RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      동업기업에 적용되는 가산세의 과세 상 문제점

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76508391

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper evaluates and suggests ways to improve the application of penalty taxes for a partnership under the special tax treatments for partnerships and partners which has been legislated in Korean tax laws in 2007 and become effective in 2009.
      Under the current system. penalty taxes for a partnership business are computed as if the partnership were a domestic corporation according to the entity theory, whereas the taxable income is divided into those of four groups, which are residents, non-residents, domestic corporations and foreign corporations and is determined on a group basis according to the aggregate theory.
      Due to this disharmony, the recalculation of taxable income and taxes are required in determining the amount of penalty taxes for failure to maintain books and duplicate taxation of penalty taxes arises, resulting in the impairment of tax neutrality and tax equity. For a remedy, this paper suggests followings;
      First, the allocated taxable income to partners should be used and the penalty taxes should be computed by each partners, not by the partnership in determining penalty taxes for failure to maintain books.
      Second, the duplicate taxation of penalty taxes for failure to file return and for failure to maintain books should be eliminated by applying one penalty taxes, whichever is higher.
      Third, penalty taxes to each partners for failure to file return should not apply if penalty taxes for failure to file return apply to the partnership with regard to the same income. Similarly, penalty taxes to each partners for failure to maintain books should not apply if penalty taxes for failure to maintain books apply to the partnership with regard to the same income.
      번역하기

      This paper evaluates and suggests ways to improve the application of penalty taxes for a partnership under the special tax treatments for partnerships and partners which has been legislated in Korean tax laws in 2007 and become effective in 2009. U...

      This paper evaluates and suggests ways to improve the application of penalty taxes for a partnership under the special tax treatments for partnerships and partners which has been legislated in Korean tax laws in 2007 and become effective in 2009.
      Under the current system. penalty taxes for a partnership business are computed as if the partnership were a domestic corporation according to the entity theory, whereas the taxable income is divided into those of four groups, which are residents, non-residents, domestic corporations and foreign corporations and is determined on a group basis according to the aggregate theory.
      Due to this disharmony, the recalculation of taxable income and taxes are required in determining the amount of penalty taxes for failure to maintain books and duplicate taxation of penalty taxes arises, resulting in the impairment of tax neutrality and tax equity. For a remedy, this paper suggests followings;
      First, the allocated taxable income to partners should be used and the penalty taxes should be computed by each partners, not by the partnership in determining penalty taxes for failure to maintain books.
      Second, the duplicate taxation of penalty taxes for failure to file return and for failure to maintain books should be eliminated by applying one penalty taxes, whichever is higher.
      Third, penalty taxes to each partners for failure to file return should not apply if penalty taxes for failure to file return apply to the partnership with regard to the same income. Similarly, penalty taxes to each partners for failure to maintain books should not apply if penalty taxes for failure to maintain books apply to the partnership with regard to the same income.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 현행 제도의 개요
      • Ⅲ. 과세상의 문제점과 개선방안
      • Ⅳ. 결론
      • 參考文獻
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 현행 제도의 개요
      • Ⅲ. 과세상의 문제점과 개선방안
      • Ⅳ. 결론
      • 參考文獻
      • 〈Abstract〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 재정경제부 법인세제과, "파트너십 과세제도 개정요강"

      2 재정경제부 TF팀, "파트너십 과세제도 TF 논의결과"

      3 이준규, "조세특례제한법상 동업기업 과세특례제도의타당성에 관한 연구" 한국세법학회 14 (14): 51-98, 2008

      4 국회 재정경제위원회, "조세특례제한법 일부개정법률안(정부제출) 검토보고서" 국회 재정경제위원회 2007

      5 이준규, "법인에 대한 도관과세의 문제점과 개선방안" 한국세무학회 9 (9): 9-27, 2008

      6 "법인세법 시행령 41조 1항"

      7 "법인세법 116조 2항"

      8 이준규, "미국의 파트너십 과세제도" 한국조세연구원 2007

      9 이준규, "동업기업에의 출자와 관련한 과세상의 쟁점" 한국세법학회 14 (14): 128-161, 2008

      10 한국은행, "기업경영분석해설"

      1 재정경제부 법인세제과, "파트너십 과세제도 개정요강"

      2 재정경제부 TF팀, "파트너십 과세제도 TF 논의결과"

      3 이준규, "조세특례제한법상 동업기업 과세특례제도의타당성에 관한 연구" 한국세법학회 14 (14): 51-98, 2008

      4 국회 재정경제위원회, "조세특례제한법 일부개정법률안(정부제출) 검토보고서" 국회 재정경제위원회 2007

      5 이준규, "법인에 대한 도관과세의 문제점과 개선방안" 한국세무학회 9 (9): 9-27, 2008

      6 "법인세법 시행령 41조 1항"

      7 "법인세법 116조 2항"

      8 이준규, "미국의 파트너십 과세제도" 한국조세연구원 2007

      9 이준규, "동업기업에의 출자와 관련한 과세상의 쟁점" 한국세법학회 14 (14): 128-161, 2008

      10 한국은행, "기업경영분석해설"

      11 백운일, "공동사업 세무실무" (주)영화조세통람 2005

      12 Callison, J. William, "Partnership Law and Practice: General and Limited Partnerships" Thomson Reuters/West 2008

      13 Saltzman, Michael I, "IRS Practice and Procedure" RIA 2007

      14 Lind, Stephen A, "Fundamentals of Partnership Taxation" Foundation Press 2005

      15 McKee, William S, "Federal Taxation of Partnerships and Partners" RIA 2009

      16 Burke, Karen C, "Federal Income Taxation of Partners and Partnerships, 3rd ed" Thomson/West 2005

      17 재정경제부, "2008년 세법 시행령 개정안"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.87 0.87 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.92 0.89 0.843 0.5
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼