RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Chief Executive Officer Hubris and Corporate Social Responsibility in Korea: Moderating Role of Corporate Governance

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106052667

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The corporate social responsibility has become an industry norm, and the majority of companies have adopted corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities due to institutional pressure. This paper suggests that chief executive officer (CEO) characteristics and governance mechanisms such as CEOs hubris, outside directors, and foreign ownership can influence a managerial decision of following the norm in adopting CSR. This paper argues that a CEO with hubris carry out CSR considerably less or more than a CEO without hubris because a CEO with hubris are known to have a tendency to refuse to follow the norm from institutional pressure. On the contrary, corporate governance mechanisms can guide a CEO to follow the industrial norm related to CSR because governance mechanisms tend to control CEO to reduce managerial uncertainty. The results show that CEO with hubris has a positive relationship with the degree of CSR deviation while governance mechanisms have a negative relationship. In addition, governance mechanisms negatively moderate the relationship between CEO with hubris and with the degree of CSR deviation.
      번역하기

      The corporate social responsibility has become an industry norm, and the majority of companies have adopted corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities due to institutional pressure. This paper suggests that chief executive officer (CEO) characte...

      The corporate social responsibility has become an industry norm, and the majority of companies have adopted corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities due to institutional pressure. This paper suggests that chief executive officer (CEO) characteristics and governance mechanisms such as CEOs hubris, outside directors, and foreign ownership can influence a managerial decision of following the norm in adopting CSR. This paper argues that a CEO with hubris carry out CSR considerably less or more than a CEO without hubris because a CEO with hubris are known to have a tendency to refuse to follow the norm from institutional pressure. On the contrary, corporate governance mechanisms can guide a CEO to follow the industrial norm related to CSR because governance mechanisms tend to control CEO to reduce managerial uncertainty. The results show that CEO with hubris has a positive relationship with the degree of CSR deviation while governance mechanisms have a negative relationship. In addition, governance mechanisms negatively moderate the relationship between CEO with hubris and with the degree of CSR deviation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김은정, "중소기업 CSR에 대한 소비자 기대불일치가 기업 이미지와 구매의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국산업정보학회 20 (20): 95-108, 2015

      2 이영찬, "이해관계자에 대한 사회적 책임활동이 지식경영활동 및 조직성과에 미치는 영향" 한국산업정보학회 13 (13): 83-97, 2008

      3 Campbell, J. L., "Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility" 32 (32): 946-967, 2007

      4 Brammer, S., "Voluntary Social Disclosures by large UK Companies" 13 (13): 86-99, 2004

      5 Jensen, M. C., "Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure" 3 (3): 305-360, 1976

      6 DiMaggio, P. J., "The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Vol. 17)" University of Chicago Press 1991

      7 Powell, W. W., "The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis" University of Chicago Press 2012

      8 DiMaggio, P., "The Iron Cage Revisited : Collective Rationality and Institutional Isomorphism in Organizational Fields" 48 (48): 147-160, 1983

      9 Haniffa, R. M., "The Impact of Culture and Governance on Corporate Social Reporting" 24 (24): 391-430, 2005

      10 Roll, R., "The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers" 197-216, 1986

      1 김은정, "중소기업 CSR에 대한 소비자 기대불일치가 기업 이미지와 구매의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국산업정보학회 20 (20): 95-108, 2015

      2 이영찬, "이해관계자에 대한 사회적 책임활동이 지식경영활동 및 조직성과에 미치는 영향" 한국산업정보학회 13 (13): 83-97, 2008

      3 Campbell, J. L., "Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility" 32 (32): 946-967, 2007

      4 Brammer, S., "Voluntary Social Disclosures by large UK Companies" 13 (13): 86-99, 2004

      5 Jensen, M. C., "Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure" 3 (3): 305-360, 1976

      6 DiMaggio, P. J., "The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Vol. 17)" University of Chicago Press 1991

      7 Powell, W. W., "The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis" University of Chicago Press 2012

      8 DiMaggio, P., "The Iron Cage Revisited : Collective Rationality and Institutional Isomorphism in Organizational Fields" 48 (48): 147-160, 1983

      9 Haniffa, R. M., "The Impact of Culture and Governance on Corporate Social Reporting" 24 (24): 391-430, 2005

      10 Roll, R., "The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers" 197-216, 1986

      11 Pfeffer, J., "The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Approach" Harper and Row Publishers 1978

      12 Johnson, R. A., "The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance" 42 (42): 564-576, 1999

      13 Oh, W. Y., "The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Korea" 104 (104): 283-297, 2011

      14 Ibrahim, N. A., "The Corporate Social Responsiveness Orientation of Board Members : Are there differences between nside and outside directors?" 14 (14): 405-410, 1995

      15 Baysinger, B., "The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control : Effects on Corporate Strategy" 15 (15): 72-87, 1990

      16 Porter, M. E., "The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy" 80 (80): 56-68, 2002

      17 Smith, J, "The Companies with the Best CSR Reputations"

      18 KEJI, "The 20.thcorporate Award of Economic Justice Korea Economic Institute"

      19 Fama, E. F., "Separation of Ownership and Control" 26 (26): 301-325, 1983

      20 Camerer, C., "Overconfidence and Excess Entry : An Experimental Approach" 89 (89): 306-318, 1999

      21 Pfeffer, J., "Management as Symbolic Action : The Creation and Maintenance of Organizational Paradigms" 13 : 1-52, 1981

      22 Denis, D. K., "International Corporate Governance" 38 (38): 1-36, 2003

      23 Brancato, C. K., "Institutional Investors and Corporate Governance: Best Practices for Increasing Corporate Value" Irwin Professional Publishing 1997

      24 D’Aveni, R., "Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Management" New York 1994

      25 Mi Choi, H., "Foreign Board Membership and Firm Value in Korea" 50 (50): 207-233, 2012

      26 Chang, Y. K., "Firm Size and Corporate Social Performance: The Mediating Role of Outside Director Representation" 19 (19): 486-500, 2012

      27 Hayward, M. L., "Explaining the Premiums Paid for Large Acquisitions: Evidence of CEO Hubris"

      28 Jeon, J. Q., "Effects of Foreign Ownership on Payout Policy: Evidence from the Korean Market" 14 (14): 344-375, 2011

      29 Kim, B., "Do Foreign Investors Encourage Value-Enhancing Corporate Risk Taking?" 47 (47): 88-110, 2011

      30 Chun, S., "Differentiation Strategy, CSR, And Real Activities Earnings Management: Evidence From Korea" 33 (33): 669-, 2017

      31 McWilliams, A., "Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective" 26 (26): 117-127, 2001

      32 Chapple, W., "Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A Seven-Country Study of CSR Web Site Reporting" 44 (44): 415-441, 2005

      33 Brønn, P. S., "Corporate Motives for Social Initiative:Legitimacy, Sustainability, or the Bottom Line" 87 : 91-109, 2009

      34 Khan, A., "Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures : Evidence from an Emerging Economy" 114 (114): 207-223, 2013

      35 Hiller, N. J., "Conceptualizing Executive Hubris: the Role of (Hyper) Core Self‐Evaluations in Strategic Decision‐Making" 26 (26): 297-319, 2005

      36 Khanna, T., "Concentrated Corporate Ownership" University of Chicago Press 265-294, 2000

      37 Marquis, C., "Community Isomorphism and Corporate Social Action" 32 (32): 925-945, 2007

      38 Wang, J., "Boards of Directors and Stakeholder Orientation" 11 (11): 115-123, 1992

      39 Johnson, R. A., "Board of Director Involvement in Restructuring: The Effects of Board Versus Managerial Controls and Characteristics" 14 (14): 33-50, 1993

      40 Gul, F. A., "Board Leadership, outside Directors’ Expertise and Voluntary Corporate Disclosures" 23 (23): 351-379, 2004

      41 Zhang, J. Q., "Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility : An Empirical Investigation in the Post Sarbanes-Oxley era" 114 (114): 381-392, 2013

      42 Hayward, M. L., "Believing One's Own Press : The Causes and Consequences of CEO Celebrity" 25 (25): 637-653, 2004

      43 Gehrig, T., "An Information Based Explanation of the Domestic bias in International Equity Investment" 97-109, 1993

      44 Kim, J. W., "An Empirical Study of the Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility Fitness of Small and Medium Enterprise on Corporate Reputation and Purchase Intention" 15 (15): 247-258, 2010

      45 Eisenhardt, K. M., "Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review" 14 (14): 57-74, 1989

      46 Ahmadjian, C. L., "A Clash of Capitalisms : Foreign Shareholders and Corporate Restructuring in 1990s Japan" 70 (70): 451-471, 2005

      47 Wiseman, R. M., "A Behavioral Agency Model of Managerial Risk Taking" 23 (23): 133-153, 1998

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보1차)
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.57 0.57 0.58
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.6 0.6 0.796 0.32
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼