RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      초기 영국소설의 다원론적 연구 = A Pluralistic Study of Early British Novels

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30002765

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study is an attempt to rediscover Oliver Goldsmith and Jane Austen thru pluralistic and socio-historical approaches and confirm the literary achievements their works made. For the purpose, M.M, Bakhtin’s theory of polyphony, dialogism is utilized. The traditional monolithic ways of seeing things, specifically, the “notorious” new criticism or the mimesis theory have limited these writers’ works to be understood as nothing but idealistic fables with no sense of history. Even though their stories do not directly indict the social conflicts as Crabbe would have done, they supply the readers with the essence of the socio-historical background around their times: as for Goldsmoth, his reformist ideas specially in penitentiary laws, and as for Austen, the class oriented relationship between the characters, the patterns of consumptions and fashions, along with the woman as “the Angel in the Attic” question, etc. And for the tracing of these respects, Austen’s major novels, Emma, Mansfield Park, and Pride and Prejudice, and Goldsmith’s The Vicar of Wakefield are utilized. And all these findings verify Bakhtin’s idea of literary work as reflection and refraction of history.
      번역하기

      This study is an attempt to rediscover Oliver Goldsmith and Jane Austen thru pluralistic and socio-historical approaches and confirm the literary achievements their works made. For the purpose, M.M, Bakhtin’s theory of polyphony, dialogism is utiliz...

      This study is an attempt to rediscover Oliver Goldsmith and Jane Austen thru pluralistic and socio-historical approaches and confirm the literary achievements their works made. For the purpose, M.M, Bakhtin’s theory of polyphony, dialogism is utilized. The traditional monolithic ways of seeing things, specifically, the “notorious” new criticism or the mimesis theory have limited these writers’ works to be understood as nothing but idealistic fables with no sense of history. Even though their stories do not directly indict the social conflicts as Crabbe would have done, they supply the readers with the essence of the socio-historical background around their times: as for Goldsmoth, his reformist ideas specially in penitentiary laws, and as for Austen, the class oriented relationship between the characters, the patterns of consumptions and fashions, along with the woman as “the Angel in the Attic” question, etc. And for the tracing of these respects, Austen’s major novels, Emma, Mansfield Park, and Pride and Prejudice, and Goldsmith’s The Vicar of Wakefield are utilized. And all these findings verify Bakhtin’s idea of literary work as reflection and refraction of history.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 본론
      • Ⅲ. 결어
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 본론
      • Ⅲ. 결어
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼