The Effect of Export on R&D Cost Behavior: Evidence from Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose – This research intends to find out whether R&D cost stickiness shows differentiated aspects depending on exports in Korea. A cost behavior that indicates a lower rate of costs decrease when sales decrease than the rate of costs increase when sales increase is called cost stickiness. This sticky cost behavior is caused by considering the adjusting costs. This study aims to empirically verify that R&D cost stickiness is greater in export firms than in non-export firms. We also investigate the effect of exports on R&D cost stickiness is nonlinear.
Design/methodology – We obtain data for the analysis from Kis-Value and TS2000 from 2012 to 2020.
This study tests for R&D cost stickiness of exports using the cost stickiness model developed by Anderson et al. (2003) that is used in a lot of prior literature. To explore the nonlinear behavior of R&D cost stickiness we include a quadratic term of exports in our model.
Findings – The results of our analysis are as follows. First, we observed that R&D costs of export firms are more sticky than that of non-export firms. Our result indicated that export firms are less likely to reduce R&D costs in decreasing sales periods in preparation for future sales recovery. Second, our empirical evidence shows that export firms view R&D costs much favorably. However, we hypothesize that the effect of export intensity on R&D costs may not necessarily be linear. Our result shows the effect of exports intensity on R&D stickiness is thus nonlinear, forming a reverse U-shaped curve.
When export intensity exceeds a certain threshold, the growth rate of R&D costs appears to be viewed negatively. Firms with relatively high export intensity do not support R&D costs, viewing them as taking away firms’ resources from other more productive costs. On the contrary, those with export intensity under the threshold view R&D costs as beneficial and therefore promote further R&D costs when revenue decreases.
Originality/value – The results of this research can contribute academically to the expansion of empirical research on R&D cost stickiness. R&D cost stickiness varies by industry. As a result of our research, the managers of export firms recognize the importance of R&D to lead innovation. We expected that this research contributes to further studies on R&D costs and cost stickiness. Second, this research has implications from a business perspectives. Our findings of export firms’ R&D stickiness suggest that export firms’ managers should consider keeping the stickiness of R&D when revenue decreases because it is essential for exporting firms to maintain their R&D stickiness to secure longterm competitiveness. R&D stickiness can be used on a practical basis to emphasize the need for continuous investment in exporting firms’ R&D activities.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 권세원 ; 최세라 ; 김범준 ; 이문영, "재벌기업의 연구개발투자 비대칭성에 대한 연구" 한국세무학회 19 (19): 209-230, 2018

2 문호은 ; 홍철규, "원가행태의 비대칭성과 산업별 특성 차이에 대한 종합적 분석" 한국관리회계학회 10 (10): 1-38, 2010

3 홍영은 ; 김수진 ; 박종국, "원가하방경직성은 주가급락에 영향을 미치는가?" 한국관리회계학회 20 (20): 1-26, 2020

4 조성표 ; 박선영, "연구개발지출 관련 연구들에 대한 검토 및 향후 연구방향" 한국회계학회 38 (38): 427-469, 2013

5 임정대, "수출이 기업혁신에 미치는 영향" 한국무역학회 44 (44): 227-252, 2019

6 문혜원 ; 고창열 ; 정훈, "디지털 기업의 연구개발비 하방경직성 연구" 한국회계정보학회 38 (38): 27-45, 2020

7 장승현 ; 백태영, "기업의 경영조건이 비대칭적 원가행태에 미치는 영향: 원가관리와 이익조정의 역할" 한국회계학회 34 (34): 71-107, 2009

8 Aboody, D., "The Value Relevance of Intangibles : The Case of Software Capitalization" 36 : 161-191, 1998

9 오현진 ; 최세라, "The Role of CEO Ability in Determining R&D Investment Behavior among High Technology Firms in Korea" 정보통신정책학회 28 (28): 79-110, 2021

10 Bublitz, B., "The Information in Discretionary Outlays; Advertising, Research and Development" 64 : 108-124, 1989

11 지상현 ; 권일숙 ; 안상봉, "The Effects of Managerial Attributes on Cost Stickiness: An Empirical Analysis of Korean Exporters and Implications for Start-ups" 한국무역학회 25 (25): 196-219, 2021

12 Li, W., "The Effect of Management Control Mechanisms through Risk-taking Incentives on Asymmetric Cost Behavior" 1-25, 2020

13 Maican, F., "The Dynamic Impact of Exporting on Firm R&D Investment" 2020

14 Cooper, R., "The Design of Cost Management Systems: Text, Cases, and Readings" Prentice Hall 1998

15 Lev, B., "The Capitalization, Amortization, and Value-Relevance of R&D" 21 (21): 107-138, 1996

16 Chen, C., "The Agency Problem, Corporate Governance, and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, and Administrative Costs" 29 (29): 252-282, 2012

17 Sougiannis, T., "The Accounting Based Valuation of Corporate R&D" 69 (69): 44-69, 1994

18 Sougiannis, T., "The Accounting Based Valuation of Corporate R&D" 69 (69): 44-69, 1994

19 Prabowo, R., "State Ownership, Socio-political Factors, and Labor Cost Stickiness" 27 (27): 771-796, 2018

20 Ciftci, M., "Scale Effects of R&D as Reflected in Earnings and Returns" 52 (52): 62-80, 2011

21 Scherer, F., "R&D, patents, and productivity" University of Chicago Press 417-464, 1984

22 Govindarajan, V., "It’s Time to Stop Treating R&D as a Discretionary Expenditure" 1 : 2019

23 Han, S., "Is Cost Stickiness Associated with Management Earnings Forecasts?" 28 (28): 173-211, 2019

24 Hirschey, M., "Intangible Capital Aspects of Advertising and R&D Expenditures" 30 (30): 375-390, 1982

25 Ciftci, M., "Implications of Cost Behavior for Analysts’Earnings Forecasts" 28 (28): 57-80, 2016

26 김범준, "IT산업에서의 연구개발비 하방경직성" 글로벌경영학회 16 (16): 97-114, 2019

27 Zhang, L., "IPO Over-funding and Cost Stickiness" 1 (1): 2019

28 Lin, F, "Exporting and Innovation: Theory and Firm-Level Evidence from the People’s Republic of China (No. 111)" ADB 2013

29 Chamber, D., "Evidence on the Usefulness of “No-discretion”Capitalization and Amortization Rules for Research and Development Cost" University of Texas 1999

30 Banker, R., "Employment Protection Legislation, Adjustment Costs and Cross-country Differences in Cost Behavior" 55 (55): 111-127, 2013

31 Balakrishnan, R., "Does Capacity Utilization Affect the"Stickiness"of Cost?" 19 (19): 283-300, 2004

32 Bugeja, M., "Cost Stickiness in Australia : Characteristics and Determinants" 25 (25): 248-261, 2015

33 Tang, L., "Cost Stickiness and Stock Price Crash Risk : Evidence from China" 1-26, 2020

34 Anderson, M., "Cost Behavior and Fundamental Analysis o f SG&A C ost s" 22 (22): 1-28, 2007

35 Weiss, D., "Cost Behavior and Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts" 85 (85): 1441-1471, 2010

36 An, T., "Asymmetrical Behavior of Manufacturing Costs" 33 (33): 789-807, 2004

37 Sun, R., "Asymmetric Cost Behavior and Investment in R&D : Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Listed Companies" 11 : 1785-, 2019

38 Anderson, M., "Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs Sticky?" 41 (41): 47-63, 2003

39 Noreen, E., "Are Overhead Costs Strictly Proportional to Activity? Evidence from Hospital Departments" 17 (17): 255-278, 1994

40 Subramaniam, C., "Additional evidence on the sticky behavior of costs" 26 : 275-305, 2016

41 Subramaniam, C., "Additional Evidence on the Sticky Behavior of Costs, TCU Working paper"

42 윤소라, "A Study on Research and Development Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Technology Companies" 한국경영학회 50 (50): 861-884, 2021

43 Calleja, K., "A Note on Cost Stickiness : Some International Comparisons" 17 (17): 127-140, 2006

44 Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "2022 Trade Outlook and Promotion Measures"