RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      알렌이 포착한 기회의 나라, 대한제국 = Korean Empire, the Country of Opportunity Seized by Allen

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106477888

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Allen had worked in Korea for 21 years in a very close relationship with the royal family. He was regarded as a member of Korean royal family rather than U.S. Diplomat by surrounding people. For such a reason, his recognition and evaluation on the Korean Empire can be regarded as relatively concrete and accurate. His view on the emperor was negative. He used words as weakness, indecision, corruption, irresponsibility, and stubborn person for representing emperor’s personality and character as a man of supreme power.
      As for government officials of the Korean Empire, he commented on 97 persons including Lee Young-Ik, Seo Jae-Phil, Lee Wan-Yong, and the family of Min. He regarded Lee Yong-Ik as a figure of corruption ‘who should have never been appointed’. For Seo Jae-Phil who was an American citizen, Allen showed generous attitude to protect him praising his independence movement. For Lee Wan-Yong, on the other hand, Allen changed his attitude situatinally. Sometimes he criticized Lee and evaluated him as a figure of ‘excellent judgment and courage.’ Allen’s basic view on the officials of the Korean Empire was that they are genius of changing their image and opportunistists.
      Relatively, he evaluated the subjugated people as naïve, diligent, hard-working and patient. He also commented that their diligence led to high enthusiasm for education, and they adopted quickly to the new environment and good workers. Allen also criticized that Japan carried out oppressive and uncivilized ruling without considering Korean’s high cultural sense and intelligent superiority. Such evaluation and recognition seem to have been expressed from Allen’s negative view on Japan as well as from his pity on Korean’s heartbreaking circumstance.
      Allen recognized the Korean Empire as a country of opportunity from which infinite rights could be created. Actually, Allen was involved in various kinds of rights such as gold mine, railroad, streetcar, electricity, telephone and water supply. For becoming U.S. Minister and maintaining U.S. Ministry as a person adhering to the royal family, Allen connected and mediated Emperor Gojong and American businessmen. Allen strived for the benefits of America and Americans, and regarded the Korean Empire as a rights market of America in negotiatians of rights.
      번역하기

      Allen had worked in Korea for 21 years in a very close relationship with the royal family. He was regarded as a member of Korean royal family rather than U.S. Diplomat by surrounding people. For such a reason, his recognition and evaluation on the Kor...

      Allen had worked in Korea for 21 years in a very close relationship with the royal family. He was regarded as a member of Korean royal family rather than U.S. Diplomat by surrounding people. For such a reason, his recognition and evaluation on the Korean Empire can be regarded as relatively concrete and accurate. His view on the emperor was negative. He used words as weakness, indecision, corruption, irresponsibility, and stubborn person for representing emperor’s personality and character as a man of supreme power.
      As for government officials of the Korean Empire, he commented on 97 persons including Lee Young-Ik, Seo Jae-Phil, Lee Wan-Yong, and the family of Min. He regarded Lee Yong-Ik as a figure of corruption ‘who should have never been appointed’. For Seo Jae-Phil who was an American citizen, Allen showed generous attitude to protect him praising his independence movement. For Lee Wan-Yong, on the other hand, Allen changed his attitude situatinally. Sometimes he criticized Lee and evaluated him as a figure of ‘excellent judgment and courage.’ Allen’s basic view on the officials of the Korean Empire was that they are genius of changing their image and opportunistists.
      Relatively, he evaluated the subjugated people as naïve, diligent, hard-working and patient. He also commented that their diligence led to high enthusiasm for education, and they adopted quickly to the new environment and good workers. Allen also criticized that Japan carried out oppressive and uncivilized ruling without considering Korean’s high cultural sense and intelligent superiority. Such evaluation and recognition seem to have been expressed from Allen’s negative view on Japan as well as from his pity on Korean’s heartbreaking circumstance.
      Allen recognized the Korean Empire as a country of opportunity from which infinite rights could be created. Actually, Allen was involved in various kinds of rights such as gold mine, railroad, streetcar, electricity, telephone and water supply. For becoming U.S. Minister and maintaining U.S. Ministry as a person adhering to the royal family, Allen connected and mediated Emperor Gojong and American businessmen. Allen strived for the benefits of America and Americans, and regarded the Korean Empire as a rights market of America in negotiatians of rights.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "한성신보"

      2 이윤상, "한국사 42 대한제국" 국사편찬위원회 1999

      3 "주한일본공사관기록"

      4 손정숙, "주한 미국공사 알렌(H. N. Allen)의 외교활동(1897-1905)" 이화사학연구소 (31) : 123-147, 2004

      5 최덕수, "조약으로 본 한국근대사" 열린 책들 2010

      6 "제국신문"

      7 정재정, "일제침략과 한국철도 1892-1945" 서울대 출판부 1999

      8 이영미, "을사조약 후 고종의 대미교섭 시도에 대한 알렌의 인식과 대응― 『알렌문서』 발굴 자료를 중심으로 ―" 한국근현대사학회 (82) : 93-123, 2017

      9 윤치호, "윤치호일기" 연세대학교 출판부 2001

      10 H. N. Allen, "알렌의 日記: 舊韓末 激動期 秘史" 단국대 출판부 1991

      1 "한성신보"

      2 이윤상, "한국사 42 대한제국" 국사편찬위원회 1999

      3 "주한일본공사관기록"

      4 손정숙, "주한 미국공사 알렌(H. N. Allen)의 외교활동(1897-1905)" 이화사학연구소 (31) : 123-147, 2004

      5 최덕수, "조약으로 본 한국근대사" 열린 책들 2010

      6 "제국신문"

      7 정재정, "일제침략과 한국철도 1892-1945" 서울대 출판부 1999

      8 이영미, "을사조약 후 고종의 대미교섭 시도에 대한 알렌의 인식과 대응― 『알렌문서』 발굴 자료를 중심으로 ―" 한국근현대사학회 (82) : 93-123, 2017

      9 윤치호, "윤치호일기" 연세대학교 출판부 2001

      10 H. N. Allen, "알렌의 日記: 舊韓末 激動期 秘史" 단국대 출판부 1991

      11 "알렌문서"

      12 "승정원일기"

      13 황현, "매천야록" 교문사 1994

      14 신용하, "독립협회연구" 일조각 1976

      15 "독립신문"

      16 "대한매일신보"

      17 정교, "대한계년사" 국사편찬위원회 1971

      18 이배용, "구한말 미국의 운산금광 채굴권 획득에 대하여" 50·51 : 1971

      19 "구한국외교문서"

      20 장경호, "고종의 미관파천 시도와 한미관계(1894-1905)" 한국학중앙연구원 2018

      21 "고종실록"

      22 민영환, "海天秋帆" 을유문화사 1959

      23 "朝美修好通商條約"

      24 조재곤, "擇窩 허선도선생 정년기념 한국사학논총" 일조각 1992

      25 杉村濬, "在韓苦心錄" 건국대학교 출판부 1993

      26 崔璇, "國譯 韓國誌" 한국정신문화연구원 1984

      27 장영숙, "『한성신보』의 고종과 명성황후에 대한 인식과 평가" 한국민족운동사학회 (93) : 5-38, 2017

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> EWHA SAHAK YEONGU KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보1차)
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.6 0.6 0.52
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.57 0.56 0.969 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼