RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE SCOPUS

      Feasibility and safety of fertility sparing surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer with dense adhesion: a long term result from a single institution

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107118051

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective: We investigated the feasibility and safety of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) inpatients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with dense adhesions. Methods: Patients were divided into cases with and without dense adhesions in thisretrospec...

      Objective: We investigated the feasibility and safety of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) inpatients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with dense adhesions.
      Methods: Patients were divided into cases with and without dense adhesions in thisretrospective study.
      Results: Of the 95 eligible patients, 29 patients had dense adhesions. Mean age, proportionof staging procedure, distribution of histologic type, and co-presence of endometriosis weredifferent (p=0.003, 0.033, 0.011, and 0.011, respectively). The median follow-up period was57.8 (0.4–230.0) months. There were no differences in the rates of recurrence (21.2% vs.
      20.7%, p=1.000) or death (16.7% vs. 6.9%, p=0.332) between the 2 groups. There was nodifference in the pattern of recurrence or in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival(OS) between the 2 groups. In multivariate analysis, pretreatment cancer antigen-125 >35U/mL and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IC were significantfactors of worse DFS and OS, while dense adhesion was not a prognostic factor for both DFS(hazard ratio [HR]=0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.3–2.7; p=0.792) and OS (HR=0.2;95% CI=0.1–1.8; p=0.142), nor were age, proportion of staging procedure, histologic type, andco-presence of endometriosis. Moreover, the distribution of those 2 significant prognosticfactors was not different between the 2 groups. Dense adhesions were subgrouped into non tumor and tumor associated dense adhesions for further analysis and the results were same.
      Conclusion: FSS is feasible and safe in EOC, regardless of the presence of dense adhesions.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Seidman JD, "Upstaging pathologic stage I ovarian carcinoma based on dense adhesions is not warranted : a clinicopathologic study of 84 patients originally classified as FIGO stage II" 119 : 250-254, 2010

      2 백이선, "Survival analysis of revised 2013 FIGO staging classification of epithelial ovarian cancer and comparison with previous FIGO staging classification" 대한산부인과학회 58 (58): 124-134, 2015

      3 Prat J, "Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum" 124 : 1-5, 2014

      4 Kajiyama H, "Recurrence-predicting prognostic factors for patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing fertility-sparing surgery : a multi-institutional study" 175 : 97-102, 2014

      5 Tropé C, "Randomized study on adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I high-risk ovarian cancer with evaluation of DNA-ploidy as prognostic instrument" 11 : 281-288, 2000

      6 Vergote I, "Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma" 357 : 176-182, 2001

      7 Dembo AJ, "Prognostic factors in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer" 75 : 263-273, 1990

      8 Plaxe SC, "Profiles of women age 30-39 and age less than 30 with epithelial ovarian cancer" 81 : 651-654, 1993

      9 Ozols RF, "Principles and practice of gynecologic oncology" Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins 927-, 2003

      10 정규원, "Prediction of Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Korea, 2015" 대한암학회 47 (47): 142-148, 2015

      1 Seidman JD, "Upstaging pathologic stage I ovarian carcinoma based on dense adhesions is not warranted : a clinicopathologic study of 84 patients originally classified as FIGO stage II" 119 : 250-254, 2010

      2 백이선, "Survival analysis of revised 2013 FIGO staging classification of epithelial ovarian cancer and comparison with previous FIGO staging classification" 대한산부인과학회 58 (58): 124-134, 2015

      3 Prat J, "Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum" 124 : 1-5, 2014

      4 Kajiyama H, "Recurrence-predicting prognostic factors for patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing fertility-sparing surgery : a multi-institutional study" 175 : 97-102, 2014

      5 Tropé C, "Randomized study on adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I high-risk ovarian cancer with evaluation of DNA-ploidy as prognostic instrument" 11 : 281-288, 2000

      6 Vergote I, "Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma" 357 : 176-182, 2001

      7 Dembo AJ, "Prognostic factors in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer" 75 : 263-273, 1990

      8 Plaxe SC, "Profiles of women age 30-39 and age less than 30 with epithelial ovarian cancer" 81 : 651-654, 1993

      9 Ozols RF, "Principles and practice of gynecologic oncology" Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins 927-, 2003

      10 정규원, "Prediction of Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Korea, 2015" 대한암학회 47 (47): 142-148, 2015

      11 Satoh T, "Outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for stage I epithelial ovarian cancer : a proposal for patient selection" 28 : 1727-1732, 2010

      12 Park JY, "Outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer : oncologic safety and reproductive outcomes" 110 : 345-353, 2008

      13 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, "Management of adnexal masses" 110 : 201-214, 2007

      14 Schlaerth AC, "Long-term survival after fertility-sparing surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer" 19 : 1199-1204, 2009

      15 Cho YH, "Is complete surgical staging necessary in patients with stage I mucinous epithelial ovarian tumors?" 103 : 878-882, 2006

      16 임명철, "Incidence of cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer in Korea, 1999-2010" 대한부인종양학회 24 (24): 298-302, 2013

      17 Kajiyama H, "Fertility-sparing surgery in young women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer" 36 : 404-408, 2010

      18 Antonino Ditto, "Fertility sparing surgery in early stage epithelial ovarian cancer" 대한부인종양학회 25 (25): 320-327, 2014

      19 "FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer" 83 (83): ix-xxii, 2003

      20 Aebi S, "Epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up" 19 (19): ii14-16, 2008

      21 Zapardiel I, "Conservative treatment of early stage ovarian cancer : oncological and fertility outcomes" 40 : 387-393, 2014

      22 Morice P, "Conservative treatment in epithelial ovarian cancer : results of a multicentre study of the GCCLCC(Groupe des Chirurgiens de Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer)and SFOG(Société Francaise d'Oncologie Gynécologique)" 20 : 1379-1385, 2005

      23 Raspagliesi F, "Conservative surgery in high-risk epithelial ovarian carcinoma" 185 : 457-460, 1997

      24 Zanetta G, "Conservative surgery for stage I ovarian carcinoma in women of childbearing age" 104 : 1030-1035, 1997

      25 Fruscio R, "Conservative management of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer : results of a large retrospective series" 24 : 138-144, 2013

      26 Heintz AP, "Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 26th annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer" 95 (95): S161-192, 2006

      27 Greenlee RT, "Cancer statistics, 2001" 51 : 15-36, 2001

      28 정규원, "Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2012" 대한암학회 47 (47): 127-141, 2015

      29 Vergote IB, "Analysis of prognostic factors in stage I epithelial ovarian carcinoma : importance of degree of differentiation and deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy in predicting relapse" 169 : 40-52, 1993

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2012-07-13 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한부인종양콜포스코피학회 -> 대한부인종양학회
      영문명 : Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy -> Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
      KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-06-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : 부인종양 -> Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
      외국어명 : Korean Journal of Gynecologic Oncology -> Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
      KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-09-13 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한부인종양.콜포스코피학회지 -> 부인종양
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.18 0.12 1.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.13 0.9 0.732 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼