한국어 교사의 쓰기 평가 문식성 연구 = A Study on Writing Assessment Literacy of Korean Teachers.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this paper, we inspect the effects and aspects of writing assessment literacy on writingassessment through a think-out-loud protocol and interviews, focusing on the knowledge and beliefs of evaluators. First, in terms of ‘knowledge’, evaluators show the mental representation of the evaluation criteria by using knowledge as an evaluator. In addition, they are aware of their assessment characteristics and try to control their strictness based on the knowledge through evaluator training experience and research. The evaluators show that they try to establishthe internal criterion by themselves in the assessment situation where no evaluator training and discussion exists. Even though the analytical scoring method was given, the raters also used the holistic scoring method as a supplement. In addition, the evaluators show the social interaction that understand the context that the author intends based on writing without meetingstudent authors by exploiting the knowledge as a teacher who teaches Korean. Evaluators differed in proficiency in score representation because of their teaching experience and grader training. In terms of language use, experienced evaluators do more automated score representation than inexperienced evaluators. Next, from the perspective of ‘beliefs’, the difference between the evaluators was more prominent than the knowledge aspects. Especially, it is confirmed that the difference of beliefs of Korean writing for academic purposes evaluation constructs and L2 writing evaluation is represented as different text images and score representations. In addition, the evaluators generally agree that L1 literacy and L2 literacy is not fixed and influences each other. However, the difference in beliefs about the construct of writing for academic purposes results in differences in task performance and content criteria.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박영민, "현직 국어교사와 예비 국어교사의 쓰기평가 지식의 차이 분석" 한국작문학회 (19) : 331-352, 2013

2 안수현, "한국어능력시험(TOPIK) 쓰기 평가의 채점 특성 연구" 국제한국어교육학회 28 (28): 173-196, 2017

3 전형길, "한국어 학습자 쓰기 과정에서의 수정 양상 연구" 고려대학교 2016

4 이인혜, "한국어 쓰기 평가의 채점 방식에 따른 채점자 신뢰도 연구 : 종합적 채점 및 분석적 채점을 중심으로" 고려대학교 대학원 2012

5 김정숙, "한국어 쓰기 능력 평가 방안- 종합적 채점과 분석적 채점 결과를 중심으로" 이중언어학회 (43) : 81-99, 2010

6 최은지, "한국어 교사의 작문 평가 과정에 대한 사고 구술 연구" 우리어문학회 (47) : 273-300, 2013

7 이인혜, "한국어 교사의 쓰기 평가 효능감과 평가 특성 연구" 이중언어학회 (56) : 231-266, 2014

8 전형길, "학문 목적 한국어 쓰기 수정에서 상위인지 작용 연구" 이중언어학회 (56) : 342-373, 2014

9 이승재, "평가자 협의가 작문평가의 신뢰도에 미치는 영향" 한국교원대학교 대학원 2011

10 서수현, "쓰기 평가 협의 과정에 나타난 쓰기 평가자의 인식 연구" 국어교육학회 (44) : 335-367, 2012

11 이인혜, "사회인지적 과정을 고려한 학문 목적 한국어 쓰기 평가 과제 연구" 고려대학교 2016

12 김동수, "사고 구술법을 통한 한국어 쓰기 평가자의 숙련도별 평가 과정 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2014

13 오세영, "디지털 시대 국어교사의 인지활동과 쓰기 평가의 상관 연구" 한국국어교육학회 (92) : 255-290, 2012

14 강민석, "다국면 라쉬 모형을 통한 한국어 쓰기 평가에서의 채점 경향 연구" 고려대학교 2015

15 정희모, "글쓰기 평가에서 객관-주관주의 대립과 그 함의" 우리어문학회 (37) : 217-249, 2010

16 오세영, "국어교사의 총체적 · 분석적 쓰기 채점과 평가자 협의 과정 연구" 한국어교육학회 (141) : 183-230, 2013

17 가은아, "국어교사의 쓰기 효능감 및 쓰기 신념이 학생 쓰기 평가에 미치는 영향" 한국교원대학교 대학원 2008

18 Lee, I., "Writing teacher education and teacher learning : testimonies of four EFL teachers" 19 (19): 143-157, 2010

19 Crusan, D., "Writing assessment literacy : Surveying second language teachers knowledge, beliefs, and practices" 28 : 43-56, 2016

20 Huot, B. A., "Validating holistic scoring for writing assessment" Hampton Press 206-236, 1993

21 Huot, B. A., "Toward a new theory of writing assessment" 47 (47): 549-566, 1996

22 Wolfe, E. W., "The relationship between essay reading style and scoring proficiency in a psychometric scoring system" 4 (4): 83-106, 1997

23 Malone, M. E., "The essentials of assessment literacy : Contrasts between testers and users" 30 (30): 329-344, 2013

24 Hayes, J. R., "The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications" Erlbaum 1-27, 1996

25 Weigle, S. C., "Teaching writing teachers about assessment" 16 (16): 194-209, 2007

26 Freeman, D., "Teacher learning in language teaching" Cambridge University Press 1996

27 Borg, S., "Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do" 36 (36): 81-109, 2003

28 Freedman, S. W., "Research on writing: Principles and methods" Longman 75-98, 1983

29 Salmon, P., "Psychology for teachers: an alternative approach" Hutchinson 1988

30 Williams, M., "Psychology for language teachers : A social constructivist approach" Cambridge 1997

31 White, M. J, "Implicit Writing Beliefs and Their Relation to Writing Quality" 30 : 169-189, 2005

32 Hayes, J. R., "Cognitive processes in revision" 2 : 176-240, 1987

33 Stiggins, R. J., "Assessment crisis : the absence of assessment for learning" 83 (83): 758-765, 2002

34 Wolfe, E. W., "A study of expertise in essay scoring. Unpublished doctoral dissertation" University of California 1995