RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      종합부동산세의 신설에 관한 고찰 = A Study on the newly acted Aggregate Real Estate Tax

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A347694

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Nowadays, it is one of core issues for Korean government to stabilize the price of dwelling houses and their sites. For this purpose, the government must properly regulate the speculation on lands and dwelling houses.
      This is the background of legislation of the Aggregate Real Estate Tax Law. The purpose of this law is to promote equality of tax burden among real estate owners and stability of price of real estates such as dwelling houses and lands, to thereby encourage well-balanced development of local finance, and to strive sound development of national economy by imposing the Aggregate Real Estate Tax on owners of highly priced real estates such as lands and dwelling houses.
      Therefore, this research is to examine to what extent the consents of this law is suitable for its purposes.
      As for the stability of prices of real estates, it is doubtful that Aggregate Real Estate Tax alone can not stabilize real estate market because land is not productive goods. It is also negative that this tax can promote equality of tax burden among real estate owners because steps of tax base is simple and the tax rate is simple progressive enough to be regressive. Also it can not be expected that this tax will contribute to the well-balanced development of local finances since highly priced real estates are usually situated in cities, especially big cities such as Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Daejon, Inchon, Kwangju, and so forth.
      Thus, it is advisable to readjust the contents of this tax law to be effective in stability of real estate market, to put fair tax burden among real estate owners, and to promote balance of local finance.
      번역하기

      Nowadays, it is one of core issues for Korean government to stabilize the price of dwelling houses and their sites. For this purpose, the government must properly regulate the speculation on lands and dwelling houses. This is the background of legisl...

      Nowadays, it is one of core issues for Korean government to stabilize the price of dwelling houses and their sites. For this purpose, the government must properly regulate the speculation on lands and dwelling houses.
      This is the background of legislation of the Aggregate Real Estate Tax Law. The purpose of this law is to promote equality of tax burden among real estate owners and stability of price of real estates such as dwelling houses and lands, to thereby encourage well-balanced development of local finance, and to strive sound development of national economy by imposing the Aggregate Real Estate Tax on owners of highly priced real estates such as lands and dwelling houses.
      Therefore, this research is to examine to what extent the consents of this law is suitable for its purposes.
      As for the stability of prices of real estates, it is doubtful that Aggregate Real Estate Tax alone can not stabilize real estate market because land is not productive goods. It is also negative that this tax can promote equality of tax burden among real estate owners because steps of tax base is simple and the tax rate is simple progressive enough to be regressive. Also it can not be expected that this tax will contribute to the well-balanced development of local finances since highly priced real estates are usually situated in cities, especially big cities such as Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Daejon, Inchon, Kwangju, and so forth.
      Thus, it is advisable to readjust the contents of this tax law to be effective in stability of real estate market, to put fair tax burden among real estate owners, and to promote balance of local finance.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서언
      • Ⅱ. 부동산보유세의 개관
      • 1. 부동산보유세의 의의
      • 2. 부동산보유세의 성격
      • 3. 부동산보유세와 응익원칙
      • Ⅰ. 서언
      • Ⅱ. 부동산보유세의 개관
      • 1. 부동산보유세의 의의
      • 2. 부동산보유세의 성격
      • 3. 부동산보유세와 응익원칙
      • Ⅲ. 종합부동산세의 신설의의와 내용
      • 1. 종합부동산세 신설의 의의
      • 가. 종합부동산세의 신설배경
      • 나. 부동산가격 급등의 원인
      • 다. 부동산관련 세제의 개선
      • 2. 종합부동산세의 내용
      • 가. 총칙
      • 나. 주택에 대한 과세
      • 다. 토지에 대한 과세
      • 3. 종합부동산세의 신고·납부 및 보칙
      • 가. 신고·납부 등
      • 나. 보칙
      • Ⅳ. 종합부동산세에 대한 전망
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-08-23 학회명변경 영문명 : Chungnam National University Law Resarch Institute -> Chungnam National University Law Research Institute KCI등재
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2013-12-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Law KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.65 0.65 0.73
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.74 0.79 0.817 0.22
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼