RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Development of collaborative spirit indices: The case of South Korea’s maritime industry

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108594185

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study aims to evaluate the extent of collaboration between shippers and shipping companies in South Korea. Bespoke cooperative and collaborative spirit indices (CCSIs) reflect the conceptual differentiation between cooperation and collaboration, as well as a more comprehensive conceptualisation. Shipping companies registered in South Korea returned 167 usable responses. CCSIs were developed through exploratory factor analysis weighting methods, and differences among CCSIs by vessel type and contract period were examined using multivariate analysis of variance. CCSIs indicate that powerful supply chain members resist two-way communication, mutuality, distributive fairness, and long-term relationships. This is one of the first studies to operationalise the key concepts of cooperation and collaboration in terms of the maritime industry, providing the basis for future research in other supply chains despite a single informant attribute. Based on the CCSI scores, managerial and political initiatives are discussed to reduce barriers to interaction and ameliorate the CCSI level between supply chain members. The research provides insights into the extent of cooperation and collaboration by initially establishing CCSIs in the maritime industry, which will support strategic approaches to supply chain members.
      © 2022 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Korean Association of Shipping and Logistics, Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
      CC_BY_NC_ND_4.0
      번역하기

      This study aims to evaluate the extent of collaboration between shippers and shipping companies in South Korea. Bespoke cooperative and collaborative spirit indices (CCSIs) reflect the conceptual differentiation between cooperation and collaboration, ...

      This study aims to evaluate the extent of collaboration between shippers and shipping companies in South Korea. Bespoke cooperative and collaborative spirit indices (CCSIs) reflect the conceptual differentiation between cooperation and collaboration, as well as a more comprehensive conceptualisation. Shipping companies registered in South Korea returned 167 usable responses. CCSIs were developed through exploratory factor analysis weighting methods, and differences among CCSIs by vessel type and contract period were examined using multivariate analysis of variance. CCSIs indicate that powerful supply chain members resist two-way communication, mutuality, distributive fairness, and long-term relationships. This is one of the first studies to operationalise the key concepts of cooperation and collaboration in terms of the maritime industry, providing the basis for future research in other supply chains despite a single informant attribute. Based on the CCSI scores, managerial and political initiatives are discussed to reduce barriers to interaction and ameliorate the CCSI level between supply chain members. The research provides insights into the extent of cooperation and collaboration by initially establishing CCSIs in the maritime industry, which will support strategic approaches to supply chain members.
      © 2022 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Korean Association of Shipping and Logistics, Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
      CC_BY_NC_ND_4.0

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference) 논문관계도

      1 Barratt, M., "Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain" 9 (9): 30-42, 2004

      2 Gardner, J. T., "Understanding shipper-carrier and shipper-warehouser relationships : partnerships revisited" 15 (15): 121-143, 1994

      3 Konovsky, M. A., "Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations" 26 (26): 489-511, 2000

      4 Kwon, I. W. G., "Trust, commitment and relationships in supply chain management : a path analysis" 10 (10): 26-33, 2005

      5 Ahmed, M. U., "Towards a classification of supply chain relationships : a routine based perspective" 22 (22): 341-374, 2017

      6 Wang, C. L., "The significance of trust and renqing in the long-term orientation of Chinese business-to-business relationships" 37 (37): 819-824, 2008

      7 Acedo, F. J., "The resource-based theory : dissemination and main trends" 27 : 621-636, 2006

      8 Dyer, J. H., "The relational view : cooperative strategy and sources of interorganisational competitive advantage" 23 (23): 660-679, 1998

      9 Putnam, R., "The prosperous community : Social capital and public life" 4 : 35-42, 1993

      10 Seo, Y. J., "The influence of supply chain collaboration on collaborative advantage and port performance in maritime logistics" 19 (19): 562-582, 2016

      1 Barratt, M., "Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain" 9 (9): 30-42, 2004

      2 Gardner, J. T., "Understanding shipper-carrier and shipper-warehouser relationships : partnerships revisited" 15 (15): 121-143, 1994

      3 Konovsky, M. A., "Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations" 26 (26): 489-511, 2000

      4 Kwon, I. W. G., "Trust, commitment and relationships in supply chain management : a path analysis" 10 (10): 26-33, 2005

      5 Ahmed, M. U., "Towards a classification of supply chain relationships : a routine based perspective" 22 (22): 341-374, 2017

      6 Wang, C. L., "The significance of trust and renqing in the long-term orientation of Chinese business-to-business relationships" 37 (37): 819-824, 2008

      7 Acedo, F. J., "The resource-based theory : dissemination and main trends" 27 : 621-636, 2006

      8 Dyer, J. H., "The relational view : cooperative strategy and sources of interorganisational competitive advantage" 23 (23): 660-679, 1998

      9 Putnam, R., "The prosperous community : Social capital and public life" 4 : 35-42, 1993

      10 Seo, Y. J., "The influence of supply chain collaboration on collaborative advantage and port performance in maritime logistics" 19 (19): 562-582, 2016

      11 Seo, Y. J., "The impact of innovativeness on supply chain performance: is supply chain integration a missing link?" 19 (19): 733-746, 2014

      12 Kumar, N., "The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers" 32 (32): 54-65, 1995

      13 Kuo, S. Y., "The effects of dynamic capabilities, service capabilities, competitive advantage, and organizational performance in container shipping" 95 : 356-371, 2017

      14 KITA, "The damage of shippers from Hanjin collapse" Korea International Trade Association 2017

      15 Fransoo, J. C., "The critical role of ocean container transport in global supply chain performance" 22 (22): 253-268, 2013

      16 Morgan, R. M., "The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing" 58 (58): 20-38, 1994

      17 Simatupang, T. M., "The collaboration index : a measure for supply chain collaboration" 35 (35): 44-62, 2005

      18 Chen, J. V., "The antecedent factors on trust and commitment in supply chain relationships" 33 (33): 262-270, 2011

      19 Lee, H. Y., "Supply chain integration and logistics performance : the role of supply chain dynamism" 27 (27): 668-685, 2016

      20 Nassirnia, P., "Supply chain integration and chain efficiency : the importance of changing perspective toward whole chain integration" 1 (1): 13-23, 2013

      21 Cao, M., "Supply chain collaborative advantage : a firm’s perspective" 128 (128): 358-367, 2010

      22 Min, S., "Supply chain collaboration: what's happening?" 16 (16): 237-256, 2005

      23 Kumar, G., "Supply chain collaboration index : an instrument to measure the depth of collaboration" 21 (21): 184-204, 2014

      24 Cao, M., "Supply chain collaboration : impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance" 29 (29): 163-180, 2011

      25 Cao, M., "Supply chain collaboration : conceptualisation and instrument development" 48 (48): 6613-6635, 2010

      26 Kou, Y., "Strategic capacity competition and overcapacity in Shipping" 43 (43): 389-406, 2016

      27 Slack, B., "Strategic alliances in the container shipping industry : A global perspective" 29 (29): 65-76, 2002

      28 Fleming, A., "Stakeholder trust and holistic fishery sustainability assessments" 111 : 103719-, 2020

      29 Griffith, D. A., "Social exchange in supply chain relationships : the resulting benefits of procedural and distributive justice" 24 (24): 85-98, 2006

      30 Adler, P. S., "Social capital : prospects for a new concept" 27 (27): 17-40, 2002

      31 Frémont, A., "Shipping lines and logistics" 29 (29): 537-554, 2009

      32 Zsidisin, G. A., "Shipper-carrier relationships and their effect on carrier performance" 46 (46): 5-18, 2007

      33 UNCTAD, "Review of maritime transport, 2016 (UNCTAD/RMT/2016)" United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 2016

      34 Hillman, A. J., "Resource dependence theory : a review" 35 (35): 1404-1427, 2009

      35 Nyaga, G. N., "Relationship quality and performance outcomes : achieving a sustainable competitive advantage" 32 (32): 345-360, 2011

      36 Golicic, S. L., "Relationship magnitude and its role in interorganizational relationship structure" 24 (24): 57-75, 2003

      37 Nunkoo, R., "Power, trust, social exchange and community support" 39 (39): 997-1023, 2012

      38 Ulrich, D., "Perspectives in organisations : resource dependence, efficiency, and population" 9 (9): 471-481, 1984

      39 Williamson, O. E., "Outsourcing : Transaction cost economics and supply chain management" 44 (44): 5-16, 2008

      40 Dwyer, F. R., "Output sector munificence effects on the internal political economy of marketing channels" 24 (24): 347-358, 1987

      41 Fugate, B. S., "Operational collaboration between shippers and carriers in the transportation industry" 20 (20): 425-447, 2009

      42 Windeck, V., "Network optimization" Springer 574-576, 2011

      43 Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis" Pearson 2014

      44 Seo, Y. J., "Measures of supply chain collaboration in container logistics" 17 (17): 292-314, 2015

      45 Pedhazur, E. J., "Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach" Psycholoy Press 2013

      46 Talley, W. K., "Maritime transport chain choice by carriers, ports and shippers" 142 (142): 311-316, 2013

      47 Comtois, C., "Maritime logistics: A complete guide to effective shipping and port management" Kogan Page Ltd 163-176, 2012

      48 Midoro, R., "Maritime liner shipping and the stevedoring industry : Market structure and competition strategies" 32 (32): 89-106, 2005

      49 Stopford, M., "Maritime economics" Routledge 2009

      50 Geyskens, I., "Make, buy, or ally : a transaction cost theory meta-analysis" 49 (49): 519-543, 2006

      51 Maloni, M. J., "Linking ocean container carrier capabilities to shipper–carrier relationships : a case study" 43 (43): 959-975, 2016

      52 Song, D. W., "Learning from Hanjin Shipping’s failure : A holistic interpretation on its causes and reasons" 82 : 77-87, 2019

      53 Daugherty, P. J., "Is collaboration paying off for firms?" 49 (49): 61-70, 2006

      54 Bensaou, M., "Interorganizational cooperation : the role of information tech"nology an empirical comparison of US and Japanese supplier relations" 8 (8): 107-124, 1997

      55 Kent, J. L., "International containership carrier selection criteria : shippers/carriers differences" 29 (29): 398-408, 1999

      56 MOF, "Internal data"

      57 Kim, K. K., "Inter-organizational cooperation in buyer–supplier relationships : both perspectives" 63 (63): 863-869, 2010

      58 Kim, C. S., "Inter-firm cooperation and collaboration in shipper—shipping company relationships for enhancing sustainability" 10 (10): 3714-, 2018

      59 Notteboom, T., "Integrating Seaports and Trade Corridors" Ashgate Publishing Ltd 31-46, 2008

      60 Heaver, T. D., "Increased collaborative relationships in international logistics : Canadian and other national and corporate examples" 42 (42): 278-292, 2015

      61 OECD, "Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guided" Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2008

      62 Barney, J., "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage" 17 (17): 99-120, 1991

      63 Hudnurkar, M., "Factors affecting collaboration in supply chain : a literature review" 133 : 189-202, 2014

      64 Hornibrook, S., "Exploring the association between fairness and organisational outcomes in supply chain relationships" 37 : 790-803, 2009

      65 Richey, R. G., "Exploring a governance theory of supply chain management : Barriers and facilitators to integration" 31 (31): 237-256, 2010

      66 Willis, H. H., "Evaluating the security of the global containerized supply chain" RAND CorporationTR 214-, 2004

      67 Armstrong, J. S., "Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys" 14 (14): 396-402, 1977

      68 Branch, A. E., "Elements of shipping" Routledge 2007

      69 Kim, C. S., "Developing measurement scales of colla"boration in shipping logistics" 24 (24): 495-510, 2020

      70 Min, S., "Developing and measuring supply chain management concepts" 25 (25): 63-99, 2004

      71 Ganesan, S., "Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships" 58 (58): 1-19, 1994

      72 Vinh V. THAI ; Wei Jun TAY ; Raymond TAN ; Alan LAI, "Defining Service Quality in Tramp Shipping: Conceptual Model and Empirical Evidence" 한국해운물류학회 30 (30): 1-30, 2014

      73 Bove, L. L., "Customer relationships with service personnel: do we measure closeness, quality or strength?" 54 (54): 189-197, 2001

      74 Eyuboglu, N., "Current and future interdependence" 11 (11): 3-26, 2003

      75 Thomson, A. M., "Conceptualizing and measuring collaboration" 19 (19): 23-56, 2009

      76 Mohr, J., "Communication strategies in marketing channels : a theoretical perspective" 54 (54): 36-51, 1990

      77 Pradabwong, J., "Business process management and supply chain collaboration : effects on performance and com"petitiveness" 22 : 107-121, 2017

      78 Korsgaard, M. A., "Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams : the role of procedural justice" 38 (38): 60-84, 1995

      79 Costello, A. B., "Best practices in exploratory factor analysis : four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis" 10 (10): 1-9, 2005

      80 Kamal, B., "Application of fuzzy Bayesian approach on bankruptcy causes for container liner industry" 23 : 100769-, 2021

      81 Huo, B., "Antecedents and consequences of supply chain information integration : a resource-based view" 21 : 661-677, 2016

      82 Lin, S.M., "An exploration of relationship structures, their integration and value in maritime logistics networks" Cardiff University 2015

      83 Spekman, R. E., "An empirical investigation into supply chain management : A perspective on partnerships" 28 : 630-650, 1998

      84 Kamal, B., "An application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to overcapacity absorbing methods in container shipping" 162 (162): 331-344, 2021

      85 Malhotra, A., "Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains : Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation" 29 : 145-187, 2005

      86 Anderson, J. C., "A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships" 54 (54): 42-58, 1990

      87 Aydin, M., "A fuzzy Bayesian approach on bankruptcy of Hanjin Shipping" 2021

      88 Harland, C., "A conceptual model for researching the creation and operation of supply networks" 15 (15): 1-21, 2004

      89 Golicic, S. L., "A comparison of shipper and carrier relationship strength" 37 (37): 719-739, 2007

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼