RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Development of one paediatric and one neonatal formulary list in hospital settings

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=O116338514

      • 저자
      • 발행기관
      • 학술지명
      • 권호사항
      • 발행연도

        2018년

      • 작성언어

        -

      • Print ISSN

        0306-5251

      • Online ISSN

        1365-2125

      • 등재정보

        SCI;SCIE;SCOPUS

      • 자료형태

        학술저널

      • 수록면

        349-357   [※수록면이 p5 이하이면, Review, Columns, Editor's Note, Abstract 등일 경우가 있습니다.]

      • 구독기관
        • 전북대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 성균관대학교 중앙학술정보관  
        • 부산대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 전남대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 제주대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 중앙대학교 서울캠퍼스 중앙도서관  
        • 인천대학교 학산도서관  
        • 숙명여자대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 서강대학교 로욜라중앙도서관  
        • 계명대학교 동산도서관  
        • 충남대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 한양대학교 백남학술정보관  
        • 이화여자대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 고려대학교 도서관  
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The aim of this study is to describe the stepwise process towards creating two formulary lists: one for paediatric and one for neonatal patients covering common diseases in hospital settings.
      This study presents the concept for developing a formulary list, namely how to: (1) organize the editorial board, (2) procure drug consumption data and database management, including information on labelling status, dosing options, excipients and problematic adverse events, current guidelines, evidence and price, (3) develop the first edition for the formulary list and formulary manual, and (4) to establish a paediatric sub‐committee within the Regional Drug and Therapeutic Committee to maintain and continually develop the two formularies.
      The total number of drugs was 411 ATC level 5, which covers 1097 unique item numbers prior to the paediatric formulary list, of which 263 item numbers were included in the final list. In neonates, 201 drugs ATC level 5 were evaluated, covering 348 unique item numbers, of which 104 item numbers were included in the final neonatal formulary list. Eighty‐eight percent of the included drugs in the paediatric formulary were licensed to children (not specified by age group), 2% were unlicensed in Denmark, and 7% were extemporaneous preparations. For neonates, the percentage was 48%, 4% and 16%, correspondingly.
      The process is time‐consuming as studies are lacking and age‐appropriate dosage forms and concentrations differ amongst countries. Nevertheless, the process should be somewhat similar between countries, albeit different drugs may be selected for the final formulary lists.


      Few countries have a formulary to guide prescription. Those that do include the UK (BNF), the Netherlands (Kinderformularium) and Sweden.
      Standard treatment guidelines do not necessarily choose between analogue drugs.
      Unlicensed and extemporaneous drugs are necessary in formularies to meet the medicinal needs of all age groups.



      In order to ensure ownership and facilitate implementation, the formulary should be based on drug consumption data and aligned with standard treatment guidelines.
      A separate neonatal formulary is recommended.
      Evaluation of drug substances is required on a detailed ATC level, as age approval and drug availability differ amongst countries.
      번역하기

      The aim of this study is to describe the stepwise process towards creating two formulary lists: one for paediatric and one for neonatal patients covering common diseases in hospital settings. This study presents the concept for developing a formulary ...

      The aim of this study is to describe the stepwise process towards creating two formulary lists: one for paediatric and one for neonatal patients covering common diseases in hospital settings.
      This study presents the concept for developing a formulary list, namely how to: (1) organize the editorial board, (2) procure drug consumption data and database management, including information on labelling status, dosing options, excipients and problematic adverse events, current guidelines, evidence and price, (3) develop the first edition for the formulary list and formulary manual, and (4) to establish a paediatric sub‐committee within the Regional Drug and Therapeutic Committee to maintain and continually develop the two formularies.
      The total number of drugs was 411 ATC level 5, which covers 1097 unique item numbers prior to the paediatric formulary list, of which 263 item numbers were included in the final list. In neonates, 201 drugs ATC level 5 were evaluated, covering 348 unique item numbers, of which 104 item numbers were included in the final neonatal formulary list. Eighty‐eight percent of the included drugs in the paediatric formulary were licensed to children (not specified by age group), 2% were unlicensed in Denmark, and 7% were extemporaneous preparations. For neonates, the percentage was 48%, 4% and 16%, correspondingly.
      The process is time‐consuming as studies are lacking and age‐appropriate dosage forms and concentrations differ amongst countries. Nevertheless, the process should be somewhat similar between countries, albeit different drugs may be selected for the final formulary lists.


      Few countries have a formulary to guide prescription. Those that do include the UK (BNF), the Netherlands (Kinderformularium) and Sweden.
      Standard treatment guidelines do not necessarily choose between analogue drugs.
      Unlicensed and extemporaneous drugs are necessary in formularies to meet the medicinal needs of all age groups.



      In order to ensure ownership and facilitate implementation, the formulary should be based on drug consumption data and aligned with standard treatment guidelines.
      A separate neonatal formulary is recommended.
      Evaluation of drug substances is required on a detailed ATC level, as age approval and drug availability differ amongst countries.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼