RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한-중 FTA 문화서비스 분야 합의사항 및 후속 협상 방안 연구 -엔터테인먼트 산업을 중심으로- = Matters Agreed Upon in the Field of Cultural Services under the Korea-China FTA and Strategies for Subsequent Negotiations -Focusing on the Entertainment Industry-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102001366

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Korean government needs to do its utmost to maximize the effects of the subsequent negotiations on services of the Korea-China FTA, which will be commenced in two years. In order to lead China to open its market in a comprehensive way, it is first necessary to clearly understand the contents and problems of the past negotiations on services of the said FTA. For example, the scope of China’s liberalization in entertainment services is very narrow and similar sectors were not liberalized, hence little effect of a comprehensive liberalization. Second, Korean entertainment companies in China need to expand their business into broader regions and diversify the mode of such expansion. Most performance management agencies are currently supplying services in Beijing only through Mode 3, but they need to give preferential consideration to supplying services through Mode 1. It should also be understood that China has different supportive policies by region depending on the types of cultural services industries. Although China opened its market for Mode 3 under the Korea-China FTA, its domestic regulations are still in place on the entry of foreigners into China’s entertainment services markets. Even though China opened some entertainment services sectors under the abovementioned FTA, further discussion is needed on China’s domestic laws and systems which may act as an obstacle. At the subsequent negotiations, it is considered that, particularly regarding entry into China through Mode 3, the Korean side can request for relaxation of procedures to enter the Chinese markets and improvement of transparency in the assessment and authorization system. Lastly, it is also needed to provide legal and institutional frameworks for stable entry into China of Korean entertainers by linking Mode 3 and Mode 4. Without ensuring free entry into China of Korean entertainers, which is a fundamental part of Korea’s entertainment industry, the inherent limitations in such entry cannot be overcome. Therefore, a protocol on cultural cooperation should be adopted as part of the Korea-China FTA, like the Korea-EU FTA, to supplement the defects in entry into China through Mode 4. China has been very reluctant to open its services markets so far, but the nation is now recognizing the importance of promoting development of trade in services for continued economic growth and opening its markets. Since 2005, China has adopted a series of measures to accelerate development of services industries acknowledging the potential of services sectors to contribute to enhancing the nation’s competitiveness. Therefore, services negotiations with China will not be conducted in a favorable way only to Korea. In addition, the Korean side should also keep in mind during the negotiations that Korea will have to compete with Hong Kong and Taiwan in the Chinese entertainment services markets.
      번역하기

      The Korean government needs to do its utmost to maximize the effects of the subsequent negotiations on services of the Korea-China FTA, which will be commenced in two years. In order to lead China to open its market in a comprehensive way, it is first...

      The Korean government needs to do its utmost to maximize the effects of the subsequent negotiations on services of the Korea-China FTA, which will be commenced in two years. In order to lead China to open its market in a comprehensive way, it is first necessary to clearly understand the contents and problems of the past negotiations on services of the said FTA. For example, the scope of China’s liberalization in entertainment services is very narrow and similar sectors were not liberalized, hence little effect of a comprehensive liberalization. Second, Korean entertainment companies in China need to expand their business into broader regions and diversify the mode of such expansion. Most performance management agencies are currently supplying services in Beijing only through Mode 3, but they need to give preferential consideration to supplying services through Mode 1. It should also be understood that China has different supportive policies by region depending on the types of cultural services industries. Although China opened its market for Mode 3 under the Korea-China FTA, its domestic regulations are still in place on the entry of foreigners into China’s entertainment services markets. Even though China opened some entertainment services sectors under the abovementioned FTA, further discussion is needed on China’s domestic laws and systems which may act as an obstacle. At the subsequent negotiations, it is considered that, particularly regarding entry into China through Mode 3, the Korean side can request for relaxation of procedures to enter the Chinese markets and improvement of transparency in the assessment and authorization system. Lastly, it is also needed to provide legal and institutional frameworks for stable entry into China of Korean entertainers by linking Mode 3 and Mode 4. Without ensuring free entry into China of Korean entertainers, which is a fundamental part of Korea’s entertainment industry, the inherent limitations in such entry cannot be overcome. Therefore, a protocol on cultural cooperation should be adopted as part of the Korea-China FTA, like the Korea-EU FTA, to supplement the defects in entry into China through Mode 4. China has been very reluctant to open its services markets so far, but the nation is now recognizing the importance of promoting development of trade in services for continued economic growth and opening its markets. Since 2005, China has adopted a series of measures to accelerate development of services industries acknowledging the potential of services sectors to contribute to enhancing the nation’s competitiveness. Therefore, services negotiations with China will not be conducted in a favorable way only to Korea. In addition, the Korean side should also keep in mind during the negotiations that Korea will have to compete with Hong Kong and Taiwan in the Chinese entertainment services markets.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼