RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      보호관찰청소년과 일반청소년의 진로자기효능감, 진로결정수준 진로준비행동 비교 = The comparison of the career self-efficacy, career decision level and career preparation behavior between the Juveniles Probation and average adolescents.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12011828

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        전주 : 전북대학교 대학원, 2010

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(석사) -- 전북대학교 대학원 , 교육학(교육학) , 2010. 2

      • 발행연도

        2010

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • 발행국(도시)

        전북특별자치도

      • 형태사항

        v, 63 p. : 삽화 ; 26cm

      • 일반주기명

        전북대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
        지도교수:임은미
        참고문헌 : p.44-53

      • 소장기관
        • 전북대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study was to compare with 2 groups in order to see the differences of the career self- efficacy, career decision level and career preparation behavior. The research was performed as below; 114 Juveniles in probation and 147 average adolescents ...

      This study was to compare with 2 groups in order to see the differences of the career self- efficacy, career decision level and career preparation behavior.
      The research was performed as below;
      114 Juveniles in probation and 147 average adolescents were picked and tested the questionaries of career self- efficacy, career decision level and career preparation behavior. These questionaries were gathered and analyzed by SPSS 12.0 statistics package. And the differences of 2 groups were conducted by F Verification Average Comparison.
      The results of this study are following;
      First, there were not any meaningful differences of the career self- efficacy between Juveniles in probation and average adolescents. This study showed that everyone in 2 groups collected the information of their career, planed what to do with their goal setting and made their efforts and estimated themselves.
      Second, there were not any differences in their recognition of career decision level of between Juveniles in probation and average adolescents. This study represented that all in 2 groups confirmed the trouble factors of career decision level, experienced conflicts, found out information about career and had serious attitude for it.
      Third, there was a meaningful difference in career preparation behavior between Juveniles in probation and average adolescents. In this study, Juveniles in probation were more prepared for career preparation behavior than average adolescents. The reason of this results seems to be effects of programs which Probation Center ran during probation for Juveniles in probation. Also, Juveniles in probation knew the needs of career, got information about career and tried to get a certificate or license.
      To sum up, there were not any differences of career self- efficacy, career decision level between Juveniles in probation and average adolescents. However, in the difference of career preparation behavior, Juveniles in probation were higher than average adolescents.
      The hope through this study is to be taken advantages of reference in making a program that guides juveniles in difficulties during career development.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
      • 2. 연구문제 5
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
      • 1. 보호관찰청소년
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
      • 2. 연구문제 5
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
      • 1. 보호관찰청소년
      • 가. 보호관찰청소년의 개념 6
      • 나. 보호관찰청소년의 특성 7
      • 다. 보호관찰청소년의 진로발달 9
      • 2. 진로자기효능감
      • 가. 진로자기효능감의 개념 12
      • 나. 보호관찰청소년과 일반청소년의 진로자기효능감 13
      • 3. 진로결정수준
      • 가. 진로결정수준의 개념 16
      • 나. 보호관찰청소년과 일반청소년의 진로결정수준 18
      • 4. 진로준비행동
      • 가. 진로준비행동의 개념 20
      • 나. 보호관찰청소년과 일반청소년의 진로준비행동 21
      • Ⅲ. 연구방법
      • 1. 연구대상 24
      • 2. 연구도구 24
      • 3. 연구절차 30
      • 4. 자료분석 30
      • Ⅳ. 연구결과
      • 1. 보호관찰청소년과 일반청소년의 자기효능감 비교 31
      • 2. 보호관찰청소년과 일반청소년의 진로결정수준 비교 35
      • 3. 보호관찰청소년과 일반청소년의 진로준비행동 비교 36
      • Ⅴ. 논의 38
      • Ⅵ. 결론 42
      • 참고문헌 44
      • 부록 54
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼