This paper appraises Quentin Skinner’s approach to political thought as a social science, arguing it is like the positivism of Karl Popper yet also like a research programme with a “hard core” and auxiliary hypothesis following Imre Lakatos. The...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100228989
2014
English
KCI등재
학술저널
123-148(26쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This paper appraises Quentin Skinner’s approach to political thought as a social science, arguing it is like the positivism of Karl Popper yet also like a research programme with a “hard core” and auxiliary hypothesis following Imre Lakatos. The...
This paper appraises Quentin Skinner’s approach to political thought as a social science, arguing it is like the positivism of Karl Popper yet also like a research programme with a “hard core” and auxiliary hypothesis following Imre Lakatos. These contentions are made by considering Skinner’s theory of speech acts, his belief in the objectivity of contextual evidence, and his vulnerable theory of rational intentions and action. Speech act theory delimits but does not logically necessitate the further theories of Skinner’s contextualism. The detachability of his auxiliary hypotheses allows the research programme to survive powerful criticisms of methodology in intellectual history and allows scholars to adapt theory from other social sciences, deepening and broadening the programme’s explanatory power.
목차 (Table of Contents)