RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Learner Perceptions and Preferences of Device Type in Vocabulary Learning = Learner Perceptions and Preferences of Device Type in Vocabulary Learning

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100126427

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The present study investigated learner perceptions and preferences of device type in a technology-assisted vocabulary learning context. Forty-five university students were asked to complete online vocabulary learning exercises outside their classroom ...

      The present study investigated learner perceptions and preferences of device type in a technology-assisted vocabulary learning context. Forty-five university students were asked to complete online vocabulary learning exercises outside their classroom for 10 weeks. Then they completed a survey regarding the device they most often used, disadvantages of a particular device, distractions they experienced, their perceived mental focus, and locations where they completed the exercises. Results showed that half of the participants used PCs and half used smart phones. Those who often used PCs preferred a bigger screen and more comfortable use. Those who often used smartphones preferred a portable device for learning. About 56%of the participants indicated that lack of portability was the most significant disadvantage of PCs. About44% suggested that the biggest disadvantage of smart phones was a small screen size. Regarding distractionand mental focus, around 35% reported that PCs better facilitated focus, whereas about 15% indicated that smartphones were better facilitators, and about 50% said there was no significant difference. PC users reported more types of distractions, whereas smartphone users reported fewer types of distractions but each with more frequency. Regarding preferred locations, PC users preferred personal rooms, whereas most smart phone users did exercises while commuting.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼