RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Are Function Words Functioning Well? A Corpus-based Investigation of Function Words in Different Qualities of L2 English Argumentative Essays

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104738304

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Based on extensive studies of the value of function words in language use, this research examined the relationship between native like frequency of function words and L2 writing quality. Through a keyword analysis of Korean students' L2 English writing corpus, this study identified ten function words that showed a distinctive frequency in a learner corpus in comparison to a native speaker corpus. In particular, this study examined the use of function words, which showed native like frequency in advanced L2 writing, hinting at the potential of function words as indicators of overall writing quality. The findings of this study suggested that the use of first person pronouns (I, my), conjunctive adverbs (so, because, but, as), the proverb do, articles (the, a/an), and the preposition of showed native like frequency in more advanced L2 writing. Qualitative examination of the function words revealed that basic level writing showed a stronger degree of writer visibility and a higher dependency on a limited range of lexical devices to deliver causal and contrastive semantics. It is hoped that this study invites more academic and instructional attention to the use of function words in L2 writing pedagogy and provokes further investigation of L2 learners’ use of function words.
      번역하기

      Based on extensive studies of the value of function words in language use, this research examined the relationship between native like frequency of function words and L2 writing quality. Through a keyword analysis of Korean students' L2 English writin...

      Based on extensive studies of the value of function words in language use, this research examined the relationship between native like frequency of function words and L2 writing quality. Through a keyword analysis of Korean students' L2 English writing corpus, this study identified ten function words that showed a distinctive frequency in a learner corpus in comparison to a native speaker corpus. In particular, this study examined the use of function words, which showed native like frequency in advanced L2 writing, hinting at the potential of function words as indicators of overall writing quality. The findings of this study suggested that the use of first person pronouns (I, my), conjunctive adverbs (so, because, but, as), the proverb do, articles (the, a/an), and the preposition of showed native like frequency in more advanced L2 writing. Qualitative examination of the function words revealed that basic level writing showed a stronger degree of writer visibility and a higher dependency on a limited range of lexical devices to deliver causal and contrastive semantics. It is hoped that this study invites more academic and instructional attention to the use of function words in L2 writing pedagogy and provokes further investigation of L2 learners’ use of function words.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Rhee, S. C., "Yonsei English Learner Corpus" Yonsei University 26-36, 2012

      2 Kirkman, R. E., "Writing well: Ten commandments for educators" 58 (58): 61-68, 1980

      3 McCrostie, J., "Writer visibility in EFL learner academic writing: A corpus‐based study" 32 : 97-114, 2008

      4 Neininger, B., "Word‐category specific deficits after lesions in the right hemisphere" 41 (41): 53-70, 2003

      5 Aitchison, J., "Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon" Blackwell 2003

      6 Pulvermüller, F., "Words in the brains’ language" 22 : 253-336, 1999

      7 Scott, M., "WordSmith tools (version 5)" Lexical Analysis Software Ltd 2008

      8 Toma, C., "What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles" 62 : 78-97, 2012

      9 Laufer, B., "Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2written production" 16 (16): 307-322, 1995

      10 Biber, D., "Variation across speech and writing" Cambridge University Press 1988

      1 Rhee, S. C., "Yonsei English Learner Corpus" Yonsei University 26-36, 2012

      2 Kirkman, R. E., "Writing well: Ten commandments for educators" 58 (58): 61-68, 1980

      3 McCrostie, J., "Writer visibility in EFL learner academic writing: A corpus‐based study" 32 : 97-114, 2008

      4 Neininger, B., "Word‐category specific deficits after lesions in the right hemisphere" 41 (41): 53-70, 2003

      5 Aitchison, J., "Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon" Blackwell 2003

      6 Pulvermüller, F., "Words in the brains’ language" 22 : 253-336, 1999

      7 Scott, M., "WordSmith tools (version 5)" Lexical Analysis Software Ltd 2008

      8 Toma, C., "What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles" 62 : 78-97, 2012

      9 Laufer, B., "Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2written production" 16 (16): 307-322, 1995

      10 Biber, D., "Variation across speech and writing" Cambridge University Press 1988

      11 Chan, A., "Toward a taxonomy of written errors: Investigation into the written errors of Hong Kong Cantonese ESL learners" 44 (44): 295-319, 2010

      12 Gilquin, G., "Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation" 1 (1): 41-61, 2008

      13 Hinkel, E., "The use of modal verbs as a reflection of cultural values" 29 (29): 325-343, 1995

      14 Pennebaker, J. W., "The secret life of pronouns: What our words say about us" Bloomsbury Press 2012

      15 Hinkel, E., "The effects of essay topics on modal verb uses in L1 and L2academic writing" 41 : 667-683, 2009

      16 Bitchener, J., "The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing" 14 (14): 191-205, 2005

      17 Trademan, J., "The acquisition of the English article system by native speakers of Spanish and Japanese: A cross-linguistic comparison" University of New Mexico 2002

      18 Ting, H. C., "The acquisition of articles in L2 English by L1 Chinese and L1Spanish speakers" University of Essex 2005

      19 Thomas, M., "The acquisition of English articles by first and second language learners of English" 10 : 335-355, 1989

      20 Milton, J., "Studies in lexis: Working papers from a seminar" Hong Kong University of Science & Technology Language Center 215-246, 1993

      21 Ionin, T., "Sources of linguistic knowledge in the second language acquisition of English articles" 118 (118): 554-576, 2008

      22 Schmidt, R., "Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition" Newbury House 137-174, 1983

      23 Chung, C., "Social commutation" Psychology Press 343-359, 2007

      24 Hyland, K., "Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’writing" 6 (6): 183-205, 1997

      25 Granger, S., "Phraseology: Theory, analysis and applications" Oxford University Press 145-160, 1998

      26 Hyland, K., "Options of identity in academic writing" 56 (56): 351-358, 2002

      27 Koppel, M., "Measuring differentiability:Unmasking pseudonymous authors" 8 : 1261-1276, 2007

      28 Lee, D., "Making a bigger deal of the smaller words: Function words and other key items in research writing by Chinese learners" 18 (18): 149-165, 2009

      29 Newman, M. L., "Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles" 29 : 665-675, 2003

      30 Broca, P. P., "Loss of speech, chronic softening and partial destruction of the anterior left lobe of the brain" 2 : 235-238, 1861

      31 Macalister, J., "Listening to proper nouns: Social change and Maori proper noun use in New Zealand English" 18 : 24-34, 2004

      32 Mohr, H., "Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentaion of fucntion words, content words and non‐words: Evidemce of interhemispheric interaction" 32 (32): 105-129, 1994

      33 Petch‐Tyson, S., "Learner English on computer" Addison Wesley Longman 107-118, 1998

      34 Ringbom, H., "Learner English on computer" Addison Wesley Longman 41-52, 1998

      35 Granger, S., "Learner English on computer" Longman 1998

      36 Granger, S., "LOCNESS: Louvain corpus of native English" Universitaires de Louvain

      37 강대민, "Korean EFL Listeners' Identification of Function and Content Words" 한국응용언어학회 25 (25): 97-121, 2009

      38 Breeze, R., "How personal is this text? Researching writer and reader presence in student writing using wordsmith tools" 1 : 14-21, 2007

      39 Rosenberg, B., "Grammatical class effects in relation to normal and aphasic sentence processing" 26 (26): 287-303, 1985

      40 Tribble, C., "Genres, keywords, teaching: Towards a pedagogic account of the language of project proposals. In Rethinking language pedagogy from a corpus perspective"

      41 Monroe, B., "Fightin’ words: Lexical feature selection and evaluation for identifying the content of political conflict" 32 : 20-45, 2008

      42 Ringbom, H., "Explorations in corpus linguistics" Rodopi 191-200, 1999

      43 Zhao, Y., "Effective and scalable authorship attribution using function words" 3689 : 174-189, 2005

      44 Wernicke, C., "Der aphasische symptomencomplex: Ein psychologische studie auf anatomischer basis" Cohn & Weigert 1874

      45 Saffran, E. M., "Deep dyslexia" Routledge &Kegan Paul 381-406, 1980

      46 Eastman, J. K., "C‐words and F‐words : The importance of distinguishing content and function in teaching second language listening comprehension" 21 : 495-502, 1993

      47 Granger, S., "Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non‐native EFL speakers of English" 15 (15): 17-27, 1996

      48 Aijmer, K., "Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching" John Benjamins 55-76, 2002

      49 Snape, N., "Comparing Chinese, Japanese and Spanish speakers in L2 English article acquisition: Evidence against the fluctuation hypothesis?" Cascadilla Proceedings Project 132-139, 2006

      50 Field, J., "Brick or mortar: Which parts of the input does a second language listener rely on?" 42 (42): 411-432, 2008

      51 Izumi E., "Automatic error detection in the Japanese learners’ English spoken data" 145-148, 2003

      52 Koppel, M., "Authorship attribution with thousands of candidate authors" ACM Press 659-660, 2006

      53 Diederich, J., "Authorship attribution with support vector machines" 19 (19): 109-123, 2003

      54 Ionin, T., "Article semantics in second language acquisition" MIT 2003

      55 Ionin, T., "Article semantics in L1 acquisition: The roles of specificity" 12 (12): 3-69, 2004

      56 Cobb, T., "Analyzing late interlanguage with learner corpora: Quebec replications of three European studies" 59 (59): 393-424, 2003

      57 Hawkins, R., "Accounting for English article interpretation by L2speakers" 6 (6): 7-25, 2006

      58 Aijmer, K., "A wealth of English: Studies in honour of Göran Kjellme" Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis 247-257, 2001

      59 Biber, D., "A corpus‐driven approach to formulaic language in English:Multi‐word patterns in speech and writing" 14 (14): 277-311, 2009

      60 Van Rooy, B., "A corpus‐based analysis of involved aspects of student writing" 37 (37): 160-182, 2006

      61 Someya, Y., "A corpus-based study of lexical and grammatical features of written business English" University of Tokyo 1999

      62 Neff, J., "A contrastive functional analysis of errors in Spanish EFL university writers' argumentative texts: Corpus‐based study" 60 (60): 203-225, 2006

      63 Field, Y., "A comparison of internal conjunctive cohesion in the English essay writing of Cantonese speakers and native speakers of English" 23 (23): 15-28, 1992

      64 윤현숙, "A Corpus-based Analysis of Connectors in Korean Students' Essay Writing" 한국응용언어학회 22 (22): 159-178, 2006

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.65 0.65 0.67
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.76 0.75 1.472 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼