Two intervals of exceptionally strong recurrence of galactic cosmic ray (GCR) intensity at solar rotation period stand out in recent history, one in 2007–2008 and the other in 2014–2015. We use neutron monitor data from Oulu and Hermanus, solar wi...
Two intervals of exceptionally strong recurrence of galactic cosmic ray (GCR) intensity at solar rotation period stand out in recent history, one in 2007–2008 and the other in 2014–2015. We use neutron monitor data from Oulu and Hermanus, solar wind (SW) data, and coronal images to study these intervals. We find that in both cases the source of solar rotation period recurrence was a coronal hole (CH), but CH structures were different. While a large, longitudinally asymmetric CH existed at high southern latitudes in 2014–2015, a low‐latitude CH caused the recurrence in 2007–2008. Spectral properties of GCR and SW parameters reflect these differences. In 2014–2015 the GCR power spectrum density was broad and peaked at a period of 28.9 days, longer than the simultaneous recurrence period of SW speed. In 2007–2008 the GCR power spectrum was narrow and peaked at 27.5 days, exactly the same as for SW speed. The effect of CHs to GCRs was somewhat different in the two cases because of opposite solar polarities in the two intervals. In 2014–2015, during positive polarity when GCRs drift inward from high latitudes, the convection of fast SW from CH reduces the inward GCR drift over a wide range of high heliolatitudes at certain heliolongitudes. In 2007–2008, during negative polarity when GCRs drift inward via the heliospheric current sheet, a low‐latitude CH depletes the GCR flux not only by convection but also by the deflecting heliospheric current sheet away from the ecliptic, whence GCR drift to higher latitudes in a limited longitude range.
We compare two intervals of exceptionally strong GCR recurrence at solar rotation period, one in 2007–2008 and the other in 2014–2015
In both cases the source of solar rotation period recurrence was a coronal hole, but the coronal holes were located quite differently
The effect of the coronal hole to GCR intensity was different because of opposite solar polarities during the two intervals