RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      中共 100년의 마오와 마오이즘 — 기원, 해석, 전유 —

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This article explores the origins, interpretations, and appropriations of Maoism over the past 100 years of CCP history. As the concept and reality of Maoism has produced wide-ranging associations, any attempt to formulate a definition of it may unavoidably fall prey to the danger of simplification and bias.
      To gain a comprehensive understanding of Maoism, this article focuses firstly on the historical context of the Communist revolution in which Mao Zedong"s thought was formed and evolved, and on the series of appropriations of this thought. Specifically, it examines the conditions of an underdeveloped agrarian society, the overwhelming of the Guomindang"s forces, the inner-Party power struggles in Jiangxi and Yan’an, the discourse of class struggle under Mao’s rule, the phenomenon of ‘Mao Zedong-ism’ during the Cultural Revolution, and the official stance of ‘seeking truth from facts’ which was in tension with the non-official Maoist Left’s egalitarianism, which developed in the post-Mao era.
      Secondly, the paper looks at the orientation of Maoism. Mao Zedong"s thought in its formative stage displayed an inward orientation, with an emphasis on the Chinese national character and Chinese communists’ own practice of Marxism-Leninism. At the end of the 1950s this changed as Mao focused more on the reality of socialism, and a focus on China becoming a self-proclaimed ‘bastion of socialism’ in contrast to Soviet ‘revisionism’. The Cultural Revolution was a milestone for this conception of universally applicable Maoism, with both the First World and the Third World’s revolutionary movements becoming deeply inspired by this model. Post-Mao China largely reverted to its own nation-specific form of socialism through the concept of ‘Socialism with Chinese characteristics’.
      Thirdly, the status of Maoism relative to Marxism-Leninism is discussed. Fierce debates over the originality and voluntarism of Maoism illustrate the various interpretations and appropriations produced by Western academia in the era of Mao. While a minority of researchers focused on the continuity of Maoism in relation to Marxist theory, and its development of the theory, the dominant strain of scholarship emphasized the ‘break’ and ‘deviation’ of Maoism from Marxist orthodoxy, based on textual comparisons. In a different vein, some ‘radical’ or ‘critical’ leftwing scholars paid attention to Maoist revolutionary objectives with the aim of shedding light on the liberatory potential of Maoism in the midst of what they viewed as the anarchy of the capitalist world.
      In light of the diverse interpretations and appropriations of Maoism, this paper does not limit itself to Mao’s thought, theories, and orientations as evidenced in his works, but includes his revolutionary praxis and policies, the governance system of his era, and the explicit and implicit symbols embedded in all these facets of the era. Today’s continuing appropriations of Mao and Maoism implies that the thought and practice of Mao Zedong has a fertile afterlife. In that today’s Maoism is becoming both an alternative to capitalism and a competitive means of capitalist achievement, Maoism has not ceased to expand its range of associations and applications. On its centenary, though the CCP is an integral part of global capitalism and an advocate of free trade, the resilience of the unitary Party-state is likely related to the party"s flexible appropriation of Mao and Maoism.
      번역하기

      This article explores the origins, interpretations, and appropriations of Maoism over the past 100 years of CCP history. As the concept and reality of Maoism has produced wide-ranging associations, any attempt to formulate a definition of it may unavo...

      This article explores the origins, interpretations, and appropriations of Maoism over the past 100 years of CCP history. As the concept and reality of Maoism has produced wide-ranging associations, any attempt to formulate a definition of it may unavoidably fall prey to the danger of simplification and bias.
      To gain a comprehensive understanding of Maoism, this article focuses firstly on the historical context of the Communist revolution in which Mao Zedong"s thought was formed and evolved, and on the series of appropriations of this thought. Specifically, it examines the conditions of an underdeveloped agrarian society, the overwhelming of the Guomindang"s forces, the inner-Party power struggles in Jiangxi and Yan’an, the discourse of class struggle under Mao’s rule, the phenomenon of ‘Mao Zedong-ism’ during the Cultural Revolution, and the official stance of ‘seeking truth from facts’ which was in tension with the non-official Maoist Left’s egalitarianism, which developed in the post-Mao era.
      Secondly, the paper looks at the orientation of Maoism. Mao Zedong"s thought in its formative stage displayed an inward orientation, with an emphasis on the Chinese national character and Chinese communists’ own practice of Marxism-Leninism. At the end of the 1950s this changed as Mao focused more on the reality of socialism, and a focus on China becoming a self-proclaimed ‘bastion of socialism’ in contrast to Soviet ‘revisionism’. The Cultural Revolution was a milestone for this conception of universally applicable Maoism, with both the First World and the Third World’s revolutionary movements becoming deeply inspired by this model. Post-Mao China largely reverted to its own nation-specific form of socialism through the concept of ‘Socialism with Chinese characteristics’.
      Thirdly, the status of Maoism relative to Marxism-Leninism is discussed. Fierce debates over the originality and voluntarism of Maoism illustrate the various interpretations and appropriations produced by Western academia in the era of Mao. While a minority of researchers focused on the continuity of Maoism in relation to Marxist theory, and its development of the theory, the dominant strain of scholarship emphasized the ‘break’ and ‘deviation’ of Maoism from Marxist orthodoxy, based on textual comparisons. In a different vein, some ‘radical’ or ‘critical’ leftwing scholars paid attention to Maoist revolutionary objectives with the aim of shedding light on the liberatory potential of Maoism in the midst of what they viewed as the anarchy of the capitalist world.
      In light of the diverse interpretations and appropriations of Maoism, this paper does not limit itself to Mao’s thought, theories, and orientations as evidenced in his works, but includes his revolutionary praxis and policies, the governance system of his era, and the explicit and implicit symbols embedded in all these facets of the era. Today’s continuing appropriations of Mao and Maoism implies that the thought and practice of Mao Zedong has a fertile afterlife. In that today’s Maoism is becoming both an alternative to capitalism and a competitive means of capitalist achievement, Maoism has not ceased to expand its range of associations and applications. On its centenary, though the CCP is an integral part of global capitalism and an advocate of free trade, the resilience of the unitary Party-state is likely related to the party"s flexible appropriation of Mao and Maoism.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 마오의 혁명과 마오이즘의 기원
      • Ⅲ. 마오시대의 마오이즘
      • Ⅳ. 오늘의 마오이즘의 지형
      • Ⅴ. 결어
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 마오의 혁명과 마오이즘의 기원
      • Ⅲ. 마오시대의 마오이즘
      • Ⅳ. 오늘의 마오이즘의 지형
      • Ⅴ. 결어
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 劉少奇, "劉少奇選集, 上卷" 人民出版社 1981

      2 洛甫(張聞天), "論中國革命的工農民主專制" (40,41,48) : 1932

      3 폴 리쾨르, "해석이론" 서광사 2016

      4 박상수, "중국혁명과 비밀결사" 심산 2006

      5 T. 뢰트바이트, "중국 소비에트운동사" 고려원 1994

      6 박상수, "階級과 共和 ― 중국공산당의 ‘共和國’ 구상의 변천 ―" 중국근현대사학회 (52) : 93-124, 2011

      7 中共中央文獻硏究室, "關於建國以來黨的若幹歷史問題的決義註釋本(修正)" 人民出版社 1985

      8 吳偉, "鄧小平與《黨和國家領導制度的改革》" (10) : 2014

      9 吳偉, "鄧小平爲什麼重提政治體制改革(2014年2月24日)"

      10 鄧小平, "鄧小平文選, 第2卷" 人民出版社 1994

      1 劉少奇, "劉少奇選集, 上卷" 人民出版社 1981

      2 洛甫(張聞天), "論中國革命的工農民主專制" (40,41,48) : 1932

      3 폴 리쾨르, "해석이론" 서광사 2016

      4 박상수, "중국혁명과 비밀결사" 심산 2006

      5 T. 뢰트바이트, "중국 소비에트운동사" 고려원 1994

      6 박상수, "階級과 共和 ― 중국공산당의 ‘共和國’ 구상의 변천 ―" 중국근현대사학회 (52) : 93-124, 2011

      7 中共中央文獻硏究室, "關於建國以來黨的若幹歷史問題的決義註釋本(修正)" 人民出版社 1985

      8 吳偉, "鄧小平與《黨和國家領導制度的改革》" (10) : 2014

      9 吳偉, "鄧小平爲什麼重提政治體制改革(2014年2月24日)"

      10 鄧小平, "鄧小平文選, 第2卷" 人民出版社 1994

      11 鄧小平, "鄧小平文選, 第2卷" 人民出版社 1994

      12 鄧小平, "鄧小平文選, 第2卷" 人民出版社 1994

      13 鄧小平, "鄧小平文選, 第2卷" 人民出版社 1994

      14 鄧中夏, "鄧中夏文集" 人民出版社 1983

      15 鄧中夏, "鄧中夏文集" 人民出版社 1983

      16 習近平, "談治國理政" 2014

      17 任劍濤, "解讀“新左派”" (1) : 1999

      18 胡清寧, "解放初期中小學教師的思想學習活動--以江蘇地區爲中心" (4) : 2005

      19 "華西天地江蘇省江陰市華西村采訪紀實(2017.6.1.)"

      20 "胡锦涛在纪念毛泽东诞辰110周年座谈会的讲话"

      21 胡喬木, "胡喬木回憶毛澤東" 人民出版社 1994

      22 高華, "紅太陽是怎樣升起的 : 延安整風運動的來龍去脈" 中文大學出版社 2000

      23 鄧拓, "紀念七一, 全黨學習掌握毛澤東主義"

      24 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白文集(政治理論編), 第4卷" 人民出版社 1993

      25 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白文集(政治理論編), 第4卷" 人民出版社 1993

      26 崔金珂, "當代 “毛澤東左派”思想分析" 北京大學 2013

      27 郭德宏, "王明年譜" 社會科學文獻出版社 2014

      28 趙紫陽, "沿著有中國特色的社會主義道路前進"

      29 曹曙, "沿著公社的道路繼續前進 紀念毛主席誕辰126周年"

      30 "河南農村耗資3百萬建36. 6米高毛澤東像(組圖)"

      31 "求是』雜志編輯部, 堅定不移聽黨話跟黨走"

      32 毛澤東, "民眾的大聯合" 湖南學生連合會 (二四) : 1919

      33 "毛澤東的後代走上街頭(2002.3.25.)"

      34 毛澤東, "毛澤東思想萬歲(1949-1957)" 1968

      35 王武, "毛澤東反對提“毛澤東主義”" (6) : 1995

      36 中共中央硏究室, "毛澤東傳(1949-1976)" 中央文獻出版社 2003

      37 李東朗, "毛澤東“最後決定權”的來龍去脈"

      38 "春秋筆中共紀念毛澤東誕辰 江澤民時代達到頂峰"

      39 李憲源, "新毛主義重建中國方案(征求意見稿)"

      40 喬晞華, "文革群眾運動的動員、分裂和滅亡 -- 以社會運動學視角" 美國華憶出版社 2020

      41 韓德強, "文化大革命的失敗與理論創新(2002.12.25.)"

      42 趙紫陽, "改革曆程" 新世紀出版社 2009

      43 蕭功秦, "思潮: 中國“新左派”及其影響" 中國社會科學出版社 2003

      44 韓德強, "思潮: 中國 “新左派”及其影響" 中國社會科學出版社 2003

      45 毛澤東, "建黨以來重要文獻選編, 第5冊" 中央文獻出版社 2011

      46 毛澤東, "建黨以來重要文獻選編, 第5冊" 中央文獻出版社 2011

      47 江大偉, "建國以來黨對毛澤東思想認識的主要影響因素探析" (3) : 2010

      48 毛澤東, "建國以來毛澤東文稿, 第3冊" 中央文獻出版社 1989

      49 中共中央文獻研究室, "建國以來毛澤東文稿 第3冊" 中央文獻出版社 1989

      50 盛葉欣, "延安時期鄧拓對馬克思主義中國化的曆史貢獻" (7) : 2007

      51 張如心, "布爾什維克的敎育家" (16) : 1941

      52 王明, "學習毛澤東" 2 (2): 1940

      53 張如心, "學習和掌握毛澤東的理論和策略"

      54 印紅標, "失蹤者的足跡 文化大革命期間的青年思潮" 香港中文大學出版社 2009

      55 張宏良, "大眾民主是現代社會最根本的政治基石 關於《中國何時成爲一個“政治民族”》一文的按語"

      56 胡偉, "國家治理體系和治理能力現代化的綱領性文獻--紀念鄧小平《黨和國家領導制度的改革》發表40周年(2020.8.19.)"

      57 何毅亭, "四十年改革開放與中國特色社會主義(2018.12.7.)"

      58 張宏良, "同時掛在天上的太陽和月亮簡評十八屆三中全會《決定》"

      59 "南街村 在毛澤東思想的指引下, 走出了屬於自己的共產主義(2021.3.22.)"

      60 江澤民, "十五大以來重要文獻選編(下)" 中央文獻出版社 2011

      61 江西省檔案館, "井岡山革命根據地史料選編" 江西人民出版社 1986

      62 江西省檔案館, "井岡山革命根據地史料選編" 江西人民出版社 1986

      63 張業賞, "中華學人文革論文集(三): 學校和地方" 美國華憶出版社 2019

      64 江西省檔案館中共江西省委黨校黨史研究室, "中央革命根據地史料選編, 下冊" 江西人民出版社 1982

      65 江西省檔案館中共江西省委黨校黨史研究室, "中央革命根據地史料選編 下冊" 江西人民出版社 1982

      66 甘陽, "中國道路: 三十年與六十年, 『讀書』, 2007年 第6期; 曠新年, 毛澤東: 一份沉重的遺產 (2000.10.8.)"

      67 毛澤東, "中國農民中各階級的分析及其對於革命的態度(1926.1)" 1 (1): 1926

      68 毛澤東, "中國社會各階級的分析(1926.2)" 1 (1): 1926

      69 多人發言, "中國政治體制改革三十年反思與前瞻" 香港中文大學 中國硏究服務中心 2009 : 2009

      70 苒苒, "中國左翼青年的崛起和官方的打壓(2018.12.28.)"

      71 石川禎浩, "中國共産黨成立史" 中國社會科學出版社 2006

      72 王稼祥, "中國共產黨與中國民族解放的道路"

      73 沈志華, "中共八大爲什麼不提“毛澤東思想”" (5) : 2005

      74 齊得平, "中共八大未提“毛澤東思想”的若干情況" (5) : 1996

      75 "中共中央關於加強黨的執政能力建設的決定(2004年9月19日中國共產黨第十六屆中央委員會第四次全體會議通過)"

      76 中央檔案館, 中共中央文獻硏究室, "中共中央文件選集, 第24冊(1956.9-12)" 人民出版社 2013

      77 中國共産黨第一個綱領, 中央檔案館, "中共中央文件選集, 第1冊" 中共中央黨校出版社 1989

      78 中央檔案館, "中共中央文件選集, 第1冊" 中共中央黨校出版社 1989

      79 中央檔案館, "中共中央文件選集, 第15冊" 中共中央黨校出版社 1991

      80 毛澤東, "中共中央文件選集, 第11冊"

      81 吳偉, "中共“十三大”前後的政治體制改革, 領導者, 總第43期, 2011.12" 香港中文大學中國硏究服務中心

      82 Zhao, Suisheng, "Xi Jinping’s Maoist Revival" 27 (27): 2016

      83 Béja, Jean-Philippe, "The Use of Mao and the Chongqing Model" City University of Hong Kong Press 2015

      84 Fairbank, John K., "The United States and China" Harvard University Press 1948

      85 Schram, Stuart R., "The Thought of Mao Tse-Tung" Cambridge University Press 1989

      86 Anderlini, Jamil, "The Return of Mao: A New Threat to China’s Politics"

      87 Dirlik, Arif, "The Origins of Chinese Communism" Oxford University Press 1989

      88 Lam, Willy, "The Maoist Revival and the Conservative Turn in Chinese Politics" 2012 (2012): 2012

      89 Wittfogel, Karl A., "The Legend of ‘Maoism" (1) : 1960

      90 Wittfogel, Karl A., "The Historical Position of Communist China: Doctrine and Reality" 16 (16): 1954

      91 Schwartz, Benjamin I., "The Essence of Marxism Revisited-A Response" 2 (2): 1976

      92 Lanza, Fabio, "The End of Concern: Maoist China, Activism, and Asian Studies" Duke University Press 2017

      93 Wylie, Raymond F., "The Emergence of Maoism: Mao Tse tung, Ch'en Po ta, and the Search, for Chinese Theory: 1935 1945" Stanford University Press 1980

      94 MacFarquhar, Roderick, "The China Questions: Critical Insights into a Rising Power" Harvard University Press 2018

      95 Perry, Elizabeth J.,, "Studying Chinese Politics: Farewell to Revolution?" (57) : 2007

      96 MacFarquhar, Roderick, "Stuart Reynolds Schram, 1924 2012" (212) : 2012

      97 Blanchette, Jude, "Still Holding High Mao’s Banner"

      98 Schram, Stuart R., "Some Reflections on the Pfeffer-Walder Revolution in China Studies" 3 (3): 1977

      99 Hartford, Kathleen, "Single Sparks:: China's Rural Revolutions" M.E. Sharpe 1989

      100 Wei, William, "Single Sparks:: China's Rural Revolutions" M.E. Sharpe 1989

      101 Barmé, Geremie, "Shades of Mao: The Posthumous Cult of the Great Leader" M. E. Sharpe 1996

      102 Knight, Nick, "Rethinking Mao: Exploration in Mao Zedong’s Thought" Lexington Books 2007

      103 Piketty, Thomas, "Responding to Chinese challenge with democratic socialism"

      104 Wittfogel, Karl A., "Peking’s ‘Independence’"

      105 Johnson, Chalmers A., "Peasant Nationalism and Communist Power: The Emergence of Revolutionary China, 1937-1945" Stanford University Press 1962

      106 van de Ven, Hans J., "New Perspectives on the Chinese Communist Revolution" M.E. Sharpe 1995

      107 Meisner, Maurice J, "Marxism, Maoism, and Utopianism: Eight Essays" University of Wisconsin Press 1982

      108 Walder, Andrew G., "Marxism, Maoism, and Social Change: A Reexamination of the Voluntarism" 3 (3): 1977

      109 d'Encausse, Helene, "Marxism and Asia" The Penguin Press 1969

      110 Schwartz, Benjamin I., "Marx and Lenin in China" 18 (18): 1949

      111 Selden, Mark, "Mark, The Yanan Way in Revolutionary China" Harvard University Press 1971

      112 Huang, Chang-tai, "Mao’s New World : Political Culture in the Early People’s Republic" Cornell University Press 2011

      113 Buckley, Chris, "Maoists in China, Given New Life, Attack Dissent"

      114 Lovell, Julia, "Maoism : A Global History" Random House 2019

      115 Pfeffer, Richard M., "Mao and Mark in the Marxist Leninist Tradition" 2 (2): 1976

      116 Schram, Stuart R., "Mao Tse-toung" Armand Colin 1972

      117 Bourseiller, Christophe, "Les Maoïstes: La folle histoire des gardes rouges français" Points 2008

      118 Meisner, Maurice J., "Leninism and Maoism: Some Populist Perspectives on Marxism-Leninism in China" (45) : 1971

      119 Hu, Chi-Hsi, "L'Armée rouge et l'ascension de Mao" Éditions de l'EHESS 1982

      120 Weber, Isabella, "How China Escaped Shock Therapy: The Market Reform Debate" Routledge 2021

      121 Wakeman Jr. Frederic E., "History and Will: Philosophical Perspectives of Mao Tse-tung’s Thought" University of California Press 1973

      122 Schram, Stuart R., "Foundations and Limits of State Power in China" Chinese University Press 1987

      123 Perry, Elizabeth J., "Debating Maoism in Contemporary China: Reflections on Benjamin I. Schwartz, Chinese Communism and the Rise of Mao" 19 (19): 2021

      124 Dirlik, Arif, "Critical Perspectives on Mao Zedong's Thought" Humanities Press International 1997

      125 Dirlik, Arif, "Critical Perspectives on Mao Zedong's Thought" Humanities Press International 1997

      126 Koschmann, J. Victor, "Critical Perspectives on Mao Zedong's Thought" Humanities Press International 1997

      127 Cheek, Timothy, "Critical Introduction to Mao" Cambridge University Press 2010

      128 Schwartz, Benjamin I., "Communism and China: Ideology in Flux" Harvard University Press 22-42, 1968

      129 Schwartz, Benjamin I., "Chinese Communism and the Rise of Mao" Harvard University Press 1951

      130 Economy, Elizabeth, "China’s Neo-Maoist Moment: How Xi Jinping Is Using China’s Past toAccomplish What His Predecessors Could Not"

      131 Hernández, Javier C., "China’s Leaders Confront an Unlikely Foe: Ardent Young Communists"

      132 Shambaugh, David, "China’s Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation" University of California Press 2008

      133 Fairbank, John K., "Chinabound: Fifty Year Memoir" Haper and Row 1982

      134 Buckley, Chris, "China's Leftists Dig in for Fight over Bo Xilai"

      135 Kelley, Robin D.G., "Black like Mao: Red China and Black Revolution" 1 (1): 1999

      136 Selden, Mark, "America’s Asia: Dissenting Essays on Asian-American Relations" Pantheon 1969

      137 Fraser, Ronald, "A Student Generation in Revolt An International Oral History" Pantheon Books 1988

      138 Wakeman Jr. Frederic E., "A Response" 3 (3): 1977

      139 van de Ven, Hans J., "A Critical Introduction to Mao" Cambridge University Press 2010

      140 Cook, Alexander C., "A Critical Introduction to Mao" Cambridge University Press 2010

      141 박상수, "1920년대 말 ~ 30년대 전반 中國 소비에트經濟論 분석" (60) : 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.64 1.64 1.17
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.99 0.87 2.008 0.29
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼