RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      초등학교 교사의 수학 교과서 사용 유형에 영향을 미치는 변인들에 대한 연구: 분수 단원에 제시된 수학 문제의 인지적인 측면을 중심으로 = Elementary School Teachers` Use of Mathematics Textbook: Cognitive Demands and Influential Factors

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75596741

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study was prompted by the current curriculum policies that use textbooks as an important strategy to regulate mathematics practice and align instruction with the reformers` ideas. The purpose of this study is to examine elementary teachers` textbook use and its influential factors from a different angle, that of the cognitive demand of mathematical problems. A survey was developed based on the previous studies. A total of 203 elementary teachers from third to six grades participated in the survey. Textbook use patterns were explored by looking at the relationship between problems in textbooks and those used by teachers in teaching. Influential factors were explored in three levels--individual (e.g., teacher knowledge), contextual (e.g., student mathematics achievement), and teachers` opportunity-to-learn (e.g., Professional development [PD] experiences). Two noticeable findings emerged. First, four transformation patterns from textbook to teaching were exhibited in terms of the cognitive demand of problems (i.e., L-L, L-H, H-L, & H-H). When teachers have textbook problems that require a lower level of student thinking, some teachers maintained its cognitive demand level (L-L pattern), whereas other teachers increased the cognitive demand of problems in teaching (L-H pattern). Similar to these trends, when teachers have textbook problems that require a higher level of student thinking, some teachers maintained the high level (H-H pattern) whereas other teachers decreased its cognitive level in teaching (H-L pattern). This finding implies that although the cognitive demand of problems in textbooks is important, teachers are influenced by various factors when using textbooks in teaching. Second, six factors were identified as influential factors on teachers` textbook use. The critical factor that influences teachers who decrease higher level text to lower level cognitive demand or those who increase a lower level text into higher level cognitive demand is teachers` curriculum knowledge. This study also found other important influential factors, such as teachers` understanding-oriented objectives in teaching, active participation in PD activities. The findings of this study provide curriculum developers, professional developers, and teacher educators with information about ways in which they can support teachers in order to help teachers make better use of their texts.
      번역하기

      This study was prompted by the current curriculum policies that use textbooks as an important strategy to regulate mathematics practice and align instruction with the reformers` ideas. The purpose of this study is to examine elementary teachers` textb...

      This study was prompted by the current curriculum policies that use textbooks as an important strategy to regulate mathematics practice and align instruction with the reformers` ideas. The purpose of this study is to examine elementary teachers` textbook use and its influential factors from a different angle, that of the cognitive demand of mathematical problems. A survey was developed based on the previous studies. A total of 203 elementary teachers from third to six grades participated in the survey. Textbook use patterns were explored by looking at the relationship between problems in textbooks and those used by teachers in teaching. Influential factors were explored in three levels--individual (e.g., teacher knowledge), contextual (e.g., student mathematics achievement), and teachers` opportunity-to-learn (e.g., Professional development [PD] experiences). Two noticeable findings emerged. First, four transformation patterns from textbook to teaching were exhibited in terms of the cognitive demand of problems (i.e., L-L, L-H, H-L, & H-H). When teachers have textbook problems that require a lower level of student thinking, some teachers maintained its cognitive demand level (L-L pattern), whereas other teachers increased the cognitive demand of problems in teaching (L-H pattern). Similar to these trends, when teachers have textbook problems that require a higher level of student thinking, some teachers maintained the high level (H-H pattern) whereas other teachers decreased its cognitive level in teaching (H-L pattern). This finding implies that although the cognitive demand of problems in textbooks is important, teachers are influenced by various factors when using textbooks in teaching. Second, six factors were identified as influential factors on teachers` textbook use. The critical factor that influences teachers who decrease higher level text to lower level cognitive demand or those who increase a lower level text into higher level cognitive demand is teachers` curriculum knowledge. This study also found other important influential factors, such as teachers` understanding-oriented objectives in teaching, active participation in PD activities. The findings of this study provide curriculum developers, professional developers, and teacher educators with information about ways in which they can support teachers in order to help teachers make better use of their texts.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Russell, S. J., "The role of the teacher in curriculum development (OR, "Won't well-prepared teachers make up their own?")(OR, "Curriculum: The right way, a necessary evil, a handy reference, or partner?"). Paper presented at the Conference on Teacher Enhancement K-6, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA"

      2 Remillard, J. T., "Teachers' orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning" 35 (35): 352-388, 2003

      3 Schwille. J., "Teachers as policy brokers in the content of elementary school?mathematics In: Handbook of Teaching and Policy" Longman 370-391, 1983

      4 Martin, M. O., "TIMSS 2003 Technical Report: Findings From IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth and Fourth Grades" Chestnut Hill 2004

      5 Leinhardt, G., "Seeing the complexity of standing to the side: Instructional dialogues" 23 (23): 87-163, 2005

      6 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Professional standards for school mathematics" NCTM 1991

      7 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Principles and standards for school mathematics" National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2000

      8 Son, J., "How Reform Curricula Teach Mathematics in the U.S. and Korea. In H. Chick and K. Stacey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, PME 29, Melbourne, Australia, Vol. 3, pp. 312-318"

      9 Klinzing, G., "Higher cognitive behaviours in classroom discourse: Congruencies between teachers' questions and pupils' responses" 29 (29): 63-75, 1985

      10 Schmdt, W. H., "Four patterns of teachers' content decision-making" 19 : 439-455, 1987

      1 Russell, S. J., "The role of the teacher in curriculum development (OR, "Won't well-prepared teachers make up their own?")(OR, "Curriculum: The right way, a necessary evil, a handy reference, or partner?"). Paper presented at the Conference on Teacher Enhancement K-6, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA"

      2 Remillard, J. T., "Teachers' orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning" 35 (35): 352-388, 2003

      3 Schwille. J., "Teachers as policy brokers in the content of elementary school?mathematics In: Handbook of Teaching and Policy" Longman 370-391, 1983

      4 Martin, M. O., "TIMSS 2003 Technical Report: Findings From IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth and Fourth Grades" Chestnut Hill 2004

      5 Leinhardt, G., "Seeing the complexity of standing to the side: Instructional dialogues" 23 (23): 87-163, 2005

      6 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Professional standards for school mathematics" NCTM 1991

      7 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Principles and standards for school mathematics" National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2000

      8 Son, J., "How Reform Curricula Teach Mathematics in the U.S. and Korea. In H. Chick and K. Stacey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, PME 29, Melbourne, Australia, Vol. 3, pp. 312-318"

      9 Klinzing, G., "Higher cognitive behaviours in classroom discourse: Congruencies between teachers' questions and pupils' responses" 29 (29): 63-75, 1985

      10 Schmdt, W. H., "Four patterns of teachers' content decision-making" 19 : 439-455, 1987

      11 Remillard, J. T., "Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula" 75 (75): 211-246, 2005

      12 Sanders, N. M., "Classroom questions: What kinds?" Harper & Row 1966

      13 Remillard, J. T., "Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth-grade teachers' use of a new mathematics text" 100 (100): 331-350, 2000

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Curriculum Studies KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.81 2.81 2.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.65 2.69 3.561 0.48
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼