RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      율곡의 주재자론(主宰者論)-「별홍표숙호서(別洪表叔浩序)」를 중심으로- = Yulgok YI-I's Idea of Chief Ruler of Myriad Things

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106302806

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Few one is free from the problems of the chief ruler of myriad things and the master of the fortune-misfortune. Confucian scholars have not studied these with special concern nor excluded them. They approached those with mandate of heaven, Taiji-ultimate reality, yin-yang, and li-chi theory, not traditional concept of Shangti, Creator.
      A lot of scholars studied Yulgok YI-I's thoughts in terms of modern science, and there are more than three hundreds of articles about him in Korea, but none of them studied his idea of the chief owner and the master of fortune - misfortune. It was not his main topics. But he had some ideas about those concept characteristically of his own.
      Those are studied and uttered in the process of his li-chi, and mind-human nature-feeling theories. His view of the chief owner were founded at several articles, but most sophisticated one that we could read is the prelude for farewell of his aunt's husband.
      According to Yi-I, chief owner of myriad things is called Zhao-wha which could be translated Nature. Heaven and earth, myriad things are created from that. Therefore all things could not be free from his order. He explained the relation of between the chief owner and myriads things with the simile of the black smith. Black smith could make various tool and utensils with his own will. And he believed that those of advance-retreat, long and short life, praise -rebuke, fortune-misfortune in human life are all ever established and swayed by Chief ruler. Therefore we can not resent or blame anyone. Especially he assumed that the gossips or a false accusation over him are upon ruler's will.
      About the fortune-misfortune, he took the attitude which described in the chapter 14th of the book of Chungyung. That is a kind of attitude which one could choose the most valuable best way that he could take at that condition. He was interested in the his own mind's preside over body's organon as well as the creator of heaven and earth, and had seek the methods of strengthen the role of mind with the cultivating the kyung[敬] in order to make the mind the completely equipped and perfect stable state. He thought the impact or the function of mind with perfect entity and large function is a kind of creator's behavior. and those are the same paradigm between the action of heaven-earth and man's mind.
      There are several methods which could intervene the order of heaven-earth, so called prayer, recuperation, medicine, etc, he recognized that formal edification of moral virtue is the best one. If could be exercise, there must be the moral virtues of sage, and the position of king and teacher. The edification of the emperor Yao and Shun was the temporal, but Confucius's was the eternal one, over ten thousands generation. To him, Confucius is the best teacher who can edify everything, and was the best model of sage whom he dreamed in his mind. In conclusion, the problems of chief owner of myriad thing and the master of fortune-misfortune could be solved with the Virtue called edification.
      번역하기

      Few one is free from the problems of the chief ruler of myriad things and the master of the fortune-misfortune. Confucian scholars have not studied these with special concern nor excluded them. They approached those with mandate of heaven, Taiji-ultim...

      Few one is free from the problems of the chief ruler of myriad things and the master of the fortune-misfortune. Confucian scholars have not studied these with special concern nor excluded them. They approached those with mandate of heaven, Taiji-ultimate reality, yin-yang, and li-chi theory, not traditional concept of Shangti, Creator.
      A lot of scholars studied Yulgok YI-I's thoughts in terms of modern science, and there are more than three hundreds of articles about him in Korea, but none of them studied his idea of the chief owner and the master of fortune - misfortune. It was not his main topics. But he had some ideas about those concept characteristically of his own.
      Those are studied and uttered in the process of his li-chi, and mind-human nature-feeling theories. His view of the chief owner were founded at several articles, but most sophisticated one that we could read is the prelude for farewell of his aunt's husband.
      According to Yi-I, chief owner of myriad things is called Zhao-wha which could be translated Nature. Heaven and earth, myriad things are created from that. Therefore all things could not be free from his order. He explained the relation of between the chief owner and myriads things with the simile of the black smith. Black smith could make various tool and utensils with his own will. And he believed that those of advance-retreat, long and short life, praise -rebuke, fortune-misfortune in human life are all ever established and swayed by Chief ruler. Therefore we can not resent or blame anyone. Especially he assumed that the gossips or a false accusation over him are upon ruler's will.
      About the fortune-misfortune, he took the attitude which described in the chapter 14th of the book of Chungyung. That is a kind of attitude which one could choose the most valuable best way that he could take at that condition. He was interested in the his own mind's preside over body's organon as well as the creator of heaven and earth, and had seek the methods of strengthen the role of mind with the cultivating the kyung[敬] in order to make the mind the completely equipped and perfect stable state. He thought the impact or the function of mind with perfect entity and large function is a kind of creator's behavior. and those are the same paradigm between the action of heaven-earth and man's mind.
      There are several methods which could intervene the order of heaven-earth, so called prayer, recuperation, medicine, etc, he recognized that formal edification of moral virtue is the best one. If could be exercise, there must be the moral virtues of sage, and the position of king and teacher. The edification of the emperor Yao and Shun was the temporal, but Confucius's was the eternal one, over ten thousands generation. To him, Confucius is the best teacher who can edify everything, and was the best model of sage whom he dreamed in his mind. In conclusion, the problems of chief owner of myriad thing and the master of fortune-misfortune could be solved with the Virtue called edification.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 곽신환, "李栗谷(1536-1584)의 自然觀" 숭실대학교 22 : 1-27, 1992

      2 주희, "태극해의" 소명출판사 2009

      3 "춘추좌전"

      4 "중용집주"

      5 "주역"

      6 "율곡전서습유"

      7 "율곡전서"

      8 금장태, "율곡의 심성론과 인간이해" 서울대학교 종교문제연구소 (5) : 1999

      9 "맹자집주"

      10 문석윤, "동양적 마음의 탄생 : 마음(心)을 둘러싼 동아시아 철학의 논쟁들" 글항아리 2013

      1 곽신환, "李栗谷(1536-1584)의 自然觀" 숭실대학교 22 : 1-27, 1992

      2 주희, "태극해의" 소명출판사 2009

      3 "춘추좌전"

      4 "중용집주"

      5 "주역"

      6 "율곡전서습유"

      7 "율곡전서"

      8 금장태, "율곡의 심성론과 인간이해" 서울대학교 종교문제연구소 (5) : 1999

      9 "맹자집주"

      10 문석윤, "동양적 마음의 탄생 : 마음(心)을 둘러싼 동아시아 철학의 논쟁들" 글항아리 2013

      11 "대학집주"

      12 "논어집주"

      13 李斗燦, "栗谷 心性論에 있어서 心의 主宰와 의의" 성균관대학교 유교문화연구소 8 : 263-293, 2006

      14 곽신환, "孟子와 荀子의 ‘天’ 觀" 사색 숭실대학교, 숭실대 철학과 (10) : 23-42, 1993

      15 이선열, "17세기 조선, 마음의 철학 : 송시열 학단의 마음에 관한 탐구" 글항아리 문학동네 2015

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2010-06-23 학술지명변경 한글명 : 율곡사상연구 -> 율곡학연구
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> JOURNAL OF YULGOK-STUDIES
      KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.57 0.57 0.55
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.49 0.47 1.667 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼