RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Case Note: SBS v CJ E&M., Korean Supreme court Decision 2014Da9180 Decided November 9, 2017 -Analysis on Copyright Infringement Judgment of Reality TV Show in Korea- = Case Note: SBS v CJ E&M., Korean Supreme court Decision 2014Da9180 Decided November 9, 2017 -Analysis on Copyright Infringement Judgment of Reality TV Show in Korea-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105226251

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this article is to analyze copyright infringement case between SBS and CJ E&M in Korea. The plaintiff, SBS had broadcast a TV show titled "Jjack" which is a reality TV program shown ordinary men and women find their partner. Defendant, ...

      The purpose of this article is to analyze copyright infringement case between SBS and CJ E&M in Korea. The plaintiff, SBS had broadcast a TV show titled "Jjack" which is a reality TV program shown ordinary men and women find their partner. Defendant, CJ E&M broadcasted a "SNL Korea" and one segment of this program shown professional actors in charge of prisoners or patients search for a partner. Another audiovisual work of CJ E&M is video to promote their online game which concept is people who play games gather in love villages to find a pair to play with. SBS claimed that CJ E&M infringed the copyright of SBS, and engaged in unfair competition, and damaged the reputation by unauthorized use of the title "Jjack". This lawsuit had begun in 2012 in the Seoul Central District Court, going on appeal to the Seoul High Court, and ultimately to the Korea Supreme Court, which ruled in November 2017. It is noteworthy that the ruling, which was the same in the first and second instances, was finally partially reversed by the Supreme Court. A key point of the Supreme Court’s judgment was that a reality TV program which is unscripted and based only on a rough framework that show mainly how the participants react in certain situations can be protected as copyrightable work. The ruling appears to be an important milestone in the intellectual property dispute over reality TV show formats.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼