RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      기후환경권과 국가 온실가스 감축목표의 헌법 합치성 검토: 탄소예산 접근법의 적용 = The Right to a Stable Climate and the Constitutionality of Republic of Korea's NDC: the Application of Carbon Budget Approach

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      “No country alone can stop global warming.” This reveals that all mankind shares a climate system together, and that the greenhouse gases emitted by humans anywhere affect the climate system regardless of where it is.
      Therefore, in order to protect the people's rights to life and health and human life from the effects of climate system disturbances and the environmental rights, which are objective prerequisites for these rights, the nation's climate laws and policies must prioritize stabilizing the climate system.
      Constitutional conformity should be determined by whether a country's goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions contribute sufficiently to the stabilization of the climate system in climate litigation. This is because, according to the Paris Agreement, the level of aspirations contained in the NDC of each State Party is expected to meet the global temperature goals and reflect the highest and progressive ambitions possible.
      At this time, whether the level of emission reduction is sufficient can be determined by using the carbon budget as a measure. According to the carbon budget estimate and the government's reduction target scenario, Korea's carbon budget is exhausted in 2025 (1.5℃) or 2028 (1.7℃). The Republic of Korea must reduce greenhouse gas emissions (net-zero) from 2029, which is practically impossible. In the end, this indicates that the Republic of Korea's emission reduction target is not sufficient.
      The government, therefore, can be evaluated as violating the claimant's right to life, health, and human life by failing to fulfill the level of protection ordered by the Constitution by setting emission reduction targets too low, or by violating climate environmental rights by allowing greenhouse gas emissions excessively.
      번역하기

      “No country alone can stop global warming.” This reveals that all mankind shares a climate system together, and that the greenhouse gases emitted by humans anywhere affect the climate system regardless of where it is. Therefore, in order to protec...

      “No country alone can stop global warming.” This reveals that all mankind shares a climate system together, and that the greenhouse gases emitted by humans anywhere affect the climate system regardless of where it is.
      Therefore, in order to protect the people's rights to life and health and human life from the effects of climate system disturbances and the environmental rights, which are objective prerequisites for these rights, the nation's climate laws and policies must prioritize stabilizing the climate system.
      Constitutional conformity should be determined by whether a country's goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions contribute sufficiently to the stabilization of the climate system in climate litigation. This is because, according to the Paris Agreement, the level of aspirations contained in the NDC of each State Party is expected to meet the global temperature goals and reflect the highest and progressive ambitions possible.
      At this time, whether the level of emission reduction is sufficient can be determined by using the carbon budget as a measure. According to the carbon budget estimate and the government's reduction target scenario, Korea's carbon budget is exhausted in 2025 (1.5℃) or 2028 (1.7℃). The Republic of Korea must reduce greenhouse gas emissions (net-zero) from 2029, which is practically impossible. In the end, this indicates that the Republic of Korea's emission reduction target is not sufficient.
      The government, therefore, can be evaluated as violating the claimant's right to life, health, and human life by failing to fulfill the level of protection ordered by the Constitution by setting emission reduction targets too low, or by violating climate environmental rights by allowing greenhouse gas emissions excessively.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼