RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      ‘가족계획’ 담론과 여성 ‘몸’에 대한 인식 변화 ― 1950~60년대 '여원'을 중심으로 ― = Changes in Perceptions of ‘Family Planning’ and Women's ‘Bodies’ — Focusing on Yeowon in the 1950s and 1960s —

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106477886

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      One of the “national projects” that have greatly influenced the lives and perceptions of Korean women since the 945 Liberation is the family planning project led by the May 16 military government in 1961. However, it was only in the mid-1950s that family planning discourse was discussed in relation to women's “bodies.” One of the key elements of family planning discourse in the mid-1950s was that womens’ bodies should be protected from reckless abortion by “Mom’s Health” and “Maternal and Child health.” It was raised in connection with the basic elements of ‘female right advocacy’. Family planning discourse has begun to form “new” perceptions not only of women's “bodies,” but also of the number of existing children, the family economy, views om children, childbirth and child rearing. As women's articles on women's bodies appeared, there was a movement to demand the realization of women's legal status by discussing the patriarchal family structure and consciousness and the revision of family law.
      However, in 1961, when the Park Chung-Hee administration adopted the family planning project as a national policy, the core content of the family planning project was the birth control and the control through birth control. The state actively intervened and controlled women’s bodies responsible for childbirth. The Park Chung Hee government looked at the increasing “population” as a barrier to economic development and carried out the family planning project. The population was identified as a deterrent to the “national modernization” through economic development. Therefore, women's bodies at this time were controlled by birth control and contraception rather than childbirth and rearing.
      During this period, the family planning project was carried out as a pan-national movement to control conception and birth. The most widely adopted methods of birth control were artificial abortion and abortion.
      As women's articles about women's bodies appeared, the patriarchal family structure and consciousness and the revision of family law were discussed and the actualization of women’s legal status was insisted and disclaimed. However, as the family-planning project proceeds in a state-led manner, it is linked to the improvement of the status of women in the family. It is attempted to overcome the ideology of preffering a son, which is judged to be an obstacle to population decline, even if it is not based on feminist perspective for the success of the project. It was to include women in the policy to achieve the goals of the policy, and to consider to change the structure of the large family system so that the family planning project could be “conveniently carried out.” However, this policy has obvious limitations. Family planning did not take place from the feminist point of view, and women’s status improvement and family structure were not discussed from that view, too.
      번역하기

      One of the “national projects” that have greatly influenced the lives and perceptions of Korean women since the 945 Liberation is the family planning project led by the May 16 military government in 1961. However, it was only in the mid-1950s that...

      One of the “national projects” that have greatly influenced the lives and perceptions of Korean women since the 945 Liberation is the family planning project led by the May 16 military government in 1961. However, it was only in the mid-1950s that family planning discourse was discussed in relation to women's “bodies.” One of the key elements of family planning discourse in the mid-1950s was that womens’ bodies should be protected from reckless abortion by “Mom’s Health” and “Maternal and Child health.” It was raised in connection with the basic elements of ‘female right advocacy’. Family planning discourse has begun to form “new” perceptions not only of women's “bodies,” but also of the number of existing children, the family economy, views om children, childbirth and child rearing. As women's articles on women's bodies appeared, there was a movement to demand the realization of women's legal status by discussing the patriarchal family structure and consciousness and the revision of family law.
      However, in 1961, when the Park Chung-Hee administration adopted the family planning project as a national policy, the core content of the family planning project was the birth control and the control through birth control. The state actively intervened and controlled women’s bodies responsible for childbirth. The Park Chung Hee government looked at the increasing “population” as a barrier to economic development and carried out the family planning project. The population was identified as a deterrent to the “national modernization” through economic development. Therefore, women's bodies at this time were controlled by birth control and contraception rather than childbirth and rearing.
      During this period, the family planning project was carried out as a pan-national movement to control conception and birth. The most widely adopted methods of birth control were artificial abortion and abortion.
      As women's articles about women's bodies appeared, the patriarchal family structure and consciousness and the revision of family law were discussed and the actualization of women’s legal status was insisted and disclaimed. However, as the family-planning project proceeds in a state-led manner, it is linked to the improvement of the status of women in the family. It is attempted to overcome the ideology of preffering a son, which is judged to be an obstacle to population decline, even if it is not based on feminist perspective for the success of the project. It was to include women in the policy to achieve the goals of the policy, and to consider to change the structure of the large family system so that the family planning project could be “conveniently carried out.” However, this policy has obvious limitations. Family planning did not take place from the feminist point of view, and women’s status improvement and family structure were not discussed from that view, too.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 배은경, "현대 한국의 인간 재생산" 시간여행 2012

      2 배은경, "한국사회 출산조절의 역사적 과정과 젠더 : 1970년대까지의 경험을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2004

      3 대한가족계획협회, "한국가족계획십년사"

      4 김흥주, "한국 사회의 근대화 기획과 가족정치: 가족계획사업을 중심으로" 한국인구학회 25 (25): 51-82, 2002

      5 양재모, "인구와 가족계획" 1976

      6 가족계획협회, "인구 및 가족계획" 가족계획협회 1977

      7 이진경, "역사의 공간 : 소수성, 타자성, 외부성의 사건적 사유" 휴머니스트 2010

      8 김은실, "여성의 몸, 몸의 문화정치학" 또 하나의 문화 2001

      9 조은주, "비서구의 자기인식과 역사주의: 한국의 가족계획 사업을 중심으로" 한국사회사학회 (98) : 121-153, 2013

      10 대한어머니회, "대한어머니회 40년사"

      1 배은경, "현대 한국의 인간 재생산" 시간여행 2012

      2 배은경, "한국사회 출산조절의 역사적 과정과 젠더 : 1970년대까지의 경험을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2004

      3 대한가족계획협회, "한국가족계획십년사"

      4 김흥주, "한국 사회의 근대화 기획과 가족정치: 가족계획사업을 중심으로" 한국인구학회 25 (25): 51-82, 2002

      5 양재모, "인구와 가족계획" 1976

      6 가족계획협회, "인구 및 가족계획" 가족계획협회 1977

      7 이진경, "역사의 공간 : 소수성, 타자성, 외부성의 사건적 사유" 휴머니스트 2010

      8 김은실, "여성의 몸, 몸의 문화정치학" 또 하나의 문화 2001

      9 조은주, "비서구의 자기인식과 역사주의: 한국의 가족계획 사업을 중심으로" 한국사회사학회 (98) : 121-153, 2013

      10 대한어머니회, "대한어머니회 40년사"

      11 정현주, "대한민국 제1공화국의 여성정책 연구" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2004

      12 이명선, "국회속기록에 나타난 여성정책 시각" 7 : 1990

      13 윤정란, "국가·여성·종교: 1960-1970년대 가족계획사업과 기독교 여성" 한국여성사학회 (8) : 59-91, 2008

      14 황정미, "개발국가의 여성정책에 관한 연구 : 1960~70년대의 한국 부녀행정을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2001

      15 조은주, "가족과 통치-인구는 어떻게 정치의 문제가 되었나" 창비 2018

      16 양재모, "가족계획사업 30년 회고"

      17 양재모, "가족계획교본" 대한가족설계협회 1966

      18 홍승직, "가족계획과 사회개발" (3) : 1980

      19 배은경, "가족계획 사업과 여성의 몸: 1960-70년대 출산조절 보급 과정을 통해 본 여성과 ‘근대’" 한국사회사학회 (67) : 260-299, 2005

      20 한국여성문학학회 『여원』연구모임, "『여원연구』 여성, 교양, 매체" 국학자료원 2008

      21 손애리, "Socializing Childbirth: Korea's Family Planning Program in the 1960s and 1970s" 한국사회연구소 14 (14): 101-131, 2013

      22 박광명, "5·16 군사정부의 가족계획정책 입안 배경과 논리" 동국역사문화연구소 (62) : 411-448, 2017

      23 미국인구협회 한국사무소, "1971년 아시아 가족계획" 1973

      24 보건사회부, "1970년도 가족계획사업지침"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> EWHA SAHAK YEONGU KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보1차)
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.6 0.6 0.52
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.57 0.56 0.969 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼