RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Looking for the Evidence of “Self-Evident Truth”: Creation Scientists’ Research and Identity Examined through the Methuselah Project

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      One of the major criticisms of creation science is the assertion that creation sci-ence is not a knowledge production system but rather a collection of rhetoric and discourses based on the Bible. This means that creation scientists are not produc-ing new evidence or data but are only reinterpreting the evidence and data pro-duced by other scientists to make them fit in with the Bible. However, some crea-tion scientists have received academic degrees through methodologies required by traditional science and are conducting research in secular organizations, including universities and government institutions. Creation scientists reject the common notion that personal faith and research need to be separated. How should we un-derstand these creation scientists? In this context, this study analyzes the decade-long Methuselah Project, led by Professor Lee Eun-il (Yi Ŭnil) of Korea Universi-ty in the early 2000s. Regardless of the research team‘s belief that the Bible is an uncompromisable record of scientific and historical fact, the water canopy theory, one of the theories that the Methuselah Project aimed to verify through research, was a hypothesis derived from the Bible. Therefore it was able to play a mediating role between the immutable truth of the Bible and dynamic science. By examining the research activities of creation scientists from this perspective, it is possible to explain how creation scientists can conduct research for an already fixed conclu-sion. Moreover, this study shows us how creation scientists resolve the conflict between their personal faith and their identity as scientists.
      번역하기

      One of the major criticisms of creation science is the assertion that creation sci-ence is not a knowledge production system but rather a collection of rhetoric and discourses based on the Bible. This means that creation scientists are not produc-ing ...

      One of the major criticisms of creation science is the assertion that creation sci-ence is not a knowledge production system but rather a collection of rhetoric and discourses based on the Bible. This means that creation scientists are not produc-ing new evidence or data but are only reinterpreting the evidence and data pro-duced by other scientists to make them fit in with the Bible. However, some crea-tion scientists have received academic degrees through methodologies required by traditional science and are conducting research in secular organizations, including universities and government institutions. Creation scientists reject the common notion that personal faith and research need to be separated. How should we un-derstand these creation scientists? In this context, this study analyzes the decade-long Methuselah Project, led by Professor Lee Eun-il (Yi Ŭnil) of Korea Universi-ty in the early 2000s. Regardless of the research team‘s belief that the Bible is an uncompromisable record of scientific and historical fact, the water canopy theory, one of the theories that the Methuselah Project aimed to verify through research, was a hypothesis derived from the Bible. Therefore it was able to play a mediating role between the immutable truth of the Bible and dynamic science. By examining the research activities of creation scientists from this perspective, it is possible to explain how creation scientists can conduct research for an already fixed conclu-sion. Moreover, this study shows us how creation scientists resolve the conflict between their personal faith and their identity as scientists.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Lee, Byung-soo, "Yŏssae Tongan-e: 6-il Ch’angjo-ŭi Chŭnggŏdŭl (In six days: evidences of six days of creations)" Sech‘ang midiŏ 2011

      2 Lee, Eun-il, "Yujŏnch‘e, Tanbaekjilch‘e Kisul Mit Noch‘ul P‘yŏngga, DNA Sonsang P‘yŏngga Tŭngŭl Iyonghak Toksŏng Pyŏngga Kisul Kaebal Ch‘oejongbogosŏ (Development of toxico-logical assay on genomics, proteomics, exposure assessment and DNA damage)" Korea University 2002

      3 Lee, Eun-il, "Yujŏch‘e Mit Tanbaekch‘e Hwan‘gyŏngdoksŏng Ŭig-wahaksentŏ, Koryŏ taehakkyo MRC (Environmental Toxico-Genomic and Proteomic Research Center, Korea University MRC)" 16 (16): 30-35, 2004

      4 Jo, Jeong-il, "Wuri-nŭn Wae Ch‘angjogwahak-ŭl Chijihanŭŭn‘ga? – Kwahak, Sŏnggyŏng, Kŭrigo Yulli-wa Kwallyŏnhayŏ (Why do we support creation science? On science, the Bible and morals)" 150 : 29-39, 2007

      5 Blancke, Stefaan, "Why Do Irrational Beliefs Mimic Science? The Cultural Evolution of Pseudoscience" 83 (83): 78-97, 2017

      6 Boudry, Maarten, "What Makes Weird Beliefs Thrive? The Epidemiology of Pseudoscience" 28 (28): 1177-1198, 2014

      7 Larson, Edward J., "Trial and Error: The American Controversy over Creation and Evolution" Oxford Uni-versity Press 2003

      8 Locke, Simon, "The Use of Scientific Discourse by Creation Scien-tists: Some Preliminary Findings" 3 (3): 403-424, 1994

      9 Shapin, Steven, "The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Mod-ern Vocation" University of Chicago Press 2008

      10 Gordin, Michael D., "The Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe" The University of Chicago Press 2012

      1 Lee, Byung-soo, "Yŏssae Tongan-e: 6-il Ch’angjo-ŭi Chŭnggŏdŭl (In six days: evidences of six days of creations)" Sech‘ang midiŏ 2011

      2 Lee, Eun-il, "Yujŏnch‘e, Tanbaekjilch‘e Kisul Mit Noch‘ul P‘yŏngga, DNA Sonsang P‘yŏngga Tŭngŭl Iyonghak Toksŏng Pyŏngga Kisul Kaebal Ch‘oejongbogosŏ (Development of toxico-logical assay on genomics, proteomics, exposure assessment and DNA damage)" Korea University 2002

      3 Lee, Eun-il, "Yujŏch‘e Mit Tanbaekch‘e Hwan‘gyŏngdoksŏng Ŭig-wahaksentŏ, Koryŏ taehakkyo MRC (Environmental Toxico-Genomic and Proteomic Research Center, Korea University MRC)" 16 (16): 30-35, 2004

      4 Jo, Jeong-il, "Wuri-nŭn Wae Ch‘angjogwahak-ŭl Chijihanŭŭn‘ga? – Kwahak, Sŏnggyŏng, Kŭrigo Yulli-wa Kwallyŏnhayŏ (Why do we support creation science? On science, the Bible and morals)" 150 : 29-39, 2007

      5 Blancke, Stefaan, "Why Do Irrational Beliefs Mimic Science? The Cultural Evolution of Pseudoscience" 83 (83): 78-97, 2017

      6 Boudry, Maarten, "What Makes Weird Beliefs Thrive? The Epidemiology of Pseudoscience" 28 (28): 1177-1198, 2014

      7 Larson, Edward J., "Trial and Error: The American Controversy over Creation and Evolution" Oxford Uni-versity Press 2003

      8 Locke, Simon, "The Use of Scientific Discourse by Creation Scien-tists: Some Preliminary Findings" 3 (3): 403-424, 1994

      9 Shapin, Steven, "The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Mod-ern Vocation" University of Chicago Press 2008

      10 Gordin, Michael D., "The Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe" The University of Chicago Press 2012

      11 Dawkins, Richard, "The God Delusion" Bantam Books 2006

      12 Donggeun Sul, "The Expression of DNA Polymerase-β and DNA Damage in Jurkat Cells Exposed to Hydrogen Peroxide under Hyperbaric Pressure" 대한독성 유전단백체 학회 4 (4): 66-71, 2008

      13 Numbers, Ronald L., "The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design" Harvard University Press 2006

      14 Park, Hee-Joo, "The Creation-Evolution Debate: Carving Creation-ism in the Public Mind" 10 (10): 173-186, 2001

      15 Larson, Edward J., "Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America's Continuing Debate over Science and Religion" Basic Books 2008

      16 Park, Hyung Wook, "Science, State, and Spiritu-ality: Stories of Four Creationists in South Korea" 56 (56): 35-71, 2018

      17 Oh, Sangnam, "Sansodoksŏng Mit Sep‘onohwa-rŭl Ch‘oraehanŭn Mulch‘ŭng Iron-e Ipgakhan 2-kiap Amnyŏk (The water canopy theory-based two-atmosphere pressure that causes oxidative toxicity and cell aging)" Han‘guk Ch‘angjo Kwahakhoe (Korean Association for Creation Research) 97-98, 2007

      18 Oh, Sangnam, "Role of Elevated Pressure in Trail-Induced Apoptosis in Human Lung Carcinoma Cells" 15 (15): 1517-1528, 2010

      19 Gould, Stephen Jay, "Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life" Ballantine Pub 1999

      20 Trollinger, Susan L., "Righting Ameri-ca at the Creation Museum" Johns Hopkins University Press 2016

      21 Lee, Eun-il, "P‘erŭm-sŏkt‘an‘gi 35% Sansonongdo-e Taehan Mulch‘ŭng Iron-e Ipgakhan Haesŏk (The water canopy theo-ry-based interpretation of 35 percent oxygen concentration in the Permo-carboniferous)" Han‘guk Ch‘angjo Kwahakhoe (Ko-rean Association for Creation Research) 135-141, 2011

      22 Setälä, Vienna, "Public Perception of Evolu-tion and the Rise of Evolutionary Psychology in Finland" 20 (20): 558-573, 2011

      23 Gusterson, Hugh, "Nuclear Rites: A Weapons Laboratory at the End of the Cold War" University of California Press 1996

      24 Lee, Jae-man, "Noah Hongsu Konsŏt’ŭ (Noah‘s flood concert)" Turannosŏwŏn 2009

      25 Allgaier, Joachim, "Networking Expertise: Discursive Coalitions and Collaborative Networks of Experts in a Public Creationism Contro-versy in the UK" 21 (21): 299-313, 2012

      26 Lee, Jae-man, "Mushinnon Kija, Kŭrisŭch‘ŏn Kwahakja-ege Ttajida, Woo Jong-hak, 2014 Pip‘an” (Criticism of “An atheist reporter ques-tions a Christian scientist,” Woo Jong-hak, 2014)"

      27 Lee, Eun-il, "Mulch‘ŭng Iron-e Ipgakhan 2-kiap Amnyŏk-ŭi Saengmulhakjŏk Yŏnghyang (Biological Impact of the Water Canopy Theory-based Two-atmosphere Pressure Envi-ronment)" Han‘guk Ch‘angjo Kwahakhoe (Korean Associa-tion for Creation Research) 313-316, 2013

      28 Golinski, Jan, "Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science" Cambridge University Press 1998

      29 Lim, In-bae, "Kich‘o Ŭig-wahak Yŏn‘gu Sentŏ (MRC) Chŏngch‘aek T‘oronhoe Charyojip (Collection of materials for a policy discussion on medical research centers) (November 17, 2006)"

      30 Stanley, Matthew, "Huxley's Church and Maxwell's Demon: From Theistic Science to Naturalistic Science" University of Chi-cago Press 2014

      31 Lee, Eun-il, "Han Son-e Chaphinŭn Ch’angjogwahak (Creation sci-ence at a glance)" Turanno 2008

      32 Oh, Eun-Ha, "Effects of Hyperbar-ic Pressure on Cellular Morphology, Proliferation and Protein Ex-pression of Jurkat Cell" 1 (1): 116-123, 2005

      33 Ruse, Michael, "Creation Science Is Not Science" 7 (7): 72-78, 1982

      34 Edmond, Gary, "Creating (Public) Science in the Noah's Ark Case" 8 (8): 317-343, 2016

      35 Lee, Jae-man, "Ch’angjogwahak Konsŏtŭ (Creation Science Concert)" Turanno 2006

      36 Lee, Eun-il, "Ch‘angjoron Kyoyuk Idaero Choŭn‘ga (Creation sci-ence education, is it okay to maintain a status quo?)" 185 : 2016

      37 Park, Chang-sung, "Ch‘angjogwahakjadŭrŭn Ŏtŏke Ch‘angjo-rŭl Chŭngmyŏngharyŏgo Hamnika? Ch‘angjogwahakjadŭre Taehan Shimgakhan Ohae (How are creation scientists trying to prove crea-tion?: serious misconceptions of creation scientists)" 179 : 29-31, 2014

      38 Kim, Byung Hoon, "Ch‘angjogwahak-ŭi Ŭiŭi-wa Kidae: Shinhakja-ŭi Kwanjŏm-esŏ (The significance and expectations of creation sci-ence: from the perspective of a theologian)" 10-17,

      39 Lee, Eun-il, "Ch‘angjogwahak-e Taehan Sogae 2 (An introduction on creation science 2)" 125·126 : 36-42, 2001

      40 Lee, Eun-il, "Ch‘angjogwahak, Ijŏngp‘yo-ŭi Yŏkhal-ŭl Punmyŏnghi Haja (Creation science must play a clear role of a signpost)" 150 : 19-25, 2007

      41 Hong Ki-beom, "Ch‘angjo-chinhwa Nonjaeng-ŭn Kwahak Non-jaeng-i Anin, Yŏksa Nonjaengida (The creation-evolution controver-sy is not about science but about history)" 166 : 118-122, 2011

      42 Han, Yun-bong, "Ch‘angjo Shinang-gwa Kwahak, Kŭrigo Pogŭm (Creation faith, science, and the Gospel)" 6-63, 2017

      43 Lim, Bun-sam, "Chonggyo-wa Kwahak-ŭn Ŏttŏn Kwangyin‘ga? (What is the relationship between religion and science?)" 160 : 13-22, 2010

      44 Kim, Jinsoo, "Chinhwaron-ch‘angjoron Nonjaeng-e Taehan Haengwija-yŏn‘gyŏrmang Punsŏk: Kwahakgyogwasŏ-rŭl Chung-shimŭro (An actor-network analysis of the evolution-creationism controversy: focusing on Korean science textbooks)" Kookmin University 2016

      45 Lee, Eun-il, "Amnyŏk Chojŏl Paeyang Changch‘i T‘ŭkhŏ Gonggo (Patent announcement of a pressure-controlled in-cubator)"

      46 Sul, Dong-geun, "2-kiap Amnyŏk Yŏn‘gu-rŭl Wihan Amnyŏk Sep‘o Paeyanggi Chejak Mit 2-kiap Amnyŏg-i Sep‘o Sŏngjang Mit Sep‘o Hwalsŏng-e Mich‘inŭn Yŏnghyang (Manufacturing of a pressure cell incubator for a two-atmosphere pressure study and the impact of a two-atmosphere pressure has on cell growth and vitality)" Taehan Yebang Ŭihakhoe (Korean Society for Preventive Medicine) 343-344, 2001

      47 Lee, Eun-il, "2-kiap Amnyŏgi Sep‘o Sŏngjang-gwa DNA Pokgu-e Mich‘inŭn Yŏnghyang (The effect of a two-atmosphere pressure on cell growth and DNA recovery)" 1 (1): 3-12, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.08 0.08 0.07
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.06 0.05 0.549 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼