동도서기론자의 ‘民富國强’론과 민중 인식 ≪한성주보≫를 중심으로 = MinBu-GukGang(民富國强) Theory and People Recognition of DongDo-SeoGi(東道西器) Theorist

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

DongDo-SeoGi(東道西器, Eastern morality and Western technology) theorist wanted construct the modern independent state successfully as a attaining MinBu-GukGang(民富國强, people is rich and nation is strong), in order to overcome the crisis of the nation and defend the aggression of the outside power.
They considered seriously the role of the people in the modern society and thought that there is not a possibility of accomplishing a national wealth and power without MinBu(民富).
They thought the people of Korea that to be foolish is dumb, therefore they did not consider that people immediately there is a possibility becoming the master of MinBu(民富). They accordingly educated the people and after changing with the modern worker, the people becoming the master of MinBu.
They opposed the hereditariness of slaves and criticized the status system in compliance with the blood inherits. But they did not assert the abolition of slave system and status system.
They considered the people with the master of MinBu(民富), it’s point was as a charge person in the economic side, did not consider as a charge person in the democratic institution and the right to vote side. But they regarding the people as the master is very important in historically.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

DongDo-SeoGi(東道西器, Eastern morality and Western technology) theorist wanted construct the modern independent state successfully as a attaining MinBu-GukGang(民富國强, people is rich and nation is strong), in order to overcome the crisis of the nation and defend the aggression of the outside power.
They considered seriously the role of the people in the modern society and thought that there is not a possibility of accomplishing a national wealth and power without MinBu(民富).
They thought the people of Korea that to be foolish is dumb, therefore they did not consider that people immediately there is a possibility becoming the master of MinBu(民富). They accordingly educated the people and after changing with the modern worker, the people becoming the master of MinBu.
They opposed the hereditariness of slaves and criticized the status system in compliance with the blood inherits. But they did not assert the abolition of slave system and status system.
They considered the people with the master of MinBu(民富), it’s point was as a charge person in the economic side, did not consider as a charge person in the democratic institution and the right to vote side. But they regarding the people as the master is very important in historically.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 권오영, "신기선의 동도서기론연구" 1 : 1984

2 박정심, "신기선(申箕善)의 ？？유학경위(儒學經緯)？？을 통해 본 동도서기론(東道西器論)의 사상적 특징(思想的 特徵)Ⅰ" 한국역사연구회 60 (60): 315-343, 2006

3 한철호, "시무개화파의 개혁구상과 정치활동 in: 한국근대 개화사상과 개화운동" 신서원 1998

4 강만길, "동도서기론이란 무엇인가" 9 : 1982

5 장영숙, "동도서기론의 정치적 역할과 변화" 한국역사연구회 60 : 2006

6 김문용, "동도서기론의 논리와 전개 in: 한국근대 개화사상과 개화운동" 신서원 1998

7 "≪한성주보≫, 『고종실록』, 『梅泉野錄』, 『續陰晴史』, 『西遊見聞』"

8 권오영, "?동도서기론의 구조와 그 전개?, ≪한국사시민강좌≫ 7, 일조각, 1990"

9 노대환, "19세기 동도서기론 형성과정 연구" 서울대학교 1999