RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      교육과정 정렬에 근거한 중학교 수학과 교육과정 분석 = Analysis of Middle School Mathematics Textbooks and Evaluation Based on Curriculum Alignment

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76541745

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In step with the current circumstances, this study attempted to investigate how well our national level of mathematics education and educational curriculum have been realized. Namely, it was aimed to analyze national level of middle school mathematics, the objectives of educational curriculum and unit teaching of textbooks, academic performance and the degree of alignment. Tyler`s model of evaluation was the major premise and was based on the analysis procedure of English educational curriculum alignment in this study. The results of this study were as follows: First, it has been noted that the degree of reflecting the objectives of educational curriculum into those of unit teaching in textbooks was 68%-85% by field and 73%-76% by level. Second, it has been found that the degree of reflecting the objectives of educational curriculum into the evaluation of academic performance in regional level was 55%-73% by field and 54%-65% by level. Third, it has been demonstrated that the degree of reflecting the objectives of educational curriculum into the evaluation of national level academic performance 26%-46% by field and 27%-44% by level. Fourth, it has been noted that the objectives of educational curriculum and textbook units and the degree of alignment in regional level academic performance were 47%-53% by field and 44%-60% by level and the objectives of educational curriculum and textbook units and the degree of alignment in national level academic performance were 17%-38% by field. Fifth, the number of those that have been established as the objectives of unit teaching in most of textbooks even if not included in the objectives of educational curriculum was 13, and it is necessary to investigate whether they have to be set up as the objectives of educational curriculum.
      번역하기

      In step with the current circumstances, this study attempted to investigate how well our national level of mathematics education and educational curriculum have been realized. Namely, it was aimed to analyze national level of middle school mathematics...

      In step with the current circumstances, this study attempted to investigate how well our national level of mathematics education and educational curriculum have been realized. Namely, it was aimed to analyze national level of middle school mathematics, the objectives of educational curriculum and unit teaching of textbooks, academic performance and the degree of alignment. Tyler`s model of evaluation was the major premise and was based on the analysis procedure of English educational curriculum alignment in this study. The results of this study were as follows: First, it has been noted that the degree of reflecting the objectives of educational curriculum into those of unit teaching in textbooks was 68%-85% by field and 73%-76% by level. Second, it has been found that the degree of reflecting the objectives of educational curriculum into the evaluation of academic performance in regional level was 55%-73% by field and 54%-65% by level. Third, it has been demonstrated that the degree of reflecting the objectives of educational curriculum into the evaluation of national level academic performance 26%-46% by field and 27%-44% by level. Fourth, it has been noted that the objectives of educational curriculum and textbook units and the degree of alignment in regional level academic performance were 47%-53% by field and 44%-60% by level and the objectives of educational curriculum and textbook units and the degree of alignment in national level academic performance were 17%-38% by field. Fifth, the number of those that have been established as the objectives of unit teaching in most of textbooks even if not included in the objectives of educational curriculum was 13, and it is necessary to investigate whether they have to be set up as the objectives of educational curriculum.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 교육인적자원부, "초·중등학교 교육과정(총론)" 대한교과서주식회사 2007b

      2 교육인적자원부, "중학교 수학과 교육과정" 대한교과서주식회사 2007a

      3 교육부, "제7차 교육과정에 따른 중학교 2종도서 검정 기준" 대한교과서주식회사 1999

      4 교육부, "수학과 교육과정" 대한교과서주식회사 1997

      5 강현석, "교육과정-수업-평가를 위한 새로운 분류학: Bloom 교육목표분류학의 개정" 아카데미프레스 2005

      6 김숙, "교육과정 조정에 근거한 중학교 수학 교과서 내용 분석" 한국교육과정학회 2007

      1 교육인적자원부, "초·중등학교 교육과정(총론)" 대한교과서주식회사 2007b

      2 교육인적자원부, "중학교 수학과 교육과정" 대한교과서주식회사 2007a

      3 교육부, "제7차 교육과정에 따른 중학교 2종도서 검정 기준" 대한교과서주식회사 1999

      4 교육부, "수학과 교육과정" 대한교과서주식회사 1997

      5 강현석, "교육과정-수업-평가를 위한 새로운 분류학: Bloom 교육목표분류학의 개정" 아카데미프레스 2005

      6 김숙, "교육과정 조정에 근거한 중학교 수학 교과서 내용 분석" 한국교육과정학회 2007

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Curriculum Studies KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.81 2.81 2.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.65 2.69 3.561 0.48
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼