RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      원격조종항공기 드론 조종기모드 표준화 연구 : 드론 조종기모드 선호도를 중심으로 = A Study on Standardization on the Flight Controller Mode in Remotely Piloted Aircraft Drone : Focused on Drone Controller Mode Preference

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106489182

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) controls as a type of unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) is growing rapidly and its flight controller stick disposition is required standardization. We should standardize RPA drone flight control disposition because the fl...

      Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) controls as a type of unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) is growing rapidly and its flight controller stick disposition is required standardization. We should standardize RPA drone flight control disposition because the flight pilot of RPA is hard to be trained so the flight controller stick differences impairs safety and wastes time and effort of flight controller industry. So this study researches the on-going standardization of RPA drone flight control disposition in Korea and foreign countries. Also this paper analyzes and researches of expert about RPA drone flight controller function and application of flight control mode. I accomplished expert research about standardization plan of unmanned flight control mode and confirm the necessity. Nowadays mode1 and 2 are mostly used in Korea so I carried out preference investigation for two modes. There were 4 preferences choices of RPA drone control mode necessity (importance) and recommendation of standardization modes. They answered that necessity of standardization is important considering pilot training, flight safety and positive development of drone industry. The result of standardization mode preference is that they prefer mode 2 (drone maker 86%, training facilities and research facilities 58%, government bureau 60%). Overall preference result shows that mode 1 24%, mode 1&2 16%, mode 2 60%. So they preferred mode 2 by 60%. The differences between two modes are the direction of throttle and pitch. Direction of throttle and pitch operate opposite way. They prefer mode 2 because mode 2 has similarities of manned flight control mode. Significance of this study is that it showed the necessity of standardization and flight control preference in a quantitative way. It will help drone standardization in related industries and development direction near future.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박원태, "원격조종항공기조종사 적성검사에 관한 연구 (적성검사 항목선정을 중심으로)" 한국항공운항학회 23 (23): 30-40, 2015

      2 유병선, "원격 조종 항공기 시스템의 인증 표준화 전략" 한국항행학회 22 (22): 1-12, 2018

      3 Electric and telecommunication research institute, "design and demonstration of the UTM(UAS Traffic Management)for safe operation of unmanned aerial vehicles"

      4 Defence acquisition program administration, "Republic of Korea(ROK) law No14116"

      5 "Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport, regulation No. 2017-361, Criteria of the aircraft technical standard product type approval"

      6 "Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport, regulation No. 2017-360, Airplane technical criteria, part 1"

      7 "Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport, regulation No. 2017-356, Criteria of the aircraft production certificate and product type approval"

      8 "Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport, Republic of Korea(ROK) law No. 14114, Civil aeronautical safety law"

      9 Korea industrial standards commission, "KS(Korea Standard)W 9000, Unmanned aircraft system, Classification and terminology, Vol. 1"

      10 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, "Flight safety regulation development and integrated operation demonstration for civil RPAS"

      1 박원태, "원격조종항공기조종사 적성검사에 관한 연구 (적성검사 항목선정을 중심으로)" 한국항공운항학회 23 (23): 30-40, 2015

      2 유병선, "원격 조종 항공기 시스템의 인증 표준화 전략" 한국항행학회 22 (22): 1-12, 2018

      3 Electric and telecommunication research institute, "design and demonstration of the UTM(UAS Traffic Management)for safe operation of unmanned aerial vehicles"

      4 Defence acquisition program administration, "Republic of Korea(ROK) law No14116"

      5 "Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport, regulation No. 2017-361, Criteria of the aircraft technical standard product type approval"

      6 "Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport, regulation No. 2017-360, Airplane technical criteria, part 1"

      7 "Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport, regulation No. 2017-356, Criteria of the aircraft production certificate and product type approval"

      8 "Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport, Republic of Korea(ROK) law No. 14114, Civil aeronautical safety law"

      9 Korea industrial standards commission, "KS(Korea Standard)W 9000, Unmanned aircraft system, Classification and terminology, Vol. 1"

      10 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, "Flight safety regulation development and integrated operation demonstration for civil RPAS"

      11 ICAO, "Doc 10019 Manual on remotely piloted aircraft systems"

      12 "Defence acquisition program administration regulation No2017-3"

      13 Lim, "A study on the legal regulation of the drone industry : Focused on the law of the unmanned flying device" Korea Research Association for Private Investigation Drones 53-82, 2018

      14 Choi, S.H, "A study on the assessment of situation awareness of helicopter pilots" Korea Aerospace University 2011

      15 Korea drone industry promotion association, "A study on drone standardization method" 71-142, 2016

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-11-29 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> KOREAN SOCIETY OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING KCI등재
      2021-11-25 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering -> Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering KCI등재
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-12-04 학술지명변경 한글명 : 산업경영시스템학회지 -> 한국산업경영시스템학회지
      외국어명 : Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering -> Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering
      KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.34 0.34 0.3
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.28 0.28 0.37 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼