Response modification factor of suspended zipper braced frames

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The suspended zipper bracing system is suggested to reduce the flaws of ordinary zipper braced and concentric inverted V braced frames. In the design procedure of suspended zipper bracing systems, columns and top story truss elements are strengthened. This bracing system show different performances and characteristics compared with inverted V braced and ordinary zipper frames. As a result, a different response modification factor for suspend zipper frames is needed. In this research paper, the response modification factor of suspended zipper frames was obtained using the incremental dynamic analysis. Suspended zipper braced frames with different stories and bay lengths were selected to be representations of the design space. To analyze the frames, a number of models were constructed and calibrated using experimental data. These archetype models were subjected to 44 earthquake records of the FEMA-P695 project data set. The incremental dynamic analysis and elastic dynamic analysis were carried out to determine the yield base shear value and elastic base shear value of archetype models using the OpenSEES software. The seismic response modification factor for each frame was calculated separately and the values of 9.5 and 13.6 were recommended for ultimate limit state and allowable stress design methods, respectively.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Uriz, P., "Toward earthquake-resistant design of concentrically braced steel-frame structures" University of California at Berkeley 2005

2 Mazzolani, F.M., "Theory and Design of Seismic Resistant Steel Frames" E & FN Spon 1996

3 Han, S. W., "Tensile strength equation for HSS bracing members having slotted end connections" 36 (36): 995-1008, 2007

4 "Structural response modification factors"

5 Goel, S. C., "Stability and Ductility of Steel Structures under Cyclic Loading" CRC Press 1992

6 Yang, C.S., "Special inverted V braced frames with suspended zipper struts" Georgia Institute of Technology 2003

7 Leon, T.R., "Special inverted V braced frames with suspended zipper struts" 2003

8 Uriz, P., "Seismic vulnerability assessment of concentically braced frames" 4 : 239-248, 2004

9 Khatib, I. F., "Seismic behavior of concentrically braced steel frames" Earthquake Engineering Research Center 1988

10 "Seismic Rehabilitation Pre-Standard"

11 American Institute of Steel Construction, "Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings" American Institute of Steel Construction 2005

12 Schmidt, B.J., "Review of resistance factor for steel: Resistance distributions and resistance factor calibration" 29 (29): 109-118, 2002

13 Jianguo Cai, "Response modification factor of dual moment-resistant frame with buckling restrained brace (BRB)" 국제구조공학회 14 (14): 621-636, 2013

14 "Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors"

15 Mozzoni, S., "OpenSEES command language manual"

16 American Society of Civil Engineers, "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures"

17 Uang, C. M., "Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd factor for building seismic provision" 117 (117): 19-28, 1991

18 Bruneau, M., "Ductile Design of Steel Structures" McGraw-Hill 1998

19 Kim, J., "Design of zipper column in inverted V braced steel frames" 2008

20 Kim, J., "Design of zipper column in inverted V braced steel frames" 2008

21 Yang, C., "Cyclic behavior of zipper-braced frames" 26 (26): 561-582, 2010

22 Mwafi, A.M., "Calibration of force reduction factors of RC buildings" 6 (6): 239-273, 2002

23 Fell, B. V., "Buckling and Fracture of Concentic Braces Under Inelastic Cyclic Loading"

24 Tremblay, R., "Behavior and design of multi-story zipper concentrically braced steel frames for the mitigation of soft-story response" 2003

25 Asgarian, B., "BRBF response modification factor" 65 (65): 290-298, 2008

26 "A critical review of current approaches to earthquake resistant design"