RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      磻溪 유형원의 대동법인식 = 조선후기 개혁론의 ‘두 가지 입장’대해서

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60134406

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The two great wars against the Japanese and the Manchu in the late 1500s and the early 1600s led the Koreans to be involved in a series of debates aiming at the rejuvenation of the dynasty in trouble. Existing studies tend to understand that depending on their different socioeconomic bases, the debaters were divided into two different groups in terms of the goal and method of the reform. In particular, the tribute tax reform was the hottest issue and thus mentioned in detail by a number of scholars such as Yu Hy?ngw?n in provinces as well as officials in the central government. With emphasis on a new understanding of Yu's discourse on the tribute tax reform, this paper examines whether Yu's proposal was really a product of his socioeconomic situation which distinguished him from other reformers.
      Most proposals for the tribute tax reform of the time took it for granted that the government should first estimate the amount of possible tax in-come and then make a budget: the principle of yangip wich'ul (量入爲出). To all the debaters, the Taedong Law was understood as the most possible plan for the realization of the adult male field system (ch?nj?nje 丁田制), the ideal land system in antiquity, as well as the principle per se. Although Yu seems to have not fully supported the Taedong reform, his point was not an opposition to the reform principle itself but a criticism of the reality in which the principle was compromised and even violated. Since the late 1500s, in short, the debaters and their proposals differed from each other in the extent of the application of the principle to the reality, not in the methodology of the application.
      번역하기

      The two great wars against the Japanese and the Manchu in the late 1500s and the early 1600s led the Koreans to be involved in a series of debates aiming at the rejuvenation of the dynasty in trouble. Existing studies tend to understand that depending...

      The two great wars against the Japanese and the Manchu in the late 1500s and the early 1600s led the Koreans to be involved in a series of debates aiming at the rejuvenation of the dynasty in trouble. Existing studies tend to understand that depending on their different socioeconomic bases, the debaters were divided into two different groups in terms of the goal and method of the reform. In particular, the tribute tax reform was the hottest issue and thus mentioned in detail by a number of scholars such as Yu Hy?ngw?n in provinces as well as officials in the central government. With emphasis on a new understanding of Yu's discourse on the tribute tax reform, this paper examines whether Yu's proposal was really a product of his socioeconomic situation which distinguished him from other reformers.
      Most proposals for the tribute tax reform of the time took it for granted that the government should first estimate the amount of possible tax in-come and then make a budget: the principle of yangip wich'ul (量入爲出). To all the debaters, the Taedong Law was understood as the most possible plan for the realization of the adult male field system (ch?nj?nje 丁田制), the ideal land system in antiquity, as well as the principle per se. Although Yu seems to have not fully supported the Taedong reform, his point was not an opposition to the reform principle itself but a criticism of the reality in which the principle was compromised and even violated. Since the late 1500s, in short, the debaters and their proposals differed from each other in the extent of the application of the principle to the reality, not in the methodology of the application.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 대동법과 量入爲出
      • Ⅲ. 유형원의 공물변통론
      • Ⅳ. 유형원의 대동법 비판
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 대동법과 量入爲出
      • Ⅲ. 유형원의 공물변통론
      • Ⅳ. 유형원의 대동법 비판
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • [참고문헌]
      • [Abstract]
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼