RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재 SCOPUS

      가족 및 비가족 공동경영자 구조와 기업가치 : 경영전략에 따른 공동경영자 구조의 역할 검토 = Firm Value of Family Co-CEOs versus Non-Family Co-CEOs : The Role of Co-CEOs by Business Strategy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106268760

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study examines the association between Co-CEOs structure and firm value. Especially, We examine the differences by Co-CEOs into family and non-family group. In addition, we examine whether Co-CEOs structure has a moderating effect on the relationship between business strategy(Prospector, Defender) and firm value. We find that Co-CEOs structure does not have a significant association with firm value. Furthermore, Co-CEOs structure of family group have a negative effect on firm value while Co-CEOs structure of non-family group have a positive effect on firm value. This implies that Co-CEOs structure of family group can be utilized by executives’ pursuit of private interests such as the purpose of management succession. On the other hand, Co-CEOs structure of non-family group is highly likely to be the strategic purpose of management, there can be positive effects such as mutual monitoring among Co-CEOs or creation of synergy. In addition, We find that the negatively moderating effect of Co-CEOs structure is in the association between business strategy and firm value, which is particularly prominent in family group. This study presents the results of empirical analysis on the relationship between Co-CEOs structure(family and non-family group) and firm value. Based on these results, we show the functional effects of the Co-CEOs structure. Furthermore, it is expected that Co-CEOs structure can enhance firm value and provide useful information for business practice.
      번역하기

      This study examines the association between Co-CEOs structure and firm value. Especially, We examine the differences by Co-CEOs into family and non-family group. In addition, we examine whether Co-CEOs structure has a moderating effect on the relation...

      This study examines the association between Co-CEOs structure and firm value. Especially, We examine the differences by Co-CEOs into family and non-family group. In addition, we examine whether Co-CEOs structure has a moderating effect on the relationship between business strategy(Prospector, Defender) and firm value. We find that Co-CEOs structure does not have a significant association with firm value. Furthermore, Co-CEOs structure of family group have a negative effect on firm value while Co-CEOs structure of non-family group have a positive effect on firm value. This implies that Co-CEOs structure of family group can be utilized by executives’ pursuit of private interests such as the purpose of management succession. On the other hand, Co-CEOs structure of non-family group is highly likely to be the strategic purpose of management, there can be positive effects such as mutual monitoring among Co-CEOs or creation of synergy. In addition, We find that the negatively moderating effect of Co-CEOs structure is in the association between business strategy and firm value, which is particularly prominent in family group. This study presents the results of empirical analysis on the relationship between Co-CEOs structure(family and non-family group) and firm value. Based on these results, we show the functional effects of the Co-CEOs structure. Furthermore, it is expected that Co-CEOs structure can enhance firm value and provide useful information for business practice.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김유진, "최고경영자의 경영권 집중도와 신용등급에 관한 연구" 한국회계학회 27 (27): 95-120, 2018

      2 곽영민, "최고경영자에 대한 경영권 집중화 수준과 기업가치" 한국회계학회 42 (42): 187-226, 2017

      3 지성권, "산업경쟁요인에 따른 경쟁전략과 기업성과간의 관련성 연구" 한국회계학회 38 (38): 1-41, 2013

      4 강형철, "기업집단에서 지배주주 가족에 의한 경영과 기업성과" 한국재무학회 27 (27): 141-176, 2014

      5 원자연, "기업수명주기와 경쟁전략이 성과의 지속성에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 25 (25): 33-65, 2016

      6 박진하, "공동경영자 구조와 투자효율성" 대한경영학회 31 (31): 557-575, 2018

      7 이지연, "공동경영자 구조와 상호견제효과: 이익조정을 중심으로" 한국창업학회 13 (13): 55-84, 2018

      8 김유진, "경영전략이 기업의 사회적 책임 활동과 기업성과 간의 관계에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 27 (27): 127-161, 2018

      9 김유진, "경영전략과 경영자 보상체계의 적합성이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국회계학회 26 (26): 45-72, 2017

      10 O’Toole, J., "When two (or more) heads are better than one: The promise and pitfalls of shared leadership" 44 (44): 65-83, 2002

      1 김유진, "최고경영자의 경영권 집중도와 신용등급에 관한 연구" 한국회계학회 27 (27): 95-120, 2018

      2 곽영민, "최고경영자에 대한 경영권 집중화 수준과 기업가치" 한국회계학회 42 (42): 187-226, 2017

      3 지성권, "산업경쟁요인에 따른 경쟁전략과 기업성과간의 관련성 연구" 한국회계학회 38 (38): 1-41, 2013

      4 강형철, "기업집단에서 지배주주 가족에 의한 경영과 기업성과" 한국재무학회 27 (27): 141-176, 2014

      5 원자연, "기업수명주기와 경쟁전략이 성과의 지속성에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 25 (25): 33-65, 2016

      6 박진하, "공동경영자 구조와 투자효율성" 대한경영학회 31 (31): 557-575, 2018

      7 이지연, "공동경영자 구조와 상호견제효과: 이익조정을 중심으로" 한국창업학회 13 (13): 55-84, 2018

      8 김유진, "경영전략이 기업의 사회적 책임 활동과 기업성과 간의 관계에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 27 (27): 127-161, 2018

      9 김유진, "경영전략과 경영자 보상체계의 적합성이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국회계학회 26 (26): 45-72, 2017

      10 O’Toole, J., "When two (or more) heads are better than one: The promise and pitfalls of shared leadership" 44 (44): 65-83, 2002

      11 Schulze, W. S., "Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms" 18-, 2003

      12 Lang, L. H. P., "Tobin's q, corporate diversification, and firm performance" 102 (102): 1248-1280, 1994

      13 Jensen, M. C., "Theory of firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure" 3 : 305-360, 1976

      14 Ittner, C. D., "The use of performance measures in annual bonus contracts" 72 (72): 231-255, 1997

      15 Jermias, J, "The relative influence of competitive intensity and business strategy on the relationship between financial leverage and performance" 40 (40): 71-86, 2008

      16 Waddock, S. A., "The corporate social performance-financial performance link" 18 (18): 303-319, 1997

      17 Bebchuk, L., "The CEO pay slice" 102 : 199-221, 2011

      18 Cannella, A. A., "Succession as a sociopolitical process: Internal impediments to outsider selection" 36 (36): 763-793, 1993

      19 Fama, E. F., "Separation of ownership and control" 26 (26): 301-325, 1983

      20 Dess, G. F., "Porter’s (1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance" 27 (27): 467-488, 1984

      21 Kandel, E., "Peer pressure and partnerships" 100 : 801-817, 1992

      22 Miles, R. E., "Organizational strategy, structure, and process" Stanford University Press 2003

      23 Miles, R. E., "Organizational strategy, structure, and process" McGraw-Hill 1978

      24 Tobin, J., "Money, credit and capital" Irwin/McGraw-Hill 1998

      25 Bertrand, M., "Mixing family with business: A study of Thai business groups and the families behind them" 88 (88): 466-498, 2008

      26 Bertrand, A. Schoar, "Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies" 118 : 1169-1208, 2003

      27 Cox, J. D, "Managing and monitoring conflicts of interest: Empowering the outside directors with independent counsel" 48 : 1077-1095, 2003

      28 Horngren, C. T., "Management and cost accounting" Prentice Hall 2002

      29 Arena, M. P., "It Takes Two, The Incidence and Effectiveness of Co-CEOs" 46 (46): 385-412, 2011

      30 Morck, R. K., "Inherited wealth, corporate control and economic growth: The Canadian disease" National Bureau of Economic Research 1998

      31 Villalonga, B., "How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?" 80 (80): 385-417, 2006

      32 Fahlenbrach, R, "Founder-CEOs, investment decisions, and stock market performance" 44 (44): 439-466, 2009

      33 March, J. G., "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning" 2 (2): 71-87, 1991

      34 Dennis, S. A., "Dual or Duel: Co-CEOs and firm performance" 15 (15): 1-25, 2009

      35 Black, B. S., "Does corporate governance affect firm’s market value? Evidence from Korea" 22 (22): 366-413, 2006

      36 Banker, R. D., "Does a differentiation strategy lead to more sustainable financial performance than a cost leadership strategy?" 52 (52): 872-896, 2014

      37 Easton, P. D., "Cross-Sectional variation in the stock market response to accounting earnings announcements" 11 (11): 117-141, 1989

      38 Porter, M. E., "Competitive strategy techniques for analyzing industries and competitors" New York 300-, 1980

      39 Tsui, J. S., "CEO Domination, Growth Opportunities, and Their Impact on Audit Fees" 16 : 189-208, 2001

      40 Bentley, K. A., "Business strategy, financial reporting irregularities, and audit effort" 30 (30): 780-817, 2013

      41 Rhee, M., "Aligning operations, marketing, and competitive strategies to enhance performance: An empirical test in the retail banking industry" 34 (34): 505-515, 2006

      42 McConnell, J., "Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value" 27 (27): 595-612, 1990

      43 Fahy, J, "A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment" 11 : 57-78, 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.96 1.96 2.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.65 2.74 5.829 0.22
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼