RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      화서(華西) 심설(心說)에 대한 성재(省齋)의 조보(調補)와 그 의의 = Hwaseo’s Theory of Mind and Sungjae’s Supplementary Explanation on It

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106302809

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The basic consciousness of Hwaseo's Neo-confucianism is that he can not leave this world to the presidency of Ki, and thus he is defining mind as Li (以理斷心). Sungjae (省齋) actively accepted this problem consciousness. However, he criticized Hwaseo's defining mind as Li for the reason that it is against the doctrines of the scriptures and Confucian scholars, and can cause many illnesses. In this context, Sungjae has raised the necessity of supplementary explanations on Hwaseo's theory of mind.
      In fact, Hwaseo's theory is based on the idea that Li is good and Ki is bad (理善氣惡論), and completely disregards Ki. He pursued a world made up of Li only by promoting Li from self-centeredness, into a self-existent being. This is very far from the general theory of Neo-confucianism. In traditional Confucianism, there is no way of thinking that Li is good and Ki is bad, but the general theory of neo-confucianism is that emphasizes the complementary combination of Li and Ki.
      However, as a result of the attempt to complement the problems of Hwaseo's theory, Sungjae's theory seems to have failed to secure theoretical consistency by making a compromise between the general theory of the Neo-confucianism and Hwaseo's argument.
      번역하기

      The basic consciousness of Hwaseo's Neo-confucianism is that he can not leave this world to the presidency of Ki, and thus he is defining mind as Li (以理斷心). Sungjae (省齋) actively accepted this problem consciousness. However, he criticized ...

      The basic consciousness of Hwaseo's Neo-confucianism is that he can not leave this world to the presidency of Ki, and thus he is defining mind as Li (以理斷心). Sungjae (省齋) actively accepted this problem consciousness. However, he criticized Hwaseo's defining mind as Li for the reason that it is against the doctrines of the scriptures and Confucian scholars, and can cause many illnesses. In this context, Sungjae has raised the necessity of supplementary explanations on Hwaseo's theory of mind.
      In fact, Hwaseo's theory is based on the idea that Li is good and Ki is bad (理善氣惡論), and completely disregards Ki. He pursued a world made up of Li only by promoting Li from self-centeredness, into a self-existent being. This is very far from the general theory of Neo-confucianism. In traditional Confucianism, there is no way of thinking that Li is good and Ki is bad, but the general theory of neo-confucianism is that emphasizes the complementary combination of Li and Ki.
      However, as a result of the attempt to complement the problems of Hwaseo's theory, Sungjae's theory seems to have failed to secure theoretical consistency by making a compromise between the general theory of the Neo-confucianism and Hwaseo's argument.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼