탐험과 활용, 어떻게 통합할 것인가? = How to Integrate Exploration and Exploitation? Catalytic Roles of Leader as an Integration Mechanism

국문 초록 (Abstract)

탐험과 활용을 통한 조직의 역동적 역량을 구현하기 위한 방법들이 제시되고 있지만 이들을 어떻게 효과적으로 통합할 것인가에 대한 의문은 여전히 남아 있다. 탐험은 원심력과 같은 것으로 조직을 불안정하게 만들고 활용은 구심력과 같아 조직의 안정을 우선시 하는 속성을 가지고 있어 이들을 조직 내에서 통합하는 것이 쉽지 않기 때문이다. 본 연구는 이 문제에 관심을 갖으면서 탐험과 활용의 통합에 있어 중요한 한 열쇠를 리더에서 찾으려고 한다. 역동적 역량을 조직이 확보하기 위해 리더의 촉매적 통합활동이 중요하다는 논거 아래 한국의 대표적 기업을 중심으로 사례연구를 수행하였다. 사례연구를 통하여 리더의 통합을 위한 촉매역할이 추출되었다. 먼저 탐험과 활용의 통합을 촉진하기 위한 ‘장의 설정’이 제시되었다. 다음으로 리더의 관심과 몰입을 통한 ‘암묵적 압력의 조성’과 리더의 ‘경계경험 확장’ 역할이 리더의 핵심적 촉매역할로 제시되었다. 마지막으로 리더의 ‘후원’이 중요함이 제시되었다. 연구의 의미와 한계가 연구 말미에서 논의되었다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

While ways of promoting dynamic capability by using the concept of exploration and exploitation have been extensively researched, the body of organizational literature still lacks discussion of how to integrate these two conflicting activities. Exploration activities have many benefits but can make an organization unstable while exploitation enhances stability but at the expense of innovation. It is not easy to integrate the two different foci into an organization. The current study concerns the catalytic role of leaders in providing the key mechanisms for integrating exploration and exploitation. A case study was performed for the study on the LG Home Appliance Company, one of the divisions of LG Electronics. LG Home Appliance has been known as an innovativehome appliance company with strong worldwide market share.
The case study revealed four propositions regarding a leader’s key catalytic role for the integration of exploration and exploitation:
Proposition 1. Provide opportunities for confrontation between exploration and exploitation champions by setting a field of encounter
Proposition 2. Construct implicit pressures for integration by demonstrating attention and commitment
Proposition 3. Extend members’ boundary experiences by brokering problems, knowledge and context sharing
Proposition 4. Provide sponsorship by supporting members and removing barriers
The four mechanisms interact as follows:
<그림참고>
This study has strong practical implicationsin that it dealt with the mechanisms of explorationexploitation integration in a real organization, LG HAC. Therefore, the propositions derived in this study could likely be applied to organizations that are interested issues of exploration and exploitation integration. This study also has limitations, including the exclusive focus on the role of leaders. Therefore, further research is called for that explores the mechanisms for integration of exploration and exploitation organization-wide, for instance from an organizational structure or human resource management systems perspective.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• <초록>
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 역동적 역량 구축의 핵심: 탐험과 활용 및 이의 통합
• Ⅲ. 탐험과 활용의 통합을 위한 한 메커니즘: 리더의 촉매역할
• Ⅳ. 사례기업의 소개와 연구방법
• Ⅴ. 탐험과 할용의 통합과 리더의 촉매역할: 명제설정
• Ⅵ. 종합과 연구의 의미 및 한계에 대한 토의
• 참고문헌
• ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이홍, "지식점프" 삼성경제연구소 2004

2 이홍, "양면성(Ambidexterity)을 통한 역동적 역량의 구현：역사적 조망과 이의 효과적 구축을 위한 핵심과제" 한국인사조직학회 17 (17): 95-124, 2009

3 이홍, "생태계 기반 프로젝트의 성공조건: 사례를 통한 탐험적 연구" 한국인사관리학회 36 (36): 163-187, 2012

4 OZ, E., "Why information system projects are abandoned : A leadership and communication theory and exploratory study" 41 (41): 66-78, 2000

5 Ethiraj, S. K., "Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software service industry" 26 (26): 22-45, 2005

6 De Dreu, C. K. W., "When too little or too much hurts : Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams" 32 : 83-107, 2006

7 Feldman, M. S., "Ways of knowing and inclusive management practices" 66 : 89-99, 2006

8 Verona, G., "Unbundling dynamic capabilities : an exploratory study of continuous product innovation, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(3) : 557-606" 12 (12): 557-606, 2003

9 Collins, J., "Turning goals into results : the power of catalytic mechanisms" 77 (77): 71-82, 1999

10 Young, R., "Top management support : Mantra or necessity?" 26 : 713-725, 2008

11 Hall, C. S., "Theories of Personality, 3e" John Wiley and Sons 1978

12 Child, J., "The social constitution of organizations and its implications for organizational learning, In Organizational Learning and Knowledge" Oxford University Press 2001

13 Ford, J. D., "The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations" 20 (20): 541-570, 1995

14 Chakrabarri, A. K., "The role of champion in product innovation" 17 (17): 58-62, 1974

15 Howell, J. M., "The right stuff : Identifying and development effective champions of innovation" 19 (19): 108-119, 2005

16 Schneider, B., "The psychological life of organizations, In Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate" Sage xvii-xxii, 2000

17 Jehn, K. A., "The dynamic nature of conflict : A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance" 44 : 238-251, 2001

18 Teece, D. J., "The dynamic capabilities of firms : An introduction" 3 : 537-556, 1994

19 Tjosvold, D., "The conflict-positive organization : It depends on us" 29 : 19-28, 2008

20 Klein, K. J., "The challenge of innovation implementation" 21 (21): 1055-1079, 1996

21 Hyvari, I., "Success of project in different organizational conditions" 37 (37): 31-41, 2006

22 Bourgeon, L., "Staffing approach and conditions for collective learning in project team : The case of new product development projects" 25 : 413-422, 2007

23 Day, D. L., "Rasing radicals : Different processes for championing innovative corporate venture" 5 (5): 148-172, 1994

24 Bryde, D., "Perceptions of the impact of project sponsorship practices on project success" 26 : 800-809, 2008

25 Gelfand, M. J., "On the etiology of conflict cultures" 28 : 137-166, 2008

26 Lovelace, K., "Maximizing cross-functional new product team’s innovativeness and constraint adherence : a conflict communications perspective" 44 (44): 779-793, 2001

27 Smith, W. K., "Managing strategic contradictions : A to management model for managing innovation stream" 16 (16): 522-562, 2005

28 Lee, H., "Knowledge Jump" SERI 2004

29 Kahn, M. A., "Impact of task conflict on employees’ performance in financial institutions" 27 : 479-487, 2009

30 Ives, M., "Identifying the contextual element of project management within organizations and their impact on project success" 36 (36): 37-50, 2005

31 Julian, J., "How project management office leaders facilitate cross-project learning and continuous improvement" 39 (39): 43-58, 2008

32 Jenssen, J., "How do corporate champions promote innovations?" 8 (8): 63-86, 2004

33 Jansen, K., "From persistence to pursuit : A longitudinal examination of momentum during the early stags of strategic change" 15 (15): 276-294, 2004

34 Lewin, K., "Field Theory in Social Science" Harper and Brothers 1951

35 March, J. G., "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning" 2 (2): 71-87, 1991

36 Teece, D. J., "Dynamic capability and strategic management" 18 (18): 509-533, 1997

37 Eisenhardt, K. M., "Dynamic capabilities : What are they?" 21 : 1105-1121, 2000

38 Leonard-Barton, D., "Devleoper-user interaction and user satisfaction in internal technology transfer" 36 (36): 1125-1139, 1993

39 Zollo, M., "Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities" 13 (13): 339-351, 2002

40 Kim, L. S., "Crisis construction and organizational learning : capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor" 9 (9): 506-522, 1998

41 Jaffee, D., "Conflict at work throughout the history of organizations, In The Psychology of Conflict and Conflict Management in Organizations" Lawrence Erlbaum 55-80, 2008

42 Birkinshaw, J., "Building ambidexterity into an organization" 45 (45): 47-55, 2004

43 Belassi, W., "A new framework for determining critical success/ failure factors in projects" 14 (14): 141-151, 1996