<P><B>Abstract</B></P> <P>The aerodynamic damping ratios and aeroelastic instability of a 180° helical supertall building with good aerodynamic behavior in both the along-wind and across-wind responses were investiga...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107710079
2018
-
SCOPUS,SCIE
학술저널
1-12(12쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
<P><B>Abstract</B></P> <P>The aerodynamic damping ratios and aeroelastic instability of a 180° helical supertall building with good aerodynamic behavior in both the along-wind and across-wind responses were investiga...
<P><B>Abstract</B></P> <P>The aerodynamic damping ratios and aeroelastic instability of a 180° helical supertall building with good aerodynamic behavior in both the along-wind and across-wind responses were investigated using an aeroelastic model test (rocking vibration model test). The aerodynamic damping ratios for the 180° helical and square models were evaluated using the random decrement technique. Furthermore, the effect of the triggering level and number of time segments on the evaluation of the aerodynamic damping ratio was also investigated. It was found that both the mean and fluctuating displacement responses of the 180° helical model in the along- and across-wind directions showed better aerodynamic behaviors than those of the square model. Aeroelastic instability of the 180° helical model was not observed at any of the reduced velocities considered in the study. In the along-wind direction, the aerodynamic damping ratios of the 180° helical model exhibit similar trends to those of the square model. However, in the across-wind direction, the aerodynamic damping ratios of the 180° helical model show significantly different trends than those of the square model. Furthermore, there was no effect of the variation in the wind direction on the aerodynamic damping ratio of the 180° helical model. We found that in the evaluation of the aerodynamic damping ratio, it is possible to adopt the triggering level at the value of the standard deviation or √2 times of the standard deviation of the displacement responses if the random decrement signature has a high number of triggering points.</P> <P><B>Highlights</B></P> <P>Characteristics of aerodynamic damping ratio and aeroelastic instability of a 180° helical supertall building were studied through wind tunnel experiments using the rocking vibration model test.<UL> <LI> For the 180° helical model, both the mean and fluctuating displacement responses in the along-wind and across-wind directions show better aerodynamic behavior than those of the square model. </LI> <LI> Aeroelastic instability for the 180° helical model is not observed for any of the reduced velocities. </LI> <LI> In the across-wind direction, the aerodynamic damping ratios of the 180° helical model at different wind directions show a similar distribution regardless of the change in the wind direction, i.e., the effect of the aerodynamic damping force on the 180° helical model in the across-wind direction can be neglected. </LI> <LI> It might be possible to obtain a reliable aerodynamic damping ratio if the RD signature with the number of time segments over 2000 is used in the evaluation of the aerodynamic damping ratio through the rocking vibration model test. </LI> <LI> These results may be help practical designer in preliminary design of supertall buildings. </LI> </UL> </P>