RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      미국 델라웨어주 회사법이 우리 회사법에 미친 영향 = The Influence of Delaware Corporate Law on the Korean Company Law

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Nobody denies nowadays in Korea, that the Delaware Corporate Law has been firmly rooted in this region. Due to the long-lasting political and economic ties between the two nations, the convergence in corporate governance is to be easily ongoing. Especially in the field of fiduciary duty of directors and officers, normally at the publicly held corporations in Korea, this trend seems to be at the highest level. The business judgement standard, Caremark standard and the so called 'Red-flag'-test have been firmly introduced in various judicial reviews in Korea. Furthermore in takeover-law for example, we can see the same trend in the famous court case of "Hyundai Elevator" from the Korean District Court of Suwon (Yeo-ju Sub-District), where the judge used the 'Unocal'-standard for his reasoning. The "valid business purpose"-test in the sqeeze-out cases was also implemented in the revised ( in the year of 2011) Korean Commercial Code Book.
      As a limitating factor to the phenomenon "convergence in corporate governance" in the region, we can, first of all, point out the geological difference, which is released from the two nations. In U.S., the reasonable-thinking shareholders of publicly held corporations never attend to the shareholders' meeting due to the 'cost and time'-problem. But in Korea, a shareholder can visit his or her shareholders' meeting with ease. So the litigation over the procedural defectness from the resolutions of shareholder meeting is so popular in the region as the derivative suit in U. S. Until now the convergence has been always on the one-way path ; namely from U. S. to Korea. But in future the author hopes a convergence in corporate governance between the nations through a interacting way.
      번역하기

      Nobody denies nowadays in Korea, that the Delaware Corporate Law has been firmly rooted in this region. Due to the long-lasting political and economic ties between the two nations, the convergence in corporate governance is to be easily ongoing. Espec...

      Nobody denies nowadays in Korea, that the Delaware Corporate Law has been firmly rooted in this region. Due to the long-lasting political and economic ties between the two nations, the convergence in corporate governance is to be easily ongoing. Especially in the field of fiduciary duty of directors and officers, normally at the publicly held corporations in Korea, this trend seems to be at the highest level. The business judgement standard, Caremark standard and the so called 'Red-flag'-test have been firmly introduced in various judicial reviews in Korea. Furthermore in takeover-law for example, we can see the same trend in the famous court case of "Hyundai Elevator" from the Korean District Court of Suwon (Yeo-ju Sub-District), where the judge used the 'Unocal'-standard for his reasoning. The "valid business purpose"-test in the sqeeze-out cases was also implemented in the revised ( in the year of 2011) Korean Commercial Code Book.
      As a limitating factor to the phenomenon "convergence in corporate governance" in the region, we can, first of all, point out the geological difference, which is released from the two nations. In U.S., the reasonable-thinking shareholders of publicly held corporations never attend to the shareholders' meeting due to the 'cost and time'-problem. But in Korea, a shareholder can visit his or her shareholders' meeting with ease. So the litigation over the procedural defectness from the resolutions of shareholder meeting is so popular in the region as the derivative suit in U. S. Until now the convergence has been always on the one-way path ; namely from U. S. to Korea. But in future the author hopes a convergence in corporate governance between the nations through a interacting way.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Eisenberg, "The Structure of the Corporation, - A Legal Analysis" Beard Books 2006

      2 Coffee, Jr, "The Future as History: The Prospects for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance and its Implications" 93 : 641-, 1999

      3 Herzel, "The Delaware Law of Corporation and Bisiness Organizations, 2nd ed" 1994

      4 Kaouris, "Is Delaware still a haven for incorporation?" 20 : 965-,

      5 Funk, "In re Caremark International Inc. Derivative Litigation; director Behavior, Shareholder Protection and Corporate Legal Compliance" 31 : 311-,

      6 Gilson, "Globalizing Corporate Governance ; Convergence of Form or Function" 49 : 329-, 2001

      7 Alva, "Delaware and the Market for Corporate Charters ; History and Agency" 15 : 901-902, 1990

      8 Procter, "Corporate Governance" Cavendish Publishing 2002

      9 Allen-Kraakman-Subramanian, "Commentaries and Cases on the Law of Business Organization, 2nd ed" Kluwer

      1 Eisenberg, "The Structure of the Corporation, - A Legal Analysis" Beard Books 2006

      2 Coffee, Jr, "The Future as History: The Prospects for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance and its Implications" 93 : 641-, 1999

      3 Herzel, "The Delaware Law of Corporation and Bisiness Organizations, 2nd ed" 1994

      4 Kaouris, "Is Delaware still a haven for incorporation?" 20 : 965-,

      5 Funk, "In re Caremark International Inc. Derivative Litigation; director Behavior, Shareholder Protection and Corporate Legal Compliance" 31 : 311-,

      6 Gilson, "Globalizing Corporate Governance ; Convergence of Form or Function" 49 : 329-, 2001

      7 Alva, "Delaware and the Market for Corporate Charters ; History and Agency" 15 : 901-902, 1990

      8 Procter, "Corporate Governance" Cavendish Publishing 2002

      9 Allen-Kraakman-Subramanian, "Commentaries and Cases on the Law of Business Organization, 2nd ed" Kluwer

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.74 0.74 0.67
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.59 0.53 0.667 0.39
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼