RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재 SCOPUS

      경영자의 과잉투자성향과 이익조정의 관련성

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82474148

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      It has long been recognized by many researchers that managers’ decisions for resource allocation may be inefficient and can destroy investor value. Managers are inclined to make empire building decisions if not checked by some tight form of governance. Empire building decisions typically manifest themselves in the forms of excessive growth and excessive investment. It has been known that by increasing firm size, managers can pursue status, power, compensation, and prestige. This problem may exacerbate with the lack of information transparency. Previous research suggests that when managers are less accountable to the firm’s investors, they are more likely to make decisions for private gain, leading to poorer firm performance and ultimately loss of shareholder value. Financial disclosures are one important means of monitoring managers to make them more accountable. Investors seek high-quality disclosures that reduce information asymmetries between investors and managers. Financial accounting information is an important source of information used by shareholders and others to monitor managers. Increased transparency of accounting information causes managers to act more in the interests of shareholders, mitigating the problem of managerial overinvestment. This study was mainly motivated by the lack of empirical evidence on the relations between the accounting information quality and the degree of overinvestment propensity in the Korean context, and inconsistent explanations on such relations suggested by several previous researches. We examine the association between the accounting information opacity as proxied by earnings management and the managerial propensity for overinvestment. It is hypothesized that earnings management magnifies the information asymmetry between the firm and outside investors and between the management and stockholders, thereby hindering monitoring and checking on inefficient managerial decisions, which will lead to increased propensity to overinvest. This study also intends to show that the earnings management motivates the overinvestment and not vice versa. A related research objective is to examine whether the overinvestment propensity is exacerbated by external financing. These research objectives aim at shedding light on one negative side-effect of earnings management by demonstrating the associations between earnings management and inefficient investment decisions, in contrast to many previous researches, which mainly focused on associations between specific motives and the evidence of earnings management under various contexts. We analyze the relation between the earnings management and overinvestment on a sample of 49 firms targeted by the Financial Supervisory Service for allegedly overstating annual earnings, and on a separate sample of 6,328 firm-years consisting of firms listed in KRX over the period of 1995 to 2008. The proxies for earnings management of normal firms are measured by the discretionary current accruals and abnormal inventory changes using the forecasting models proposed by Kothari et al. (2005) and Roychowdhury (2006) respectively. The propensity to overinvest is measured by estimating the traditional Tobin's Q model and its modified version proposed by McNichols and Stubben (2008). The analysis yields following key findings. First, the window dressing settlement firms targeted by FSS undertake overinvestment in the same period as they are subject to the FSS enforcement action. The proxies of earnings management of separate sample consisting of normal firms, measured by both discretionary current accruals and abnormal inventory adjustments, are positively associated with the measure of overinvestment on a contemporaneous basis.
      번역하기

      It has long been recognized by many researchers that managers’ decisions for resource allocation may be inefficient and can destroy investor value. Managers are inclined to make empire building decisions if not checked by some tight form of governan...

      It has long been recognized by many researchers that managers’ decisions for resource allocation may be inefficient and can destroy investor value. Managers are inclined to make empire building decisions if not checked by some tight form of governance. Empire building decisions typically manifest themselves in the forms of excessive growth and excessive investment. It has been known that by increasing firm size, managers can pursue status, power, compensation, and prestige. This problem may exacerbate with the lack of information transparency. Previous research suggests that when managers are less accountable to the firm’s investors, they are more likely to make decisions for private gain, leading to poorer firm performance and ultimately loss of shareholder value. Financial disclosures are one important means of monitoring managers to make them more accountable. Investors seek high-quality disclosures that reduce information asymmetries between investors and managers. Financial accounting information is an important source of information used by shareholders and others to monitor managers. Increased transparency of accounting information causes managers to act more in the interests of shareholders, mitigating the problem of managerial overinvestment. This study was mainly motivated by the lack of empirical evidence on the relations between the accounting information quality and the degree of overinvestment propensity in the Korean context, and inconsistent explanations on such relations suggested by several previous researches. We examine the association between the accounting information opacity as proxied by earnings management and the managerial propensity for overinvestment. It is hypothesized that earnings management magnifies the information asymmetry between the firm and outside investors and between the management and stockholders, thereby hindering monitoring and checking on inefficient managerial decisions, which will lead to increased propensity to overinvest. This study also intends to show that the earnings management motivates the overinvestment and not vice versa. A related research objective is to examine whether the overinvestment propensity is exacerbated by external financing. These research objectives aim at shedding light on one negative side-effect of earnings management by demonstrating the associations between earnings management and inefficient investment decisions, in contrast to many previous researches, which mainly focused on associations between specific motives and the evidence of earnings management under various contexts. We analyze the relation between the earnings management and overinvestment on a sample of 49 firms targeted by the Financial Supervisory Service for allegedly overstating annual earnings, and on a separate sample of 6,328 firm-years consisting of firms listed in KRX over the period of 1995 to 2008. The proxies for earnings management of normal firms are measured by the discretionary current accruals and abnormal inventory changes using the forecasting models proposed by Kothari et al. (2005) and Roychowdhury (2006) respectively. The propensity to overinvest is measured by estimating the traditional Tobin's Q model and its modified version proposed by McNichols and Stubben (2008). The analysis yields following key findings. First, the window dressing settlement firms targeted by FSS undertake overinvestment in the same period as they are subject to the FSS enforcement action. The proxies of earnings management of separate sample consisting of normal firms, measured by both discretionary current accruals and abnormal inventory adjustments, are positively associated with the measure of overinvestment on a contemporaneous basis.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 송인만, "적자보고를 회피하기 위한 이익조정" 한국회계학회 13 (13): 29-52, 2004

      2 김지홍, "적자 회피 및 이익 평준화를 위한 실제 이익조정 활동" 한국회계학회 17 (17): 31-63, 2008

      3 배길수, "스톡옵션의 도입에 대한 주가반응 및 스톡옵션을 도입한 기업의 특성: 대리인 비용을 중심으로" 한국회계학회 27 (27): 1-26, 2002

      4 박종성, "분기보고서에 대한 검토와 재무제표의 유용성" 한국세무학회 6 (6): 71-95, 2005

      5 정구열, "기업소유구조와 이익의 정보효과" 한국경영학회 31 (31): 10-1727, 2002

      6 김창범, "과잉투자가 이익조정에 미치는 영향" 한국경영학회 37 (37): 901-925, 2008

      7 Baker, M, "When Does the Market Matter? Stock Prices and the Investment of Equity-Dependent Firms" 118 : 969-1005, 2003

      8 Blanchard, O, "What do Firms do with Cash Windfalls?" 36 : 337-360, 1994

      9 Hayashi,F, "Tobin's Marginal q and Average q: A neoclassical interpretation" 50 : 213-224, 1983

      10 Jensen, M. C, "Theory of the Firms: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure" 305-360, 1976

      1 송인만, "적자보고를 회피하기 위한 이익조정" 한국회계학회 13 (13): 29-52, 2004

      2 김지홍, "적자 회피 및 이익 평준화를 위한 실제 이익조정 활동" 한국회계학회 17 (17): 31-63, 2008

      3 배길수, "스톡옵션의 도입에 대한 주가반응 및 스톡옵션을 도입한 기업의 특성: 대리인 비용을 중심으로" 한국회계학회 27 (27): 1-26, 2002

      4 박종성, "분기보고서에 대한 검토와 재무제표의 유용성" 한국세무학회 6 (6): 71-95, 2005

      5 정구열, "기업소유구조와 이익의 정보효과" 한국경영학회 31 (31): 10-1727, 2002

      6 김창범, "과잉투자가 이익조정에 미치는 영향" 한국경영학회 37 (37): 901-925, 2008

      7 Baker, M, "When Does the Market Matter? Stock Prices and the Investment of Equity-Dependent Firms" 118 : 969-1005, 2003

      8 Blanchard, O, "What do Firms do with Cash Windfalls?" 36 : 337-360, 1994

      9 Hayashi,F, "Tobin's Marginal q and Average q: A neoclassical interpretation" 50 : 213-224, 1983

      10 Jensen, M. C, "Theory of the Firms: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure" 305-360, 1976

      11 Schumpeter,J, "The Theory of Economic Development" MA: Harvard University Press 1934

      12 Berle, A, "The Model Corporation and Private Property" Macmillan 1932

      13 Marris, R, "The Economic Theory of "Managerial" Capitalism" MacMillan & Co. 1964

      14 Graham, J. R, "The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting" 40 : 3-73, 2005

      15 Leuz, C, "The Economic Consequences of Increased Disclosure" 38 : 91-123, 2000

      16 Modigliani, F, "The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment" 48 : 261-297, 1958

      17 Ferreira, M, "The Colors of Investors' Money: The Role of Institutional Investors around the World" 88 : 499-533, 2008

      18 Bushman, R, "Shareholder Demand for “Distorted” Accounting Disclosures" 68 : 765-782, 1993

      19 Fama, E, "Risk Return and Equilibrium : Empirical tests" 81 : 607-636, 1973

      20 Cohen, D, "Real and Accrual Based Earnings Management in the Pre and Post Sarbanes Oxley Periods" 83 : 757-787, 2008

      21 Wang,T, "Real Investment and Corporate Securities Fraud" University of Minnesota 2008

      22 Abel,A, "Optimal Investment Under Uncertainty" 73 : 228-233, 1983

      23 Yoshikawa, H, "On the “q” Theory of Investment" 70 : 739-743, 1980

      24 Bar-Gill, O, "Misreporting Corporate Performance" Harvard University 2003

      25 Holmstrom, B, "Market Liquidity and Performance Monitoring" 101 : 678-709, 1993

      26 Hope, O, "Managerial Empire Building and Firm Disclosure" 46 : 591-626, 2008

      27 Schleifer, A, "Large Shareholders and Corporate Control" 94 : 461-488, 1986

      28 Kanodia, C, "Investment and Disclosure: The Disciplinary Role of Periodic Performance Reports" 36 : 33-55,

      29 Granger,C, "Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Methods and Cross-spectral Methods" 37 : 424-438, 1969

      30 Healy, P, "Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure, and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure literatere" 31 : 405-440, 2001

      31 Jiambalvo, J, "Incremental Information Content of the Change in Percent of Production added to Inventory" 14 : 69-97, 1991

      32 Biddle, G, "How does Financial Reporting Quality relate to Investment Efficiency?" 48 : 112-131, 2009

      33 Alti,A, "How Sensitive is Investment to Cash Flow when Financing is Frictionless?" 58 : 707-722, 2003

      34 Beatty, A, "Financial Reporting Quality, Private Information Monitoring and the Lease-versus-Buy Decision" University of Ohio State 2008

      35 Lee, M. W, "Financial Constraints and Investment for Korean Listed Public Companies" 5 (5): 33-67, 2000

      36 Bushman, R, "Financial Accounting Information and Corporate Governance" 32 : 237-333, 2001

      37 Pae,J.H, "Expected Accrual Models: The Impact of Operating Cash Flows and Reversal of Accruals" 24 : 5-22, 2005

      38 Zang,A, "Evidence on the Tradeoff between Real Manipulation and Accrual Manipulation" University of Rochester 2006

      39 Verrecchia,R, "Essays on Disclosure" 32 : 91-180, 2001

      40 Kreutzfeldt, R. W, "Error Characteristics in Audit Populations: Their Profile and Relationship to Environmental Factors" 6 : 20-44, 1986

      41 Wei, K. C. J, "Earnings Management, Corporate Investment, and Stock Returns" KUST 2005

      42 Roychowdhury,S, "Earnings Management through Real Activities Manipulation" 42 : 335-370, 2006

      43 McNichols, M, "Does Earnings Management affect Firms' Investment Decisions?" 83 : 1571-1603, 2008

      44 Kaplan, S. N, "Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints?" 112 : 169-215, 1997

      45 Dominguez-Martinez, S, "Disciplining and Screening Top Executives" Erasmus University and Tinbergen Institute 2006

      46 Myers,S, "Determinants of Corporate Borrowing" 5 : 147-176, 1977

      47 Dechow, P, "Detecting Earnings Management" 70 : 193-225, 1995

      48 Lang, M, "Cross-sectional Determinants of Analysts' Ratings of Corporate Disclosures" 31 : 246-271, 1993

      49 Myers, S, "Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms have Information that Investors do not have" 13 : 187-221, 1984

      50 Lambert,R, "Contracting Theory and Accounting" 32 : 3-87, 2001

      51 Poterba,M, "Comment : Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment" 1 : 200-206, 1988

      52 Dechow, P, "Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC" 13 : 1-36, 1996

      53 Hovakimian, A, "Cash Flow Sensitivity of Investment" City University of New York 2005

      54 Paek, W. S, "An Empirical Research on Earnings Manipulation of Window Dressing Settlement Firms" 23 (23): 133-161, 1998

      55 Ang. J, "Agency Costs and Ownership Structure" 27 : 1-26, 2000

      56 Jensen,M.C, "Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers" 76 : 323-329, 1986

      57 Francis, R, "Acquisition Profitability and Timely Loss Recognition" University of Missouri 2009

      58 Cohen, D, "Accrual-Based and Real Earnings Management Activities around Seasoned Equity Offerings" 50 : 2-19, 2010

      59 Biddle, G, "Accounting Quality and Firm-Level Capital Investment" 81 : 963-982, 2006

      60 Lambert, R, "Accounting Information, Disclosure, and the Cost of Capital" 45 : 385-420, 2007

      61 Tobin,J, "A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory" 1 : 15-29, 1969

      62 Gompers, P, "A Corporatre Governance and Equity Prices" 118 : 107-155, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.96 1.96 2.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.65 2.74 5.829 0.22
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼