the individual level.
      Given that job (re)design research should comprehensively consider the characteristics of jobs, incumbents, and social environments, this study attempted to investigate determinants of job crafting in individual, job, and relational aspects. In particular, the current study hypothesized that job crafting would be positively influenced by proactive personality in the individual aspect, job autonomy in the job aspect, and interpersonal feedback in the relational aspect. It was expected that proactive personality would function as the willingness, job autonomy would serve as the opportunity, and interpersonal feedback would play a role of the competency.
      This study collected data from 208 hotel service employees in Korea. Hierarchical multiple regressions was used to empirically test the hypotheses. The analyzed results indicated that proactive personality in the individual aspect, job autonomy in the job aspect, and interpersonal feedback in the relational aspect significantly had the positive effects on job crafting. In addition, these determinants interacted to affect the extent to which job incumbents engaged in job crafting. In other words, proactive personality had the strongest, positive relationship with job crafting when job autonomy was high and coworkers provided useful feedback.
      The findings of this study suggests implications for scholars and practitioners. Specifically, the present study offers evidence that proactive personality, job autonomy, and interpersonal feedback independently and interactively play pivotal roles in facilitating job crafting behavior as individual job redesign, which suggests that those determinants have main and synergistic effects on job crafting. Furthermore, it proposes that managers or supervisors in contemporary organizations need to change their perspectives on job redesign and to establish conditions for employees or subordinates to redesign job tasks spontaneously. The limitations of this study and the directions for future research are also discussed.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      조직구성원이 자신의 직무 수행 방식과 범위를 자발적으로 변경하는 직무 크래프팅(job crafting)에 대한 학계와 실무계의 관심이 지속적으로 높아지고 있다. 그러나 어떤 요인들로 인하여 개...

      조직구성원이 자신의 직무 수행 방식과 범위를 자발적으로 변경하는 직무 크래프팅(job crafting)에 대한 학계와 실무계의 관심이 지속적으로 높아지고 있다. 그러나 어떤 요인들로 인하여 개인 수준에서 직무 영역의 변경이 유발 또는 촉진되는지에 대한 체계적인 연구는 활발하게 진행되고 있지 않은 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 개인, 직무, 관계 측면에서 직무 크래프팅 정도를 결정하는 요인을 종합적으로 조사하였다. 국내 호텔의 서비스 담당자 208명을 대상으로 조사한 설문을 토대로 위계적 회귀분석을 시행한 결과, 개인 측면에서의 주도적 성격, 직무 측면에서의 직무 자율성, 관계 측면에서의 대인관계 피드백은 각각 직무 크래프팅에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 이러한 결정요인들은 상호작용하여 직무수행자가 직무 크래프팅에 관여하는 정도를 더욱 높이는 것으로 확인되었다. 본 연구는 직무 크래프팅에 대한 결정요인을 포괄적으로 파악하는 동시에 이들 간의 상호작용효과를 규명한다는 점에서 이론적 의의가 있으며, 직무 크래프팅 촉진을 위한 방향성을 제시한다는 점에서 실무적 시사점을 찾을 수 있다.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 임명기, "한국판 잡 크래프팅 척도(JCQ-K)의 타당화 연구" 한국기업경영학회 21 (21): 181-206, 2014

      2 오종철, "창의적 리더십이 심리적 임파워먼트와 직무만족 및 구성원의 혁신행동에 미치는 영향 -서비스기업을 중심으로-" 한국기업경영학회 17 (17): 131-148, 2010

      3 정재호, "사업부제조직을 채택한 다국적기업의 분권화에 관한 이론과 사례연구" 한국기업경영학회 17 (17): 23-39, 2010

      4 김창호, "리더의 진실성이 부하의 장인적 직무수행(Job Crafting)에 미치는 영향과 그 과정에 대한 연구" 한국인사관리학회 36 (36): 131-162, 2012

      5 이학식, "구조방정식 모형분석과 AMOS 16. 0" 법문사 2009

      6 Hackman, J. R., "Work Redesign" Addison-Wesley 1980

      7 Leana, C., "Work Process and Quality of Care in Early Childhood Education: The Role of Job Crafting" 52 (52): 1169-1192, 2009

      8 Zhou, J., "When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity : Encouraging the Expression of Voice" 44 (44): 682-696, 2001

      9 Morgeson, F. P., "The Work Design Questionnaire(WDQ) : Developing and Validating a Comprehensive Measure for Assessing Job Design and the Nature of Work" 91 (91): 1321-1339, 2006

      10 Crant, J. M., "The Proactive Personality Scale and Objective Job Performance among Real Estate Agents" 80 (80): 532-537, 1995

      1 임명기, "한국판 잡 크래프팅 척도(JCQ-K)의 타당화 연구" 한국기업경영학회 21 (21): 181-206, 2014

      2 오종철, "창의적 리더십이 심리적 임파워먼트와 직무만족 및 구성원의 혁신행동에 미치는 영향 -서비스기업을 중심으로-" 한국기업경영학회 17 (17): 131-148, 2010

      3 정재호, "사업부제조직을 채택한 다국적기업의 분권화에 관한 이론과 사례연구" 한국기업경영학회 17 (17): 23-39, 2010

      4 김창호, "리더의 진실성이 부하의 장인적 직무수행(Job Crafting)에 미치는 영향과 그 과정에 대한 연구" 한국인사관리학회 36 (36): 131-162, 2012

      5 이학식, "구조방정식 모형분석과 AMOS 16. 0" 법문사 2009

      6 Hackman, J. R., "Work Redesign" Addison-Wesley 1980

      7 Leana, C., "Work Process and Quality of Care in Early Childhood Education: The Role of Job Crafting" 52 (52): 1169-1192, 2009

      8 Zhou, J., "When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity : Encouraging the Expression of Voice" 44 (44): 682-696, 2001

      9 Morgeson, F. P., "The Work Design Questionnaire(WDQ) : Developing and Validating a Comprehensive Measure for Assessing Job Design and the Nature of Work" 91 (91): 1321-1339, 2006

      10 Crant, J. M., "The Proactive Personality Scale and Objective Job Performance among Real Estate Agents" 80 (80): 532-537, 1995

      11 Becherer, R. C., "The Proactive Personality Disposition and Entrepreneurial Behavior among Small Company Presidents" 37 (37): 28-36, 1999

      12 Bateman, T. S., "The Proactive Component of Organizational Behavior" 14 (14): 103-118, 1993

      13 Blumberg, M., "The Missing Opportunity in Organizational Research: Some Implications for a Theory of Work Performance" 7 (7): 560-569, 1982

      14 Slemp, G. R., "The Job Crafting Questionnaire : A New Scale to Measure the Extent to Which Employees Engage in Job Crafting" 3 (3): 126-146, 2013

      15 Birdi, K., "The Impact of Human Resource and Operational Management Practices on Company Productivity: A Longitudinal Study" 61 (61): 467-501, 2008

      16 Lyons, P., "The Crafting of Jobs and Individual Differences" 23 (23): 25-36, 2008

      17 Axtell, C. M., "Shop Floor Innovation: Facilitating the Suggestion and Implementation of ideas" 73 (73): 265-285, 2000

      18 Ghitulescu, B. E., "Shaping Tasks and Relationships at Work: Examining the Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Job Crafting" University of Pittsburgh 2007

      19 Grant, A. M., "Redesigning Work Design Theories" 3 (3): 317-375, 2009

      20 Dawson, J. F., "Probing Three-Way Interactions in Moderated Multiple Regression : Development and Application of a Slope Difference Test" 91 (91): 917-926, 2006

      21 Bakker, A. B., "Proactive Personality and Job Performance : The Role of Job Crafting and Work Engagement" 65 (65): 1359-1378, 2012

      22 Thompson, J. A., "Proactive Personality and Job Performance : A Social Capital Perspective" 90 (90): 1011-1017, 2005

      23 Seibert, S. E., "Proactive Personality and Career Success" 84 (84): 416-427, 1999

      24 Crant, J. M., "Proactive Behavior in Organizations" 26 (26): 435-462, 2000

      25 Frese, M., "Personal Initiative : An Active Performance Concept for Work in the 21st Century" 23 : 133-187, 2001

      26 Berg, J. M., "Perceiving and Responding to Challenges in Job Crafting at Different Ranks: When Proactivity Requires Adaptivity" 31 (31): 158-186, 2010

      27 Jackson, P. R., "New Measures of Job Control, Cognitive Demand, and Production Responsibility" 78 (78): 753-762, 1993

      28 Hair, Jr., J. F., "Multivariate Data Analysis:A Global Perspective" Pearson 2010

      29 Aiken, L., "Multiple Regression:Testing and Interpreting Interactions" Sage 1991

      30 Allison, P. D., "Multiple Regression: A Primer" Pine Forge Press 1999

      31 Parker, S. K., "Modeling the Antecedents of Proactive Behavior at Work" 91 (91): 636-652, 2006

      32 Parker, S. K., "Minimizing Strain and Maximizing Learning : The Role of Job Demands, Job Control, and Proactive Personality" 84 (84): 925-939, 1999

      33 Parker, S. K., "Making Things Happen : A Model of Proactive Motivation" 36 (36): 827-856, 2010

      34 Morgeson, F. P., "Job and Team Design: Toward a More Integrative Conceptualization of Work Design" 27 : 39-91, 2008

      35 Tims, M., "Job Crafting : Towards a New Model of Individual Job Redesign" 36 (36): 1-9, 2010

      36 Coelho, F., "Job Characteristics and the Creativity of Frontline Service Employees" 13 (13): 426-438, 2010

      37 Humphrey, S. E., "Integrating Motivational, Social, and Contextual Work Design Features:A Meta-Analytic Summary and Theoretical Extension of the Work Design Literature" 92 (92): 1332-1356, 2007

      38 Earley, P. C., "Impact of Process and Outcome Feedback on the Relation of Goal Setting to Task Performance" 33 (33): 87-105, 1990

      39 Van Dyne, L., "Helping and Voice Extra-Role Behaviors : Evidence of Construct and Predictive Validity" 41 (41): 108-119, 1998

      40 Ilgen, D. R., "Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2" Consulting Psychology Press 165-207, 1991

      41 Graen, G, "Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology" Rand McNally College 1201-1245, 1976

      42 Agnihotri, R., "Examining the Drivers and Performance Implications of Boundary Spanner Creativity" 17 (17): 164-181, 2014

      43 Parker, S. K., "Enhancing Role Breath Self-Efficacy : The Roles of Job Enrichment and Other Organizational Interventions" 83 (83): 835-852, 1998

      44 Wrzesniewski, A., "Crafting a Job : Revisioning Employees as Active Crafters of Their Work" 26 (26): 179-201, 2001

      45 Podsakoff, P. M., "Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research : A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies" 88 (88): 879-903, 2003

      46 Cohen, J., "Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences" Erlbaum 2003

      47 Demerouti, E, "An Introduction to Contemporary Work Psychology" Wiley-Blackwell 415-433, 2014

      48 Cohen, S. G., "A Predictive Model of Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness" 49 (49): 643-676, 1996

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-03-13 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korean Corporation Management Association KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.56 1.56 1.63
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.75 1.7 2.494 0.42
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼