RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      일본, 프랑스, 독일의 평생교육 전문가 자격관리 방식 비교 분석 = Comparative Analysis of National Qualification Management Approaches for Lifelong Education Professionals in Japan, France, and Germany

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108740079

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study aims to identify the unique characteristics of the Korean lifelong educator system in terms of how the state manages lifelong education professional qualifications through a comparative analysis of overseas cases and suggest directions for developing the lifelong educator qualification system. To achieve this, three countries that manage the qualification of lifelong education professionals at the national level are selected.
      Specifically, Japan’s social educator (社會敎育士), France’s adult professional educator (Formateur Professionnel d’Adultes), and Germany’s social educator (Sozialpädagoge/ Sozialpädagogin) qualifications are selected as comparison targets, and up-to-date legislation, statistics, and reference materials in the original languages are collected and analyzed. The analysis reveals that Japan is characterized by universalizing the social education specialist qualification from social education officers, France focuses on a competency-based curriculum and validation of prior experiential learning (VAE), and Germany emphasizes 16 state laws and a social pedagogy degree.
      In the case of the Korean lifelong educator, the characteristics include the ease of qualification acquisition through the completion of specific subjects and “post-training” national management for mandatory placement. In conclusion, directions for improving the governance of Korean lifelong educator qualifications that reflect the results of comparative analysis are presented.
      번역하기

      This study aims to identify the unique characteristics of the Korean lifelong educator system in terms of how the state manages lifelong education professional qualifications through a comparative analysis of overseas cases and suggest directions for ...

      This study aims to identify the unique characteristics of the Korean lifelong educator system in terms of how the state manages lifelong education professional qualifications through a comparative analysis of overseas cases and suggest directions for developing the lifelong educator qualification system. To achieve this, three countries that manage the qualification of lifelong education professionals at the national level are selected.
      Specifically, Japan’s social educator (社會敎育士), France’s adult professional educator (Formateur Professionnel d’Adultes), and Germany’s social educator (Sozialpädagoge/ Sozialpädagogin) qualifications are selected as comparison targets, and up-to-date legislation, statistics, and reference materials in the original languages are collected and analyzed. The analysis reveals that Japan is characterized by universalizing the social education specialist qualification from social education officers, France focuses on a competency-based curriculum and validation of prior experiential learning (VAE), and Germany emphasizes 16 state laws and a social pedagogy degree.
      In the case of the Korean lifelong educator, the characteristics include the ease of qualification acquisition through the completion of specific subjects and “post-training” national management for mandatory placement. In conclusion, directions for improving the governance of Korean lifelong educator qualifications that reflect the results of comparative analysis are presented.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼