정부합동청사의 국가보안시설 지정 필요성 검토 = A Review on the Necessity of Designating National Security Facilities in Joint Government Building

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Even if it is classified as a general facility, there is a need to designate additional national security facilities and strengthen security of facilities for national facilities that can greatly affect people's lives in the event of an accident. In recent years, the perception that the government should also enhance its ability to cope with crisis situations, such as strengthening surveillance activities due to increased threats to government offices, such as illegal activities by civil petitioners and violent intrusion of protesters, is also in line with this move.
In particular, despite its importance, the joint government building has not been managed and evaluated as a key national base and executed at the level of national security management so far, making it difficult to establish a protective posture when signing a national defense agreement with military units and police stations or declaring an integrated defense situation. Furthermore, the need to operate a crisis response organization to cope with terrorism and crisis situations and immediately respond to crisis situations and reorganize it into a government office security system with the ability to cope with crises or overcome them.
When it comes to the designation of security ratings for government offices, I think the most ideal combination is to ensure that security and benefits can be caught through the separate operation of security zones and free zones, despite the designation of security ratings for government offices. In order to avoid criticism such as damaging the inherent openness of the joint government office building on the grounds of excessive security, it is necessary to analyze the purpose of the office space of the joint government office building, the purpose of users' use, and the route in the office building when using it is used. It is also considered realistic to set up and operate a separate zone that meets the need for designation as a national security facility while maintaining the purpose of the open building.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이상훈, "정부청사 방호안전체계 구축을 위한 연구용역" 행정안전부 정부청사관리본부 2017

2 정태황, "국가중요시설 안전관리 강화방안 : 공공기관을 중심으로" 한국치안행정학회 8 (8): 93-110, 2011

3 강희조, "공공안전을 위한 국가기반체계 보호제도의 핵심기능연속성에 관한 연구" 한국디지털콘텐츠학회 18 (18): 795-802, 2017

4 Department of Justice, "Vulnerability Assessment of Federal Facilities" U.S. Department of Justice 1995

5 Government of Japan, "The basic policy of critical information infrastructure protection" Government of Japan 2015

6 Born, H., "Parliamentary oversight of the security sector: Principles, mechanisms and practices" Geneva center for the democratic control of armed forces(Inter-Parliamentary Union) 2003

7 NIPP, "National Infrastructure Protection Plan: Partnering to enhance protection and resiliency" U.S. Department of Homeland Security 2016

8 FPS, "Federal Protective Service ANNUAL REPORT" U.S. Department of Homeland Security 2015

9 Department of Homeland Security, "Federal Building and Facility Security: frequently asked question" Congressional Research Service 2014