RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      전족과 후족의 경도 조절된 인솔 착용에 따른 보행 시 지면반력과 장시간 착화감의 변화 = The Changes in Ground Reaction Force and the Long-term Comfort during Walking by Wearing Modified Hardness of the Insole in the Areas of Fore-foot and Rear-foot

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107292705

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in ground reaction force and long term comfort by wearing hardness modified insole on the areas of fore-foot and rear-foot during walking.
      Background: Proper adjustment of hardness of the insole based on the function of the foot during walking would be beneficial for reducing the magnitude of the impact and improving comfort perception. Furthermore, investigating the effect of hardness modified insole on the levels of comfort during long-term comfort test may be necessary for further application.
      Method: Seventeen healthy male adults (age: 22.9±1.8 years, body weight: 73.1± 8.0kg, height: 174.9±3.7cm) participated in the walking experiment and five healthy male adults from walking test (age: 29.4±5.2 years, body weight: 79.0±6.7kg, height: 175.2±1.8cm) participated in the long-term comfort test. Four insole conditions (hard hardness insole, [HI], medium hardness insole, [MI], low hardness insole, [LI], and basic insole, [BI]) in a 270mm walking shoe were applied to conduct the test. The data was collected during walking at a speed of 1.3m/s and 1.7m/s on an instrumented treadmill (Bertec, USA). Ground reaction force variables were the vertical impulse (VIM), vertical impact force (VIF), peak vertical ground reaction force (PVGRF), vertical loading rate (VLR), braking impulse (BIM), and propulsion impulse (PIM). Comfort variables were the width, cushioning, comfort, and foreignness.
      Results: The VIM and PVGRF were greater for the hardness modified insole (HI, MI & LI) compared with the BI during walking of 1.7m/s (p<.05). The VIF and VLR were statistically smaller for the hardness modified insole (HI, MI & LI) compared with the BI during walking of 1.3m/s and 1.7m/s (p<.05). The PIM was greater for the hardness modified insole (HI, MI & LI) compared with the BI during walking of 1.3m/s and 1.7m/s (p<.05). The overall cushioning was statistically greater for the hardness modified insole (MI & LI) compared with the BI.
      Conclusion: It was concluded that the hardness modified insole (HI, MI & LI) on the area of fore-foot and rear-foot may be more effective in the impact absorption and the propulsion compared with the BI during walking.
      Application: It is necessary to apply modified hardness of the insole to various sports movements. Future study would be warrant to consider different hardness and height in the area of arch support for a better stability and the comfort of lower extremities.
      번역하기

      Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in ground reaction force and long term comfort by wearing hardness modified insole on the areas of fore-foot and rear-foot during walking. Background: Proper adjustment of hardness of the...

      Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in ground reaction force and long term comfort by wearing hardness modified insole on the areas of fore-foot and rear-foot during walking.
      Background: Proper adjustment of hardness of the insole based on the function of the foot during walking would be beneficial for reducing the magnitude of the impact and improving comfort perception. Furthermore, investigating the effect of hardness modified insole on the levels of comfort during long-term comfort test may be necessary for further application.
      Method: Seventeen healthy male adults (age: 22.9±1.8 years, body weight: 73.1± 8.0kg, height: 174.9±3.7cm) participated in the walking experiment and five healthy male adults from walking test (age: 29.4±5.2 years, body weight: 79.0±6.7kg, height: 175.2±1.8cm) participated in the long-term comfort test. Four insole conditions (hard hardness insole, [HI], medium hardness insole, [MI], low hardness insole, [LI], and basic insole, [BI]) in a 270mm walking shoe were applied to conduct the test. The data was collected during walking at a speed of 1.3m/s and 1.7m/s on an instrumented treadmill (Bertec, USA). Ground reaction force variables were the vertical impulse (VIM), vertical impact force (VIF), peak vertical ground reaction force (PVGRF), vertical loading rate (VLR), braking impulse (BIM), and propulsion impulse (PIM). Comfort variables were the width, cushioning, comfort, and foreignness.
      Results: The VIM and PVGRF were greater for the hardness modified insole (HI, MI & LI) compared with the BI during walking of 1.7m/s (p<.05). The VIF and VLR were statistically smaller for the hardness modified insole (HI, MI & LI) compared with the BI during walking of 1.3m/s and 1.7m/s (p<.05). The PIM was greater for the hardness modified insole (HI, MI & LI) compared with the BI during walking of 1.3m/s and 1.7m/s (p<.05). The overall cushioning was statistically greater for the hardness modified insole (MI & LI) compared with the BI.
      Conclusion: It was concluded that the hardness modified insole (HI, MI & LI) on the area of fore-foot and rear-foot may be more effective in the impact absorption and the propulsion compared with the BI during walking.
      Application: It is necessary to apply modified hardness of the insole to various sports movements. Future study would be warrant to consider different hardness and height in the area of arch support for a better stability and the comfort of lower extremities.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 우정휘, "트레드밀 보행시 인솔 형태 변화에 따른 족저압력 분석" 한국운동역학회 25 (25): 113-122, 2015

      2 채원식, "탄소나노튜브 인솔 착용에 따른 드롭 착지 동작의 생체역학적 분석" 한국운동역학회 22 (22): 429-435, 2012

      3 유시현, "조립 형태 인솔의 경도 변화가 달리기의 충격 흡수 기능과 착화감에 미치는 영향" 대한인간공학회 39 (39): 539-548, 2020

      4 진영완, "인솔 차이에 따른 런닝화의 운동역학적 비교" 한국운동역학회 17 (17): 51-59, 2007

      5 정병열, "신발인솔 높이와 재질이 발의 압력과 운동 효과에 미치는 영향" 한국스포츠리서치 15 (15): 911-924, 2004

      6 은선덕, "신발 인솔의 재질이 무릎 골관절염 환자의 보행에 미치는 영향" 한국운동역학회 17 (17): 181-188, 2007

      7 이중숙, "보행시 보급형 키 높이 인솔의 높이와 재질이 평균 족저압에 미치는 영향" 한국운동역학회 21 (21): 479-486, 2011

      8 박승범, "보행 시 변형 및 복원이 가능한 인솔에 대한 족저압력 비교 분석" 한국운동역학회 21 (21): 231-241, 2011

      9 유시현, "발바닥 부위별 인솔 소재 및 경도 변화가 착화감과 충격 흡수에 미치는 영향" 대한인간공학회 37 (37): 475-487, 2018

      10 신성훈, "런닝화의 일반인솔과 기능성인솔의 운동역학적 비교 분석" 한국운동역학회 16 (16): 9-18, 2006

      1 우정휘, "트레드밀 보행시 인솔 형태 변화에 따른 족저압력 분석" 한국운동역학회 25 (25): 113-122, 2015

      2 채원식, "탄소나노튜브 인솔 착용에 따른 드롭 착지 동작의 생체역학적 분석" 한국운동역학회 22 (22): 429-435, 2012

      3 유시현, "조립 형태 인솔의 경도 변화가 달리기의 충격 흡수 기능과 착화감에 미치는 영향" 대한인간공학회 39 (39): 539-548, 2020

      4 진영완, "인솔 차이에 따른 런닝화의 운동역학적 비교" 한국운동역학회 17 (17): 51-59, 2007

      5 정병열, "신발인솔 높이와 재질이 발의 압력과 운동 효과에 미치는 영향" 한국스포츠리서치 15 (15): 911-924, 2004

      6 은선덕, "신발 인솔의 재질이 무릎 골관절염 환자의 보행에 미치는 영향" 한국운동역학회 17 (17): 181-188, 2007

      7 이중숙, "보행시 보급형 키 높이 인솔의 높이와 재질이 평균 족저압에 미치는 영향" 한국운동역학회 21 (21): 479-486, 2011

      8 박승범, "보행 시 변형 및 복원이 가능한 인솔에 대한 족저압력 비교 분석" 한국운동역학회 21 (21): 231-241, 2011

      9 유시현, "발바닥 부위별 인솔 소재 및 경도 변화가 착화감과 충격 흡수에 미치는 영향" 대한인간공학회 37 (37): 475-487, 2018

      10 신성훈, "런닝화의 일반인솔과 기능성인솔의 운동역학적 비교 분석" 한국운동역학회 16 (16): 9-18, 2006

      11 정재후, "드롭 착지 시 탄소나노튜브 소재의 인솔 착용이 하지의 합성 관절 모멘트 및 근활성도에 미치는 영향" 국민체육진흥공단 한국스포츠정책과학원 26 (26): 479-487, 2015

      12 박재영, "다기능성 인솔 착용 시 하지의 근활성도 분석" 한국운동역학회 20 (20): 327-336, 2010

      13 김의환, "기능성 인솔유형들의 생체역학적 평가" 한국운동역학회 20 (20): 345-353, 2010

      14 Mundermann, A., "Relationship between footwear comfort of shoe inserts and anthropometric and sensory factors" 33 (33): 1939-1945, 2001

      15 Garner, L. I., "Prevention of lower extremity stress fractures; A controlled trial of a shock absorbent insole" 78 : 1563-1567, 1988

      16 Bennell, K. L., "Lateral wedge insoles for medial knee osteoarthritis: 12 month randomised controlled trial" 342 : d2912-, 2011

      17 Chan, Z. Y. S., "Gait retraining for the reduction of injury occurrence in novice distance runners: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial" 46 (46): 388-395, 2018

      18 Lullini, G., "Functional evaluation of a shock absorbing insole during military training in a group of soldiers: a pilot study" 185 (185): e643-e648, 2020

      19 Collins, N., "Foot orthoses and physiotherapy in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome: randomised clinical trial" 43 : 163-168, 2009

      20 Hamill, J., "Experiment in Sport Biomechanics" Daehanmedia 2003

      21 Marshall, R. N., "Evaluation of lower extremity overuse injury potential in runners" 32 (32): 1635-1641, 2000

      22 Lam, W. K., "Effect of shoe wearing time and midsole hardness on ground reaction forces, ankle stability and perceived comfort in basketball landing" 37 (37): 2347-2355, 2019

      23 Snyder, R. A., "Does shoe insole modification prevent stress fractures? A systematic review" 5 : 92-98, 2009

      24 하성희, "Do the Mechanical Properties of Midsole Affect Body Shock and Stabilization for Lower Extremity During Running?" 대한인간공학회 39 (39): 99-108, 2020

      25 Mundermann, A., "Development of reliable method to assess footwear comfort during running" 16 : 38-45, 2002

      26 Mundermann, A., "Consistent immediate effects of foot orthoses on comfort and lower extremity kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity" 20 : 71-84, 2004

      27 Penny, J. Ø., "Can an off-the-rack orthotic stiletto alter pressure and comfort scores in the forefoot, arch and heel?" 61 (61): 1130-1138, 2018

      28 Nigg, B. M, "Biomechanics of Sport Shoes" University of Calgary 2010

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.1 0.1 0.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.15 0.19 0.306 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼