상향식-하향식 DEA 모형을 이용한 온실가스 감축량 배분

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this paper, we develop a model that adjusts the GHG (Green House Gas) reduction targets by taking account of the bottom-up allocation approach in addition to the top-down allocations. Using environmental efficiency instead of the amount of GHG emissions, we propose a DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis)-based model to allocate the reduction target. By comparing the top-down allocations with the bottom-up allocations, we identify how much each company can reduce or should require the amount of GHG emission permits. In this regard, the purpose of this research includes the development of mathematical models, collecting data sets for empirical analysis, and showing managerial implications. The top-down model allocates the GHG reductions into companies while maximizing the total efficiency so as to accomplish fair allocations. The bottom-up model determines the maximum amount of GHG reductions with aims to maximize the efficiency of individual company. We perform empirical analysis to see differences between the top-down and bottom-up allocations. We obtain data from 36 Korean domestic companies in steel industry. Our empirical analysis provides the guideline how much each company should buy or can sell GHG emissions.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 1. 서론
• 2. 문헌 연구
• 3. DEA 수리 모형
• 4. 실증 연구
• 5. 결론 및 토의
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 환경부, "온실가스 배출권거래제 제1차 계획기간(2015년～2017년) 국가 배출권 할당계획" 2015

2 홍운선, "온실가스 감축 규제가 중소기업에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 중소기업연구원 2010

3 Scheel, H., "Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations" 132 (132): 400-410, 2001

4 Fischer, C., "Output-based allocation of emissions permits : Efficiency and distributional effects in a general equilibrium setting with taxes and trade" Resources for the future 4-37, 2004

5 Hahn, T., "Opportunity cost based analysis of corporate eco-efficiency : a methodology and its application to the CO2-efficiency of German companies" 91 : 1997-2007, 2010

6 Gomes, E.G., "Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models" 59 (59): 616-623, 2008

7 Du, J., "Fixed cost and resource allocation based on DEA cross-efficiency" 235 (235): 206-214, 2014

8 Boyd, G.A., "Estimating the linkage between energy efficiency and productivity" 28 (28): 289-296, 2000

9 Mukherjee, K., "Energy use efficiency in the Indian manufacturing sector : An interstate analysis" 36 (36): 662-672, 2008

10 Miao, Z., "Efficient allocation of CO2 emissions in China : a zero sum gains data envelopment model" 112 : 4144-4150, 2016

11 Passetti, E., "Eco-efficiency measurement and the influence of organisational factors : evidence from large Italian companies" 122 : 228-239, 2016

12 조나래, "DEA를 활용한 중앙집중식 온실가스 감축 할당 모형" 대한산업공학회 43 (43): 203-212, 2017

13 문하나, "DEA를 활용한 국내 기업의 에너지효율성 분석" 한국경영과학회 32 (32): 37-54, 2015

14 Wu, J., "DEA based resource allocation considering environmental factors" 58 : 1128-1137, 2013

15 Sueyoshi, T., "DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement : Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation" 33 (33): 292-303, 2011

16 Lozano, S., "Centralized resource allocation using data envelopment analysis" 22 : 143-161, 2004

17 Asmild, M., "Centralized resource allocation BCC models" 37 : 40-49, 2009

18 Lozano, S., "Centralised reallocation of emission permits using DEA" 193 : 752-760, 2009

19 Feng, C., "Carbon Emissions Abatement(CBA) allocation and compensation schemes based on DEA" 53 : 78-89, 2015

20 Sun, J., "Allocation of emission permits using DEA : centralised and individual points of view" 52 (52): 419-435, 2014

21 Li, Y. J., "Allocating the fixed cost as a complement of other cost inputs : a DEA approach" 197 : 389-401, 2009

22 Amirteimoori, A., "Allocating fixed costs and target setting : a DEAbased approach" 171 : 136-151, 2005

23 Amin, G.R., "A polynomial-time algorithm for finding ε in DEA models" 31 : 803-805, 2004

24 Hatami-Marbini, A., "A common-weights DEA model for centralized reduction and target setting" 79 : 195-203, 2015

25 Wu, H., "A DEAbased approach for fair reduction and reallocation of emission permits" 58 (58): 1095-1101, 2013