This study aims to take practical and concrete ways to recognize Reevekind’s experimental work as a difficult work only or to supplement the studies he had previously viewed with an abstract and comprehensive perspective. Rather than doing limited i...
This study aims to take practical and concrete ways to recognize Reevekind’s experimental work as a difficult work only or to supplement the studies he had previously viewed with an abstract and comprehensive perspective. Rather than doing limited interpretation of drawing as an experimental work, it provides a different perspective on understanding Reevekind architecture through the process of spatializing and shaping experimental drawing. I hope this will serve as an opportunity to describe that experimental work is not just an abstract concept, but an important process in establishing an architectural view, and to reconsider the importance of experimental work