地方議會의 政策主導力에 관한 硏究 : 慶尙北道議會와 大邱廣域市議會를 中心으로 = (A) study on the policy initiative of local council : cases of Kyongsangbuk-Do council and Tague Metropolitan city council

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

After the execution of local autonomy, the power structure of local society has been changed greatly centering around local council and the provincial governor · the mayor elected by the residents. Under local autonomy, the central government can not dictate the policies of the local community nor can it exact obedience from residents. Instead local residents participate directly in the formation of policies that affect their welfare.
However, it is still uncertain whether or not residents pluralistic benefit is well reflected in the process of local government policy decision-making or whether or not, the members of the local council are performing their duties of shaping the public opinion and mediating disputes between the interested parties.
Starting with these problems, this study will appraise the policy initiative of local council in the policy-making process for community, investigate problems, and also explore ways to strengthen the policy initiative.
First, this study analyzes the policy of the unification of small-sized schools and the enactment of regulations about the committee of the second establishment of the country. Both of these cases were surveyed in two regions and resulted in responses of resistance from the residents. Then the case about the establishment of Kyongbuk provincial college and the policy of Wichon industrial complex construction in Taegu metropolitan city are presented as good examples of a local council's affirmative activity.
Research surveys of local council members who participated in each policy was carried out. An area comparative study of province of Kyongsangbuk-Do and Taegu metropolitan city was conducted.
The theoretical framework for this study is inferred from elitism, pluralism, growth machine and regime theory among community power structure theory. Generally in plural power structure theory, the policy initiative of local council is more powerful.
It appraises the influence of local council and highlights the problems in the policy decision-making structure, through interaction to those policies by local council, the administrative organizations, the central government, political parties, residents, mass media and citizens associations.
Consequently, the result of the study shows that local councils make decisions mostly in deference to the administrative organizations intention, and therefore there are many problems in its role and actions. It is found that the policy decision-making structure of local government is unitary and that participants are limited. In Taegu metropolitan city, the application of pluralism is easier than in province of Kyongsangbuk-Do, a rural community. In a rural community, social relationships are formed by the first group (blood ties, territorial ties, scholastic ties), and so the information network is limited.
That means there is no difference in local politics at this point in the autonomy system because self-regulation has been lost due to a the long continuance of a centralized administration. The present autonomy is in great want of restraints on the provincial governor · the mayor of the local community and causes the inequal redistribution of community power. Therefore the policy initiative of the local council should be strengthened.
To strengthen the policy initiative of local council, the pluralism of the power structure in local society is necessary. The more the policy decision-making process is decentralizational and candid, the more the role of local council will expand. Therefore the pluralism of power structure is a precondition for the fair policy decision-making. It will strengthen the policy initiative of local council and prevent an unfair policy decision-making favorable to a specific group.
As a concrete method of strengthening the policy initiative, the local council's inspection and supervision rights should be reinforced. The policy decision-making process of the local government should be converted to participant system. The scope of policy decision-making by the local council should be expanded. Also the improvement of council office and the specialization of support personnel of the local council are urgently needed. The information network currently through personal networks should be developed into a more plural one. But the most important thing is the policy decision-making ability of local council members which should be supported by specialized support programs.
The purpose of this study was the investigation of local council's phase in the policy process of local government through the community power structure theory of local society, but it may have some limits. It examined only the official policies which were treated in local council because of the difficulties of obtaining materials from all in the community. Also it appraises only the cases of province of Kyongsangbuk-Do and Taegu metropolitan city. Research surveys were made only to council members and council records are referred. So it has the limit biased to specific region and council.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次 = ⅰ
• 第1章 序論 = 1
• 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
• 第2節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 3
• 1. 硏究의 範圍 = 3
• 2. 硏究의 方法 = 5
• 第2章 地域社會 權力構造와 地方議會에 관한 理論的 考察 = 8
• 第1節 地方議會와 地域社會의 權力構造 = 8
• 1. 地域社會 權力構造의 意義 = 8
• 2. 엘리트론(Elitism)과 多元論(Pluralism) = 12
• 3. 成長聯合(Growth machine)과 레짐이론(Regime Theory) = 22
• 4. 權力構造理論의 示唆點 = 28
• 第2節 地方議會의 政策主導力에 관한 論議 = 30
• 1. 地域社會 權力構造에 관한 先行硏究 = 30
• 2. 地域社會 權力構造와 韓國地方議會의 政策主導力 = 39
• 第3節 硏究分析의 틀 = 41
• 第3章 韓圃 地方議會의 構造的 特性과 機能 = 44
• 第1節 地方議會와 政策過程 = 44
• 1. 地方政府의 權力構造와 地方議會 = 44
• 2. 地方政策의 主體와 政策過程 = 48
• 第2節 韓國 地方議會의 構造的 機能 = 52
• 1. 韓國 地方議會의 機能 = 52
• 2. 韓國 地方議會의 構造 = 55
• 3. 地方議會의 政策決定 實態 = 63
• 第4章 地方政策過程에서 地方議會의 政策主導力 分析 = 65
• 第1節 調査의 設計 = 65
• 1. 調査의 目的과 對象 = 65
• 2. 調査의 方法과 節次 = 66
• 3. 調査對象 地方議會의 特性 = 69
• 1) 地方議會의 人的 特性 = 69
• 2) 地方議員의 社會的 關係 = 76
• 第2節 地方政府의 政策過程에서 地方議會의 政策主導 實態 = 87
• 1. 小規模學校統廢合政策 事例 = 87
• 1) 政策의 槪要 및 展開過程 = 87
• 2) 爭點 分折 = 92
• 3) 地方議會의 認識 = 95
• 4) 地方議會의 政策主導力 評價 = 98
• 2. 第2建國委員會條例制定 事例 = 101
• 1) 政策의 槪要 및 展開過程 = 101
• 2) 爭點 分析 = 105
• 3) 地方議會의 認識 = 107
• 4) 地方議會의 政策主導力 評價 = 111
• 3. 道立專門大學設立의 事例 = 113
• 1) 政策의 槪要 및 展開過程 = 113
• 2) 爭點 分析 = 117
• 3) 地方議會의 認識 = 118
• 4) 地方議會의 政策主導力 評價 = 120
• 4. 渭川工團造成政策의 事例 = 122
• 1) 政策의 槪要 및 展開過程 = 122
• 2) 爭點 分析 = 126
• 3) 地方議會의 認識 = 128
• 4) 地方議會의 政策主導力 評價 = 129
• 第3節 分析의 綜合 및 示唆點 = 132
• 1. 團體長中心의 權力構造 = 134
• 2. 中央政府에 대한 隸屬性 = 138
• 3. 地方政治의 不在와 歸屬主義 政治 = 140
• 第5章 地方議會의 政策主導力 强化方案 = 143
• 第1節 地方政府의 政策決定過程과 構造의 改善 = 143
• 1. 團體長 中心의 權力構造 緩和 = 143
• 2. 參與的 政策決定體制로의 轉換 = 147
• 3. 地力議會의 權限 强化 = 151
• 第2節 議政活動支援體制의 强化 = 153
• 1. 議會事務處 組織의 改善 = 153
• 2. 議會支援人力의 專門化 = 155
• 第3節 地方議員의 政策決定能力 向上 = 157
• 1. 議員 情報網의 多樣化 = 157
• 2. 議員의 政策決定 能力 開發 = 158
• 第6章 結論 = 161
• 참고문헌 = 166
• ABSTRACT = 175
• 附錄 - 質間紙 = 179