RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      집단적 노동관계법에서 사용자 책임의 확대  :  간접고용을 중심으로 = The Liability of User-Employers in the Collective Labor Relations

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45003300

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In the multilateral employment relations such as temporary work or employee-dispatching, there are plural employers(the user- employer and the supplier-employer) at the same time. In indirect employment relations the temporary workers have relations w...

      In the multilateral employment relations such as temporary work or employee-dispatching, there are plural employers(the user- employer and the supplier-employer) at the same time. In indirect employment relations the temporary workers have relations with both the supplier-employer and the user-employer. In general it has been argued that the temporary worker has no contract with the user-employer and the user employer has no liability of employer This. legal structure of temporary work make employers evade the liability of employer easily
      The judicial precedents have been concentrating on the existence of employment contract between the user-employer and the dispatched worker and Judging the existence of contract by whether the user-employer control a Job "directly and concretely" or not In this viewpoint they can't find the real employment relations in multilateral employment
      In the respect of collective labor relations, the temporary workers also have relations with both supplier-employer and user-employer. In many cases, the user-employer control the terms and the conditions of employment Also the user-employers infringe the right of collective labor law such as interfering to organize a labor union or terminating the employee dispatching contract
      Therefore in the relation of temporary work, the liability of employers should not be limited as one of supplier-employers. If the user-employers could control the working conditions and infringe the basic right in the collecrive labor relations, they should be interpreted as employers. Also it is necessary to treat the user-employer as a partyof umfair labor practice.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
      • Ⅱ. 논의의 범위
      • Ⅲ. 집단적 노동관계법에서 사용자 책임의 확대
      • Ⅳ. 단결권과 사용자 책임
      • Ⅴ. 단체교섭권과 사용자 책임
      • Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
      • Ⅱ. 논의의 범위
      • Ⅲ. 집단적 노동관계법에서 사용자 책임의 확대
      • Ⅳ. 단결권과 사용자 책임
      • Ⅴ. 단체교섭권과 사용자 책임
      • Ⅵ. 단체행동권과 사용자 책임
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼