RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCI SCIE SCOPUS

      Comparison of Costs of Endovascular Repair versus Open Surgical Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104792864

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study was designed to compare the hospital-related costs of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treatment and cost structure between endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) in Korean health care system. One hundred...

      This study was designed to compare the hospital-related costs of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treatment and cost structure between endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) in Korean health care system. One hundred five primary elective AAA repairs (79 OSRs and 26 EVARs) performed in the Seoul National University Hospital from 2005 to 2009 were included. Patient characteristics were similar between two groups except for older age (P = 0.004) and more frequent history of malignancy (P = 0.031) in EVAR group. Thirty-day mortality rate was similar between two groups and there was no AAA-related mortality in both groups for 5 yr after repair. The total in-hospital costs for the index admission were significantly higher in EVAR patients (mean, KRW19,857,119) than OSR patients (mean KRW12,395,507) (P < 0.001). The reimbursement was also significantly higher in EVAR patients than OSR patients (mean,KRW14,071,081 vs KRW6,238,895, P < 0.001) while patients payments was comparable between two groups. EVAR patients showed higher follow-up cost up to 2 yr due to more frequent imaging studies and reinterventions for type II endoleaks (15.4%). In the perspective of cost-effectiveness, this study suggests that the determination of which method to be used in AAA treatment be more finely trimmed and be individualized.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박양진, "국내 복부대동맥류 환자 치료의 실태 조사" 대한외과학회 80 (80): 125-130, 2011

      2 Patel ST, "The cost-effectiveness of endovascular repair versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a decision analysis model" 29 : 958-972, 1999

      3 Mani K, "Similar cost for elective open and endovascular AAA repair in a population-based setting" 15 : 1-11, 2008

      4 Berrington de González A, "Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries" 363 : 345-351, 2004

      5 Chaikof EL, "Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair" 35 : 1048-1060, 2002

      6 Lederle FA, "Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial" 302 : 1535-1542, 2009

      7 Conrad MF, "Long-term durability of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair" 46 : 669-675, 2007

      8 Dryjski M, "Hospital costs for endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm" 197 : 64-70, 2003

      9 Sternbergh WC, "Hospital cost of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multicenter study" 31 : 237-244, 2000

      10 Hallett JW Jr, "Graft-related complications after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: reassurance from a 36-year populationbased experience" 25 : 277-284, 1997

      1 박양진, "국내 복부대동맥류 환자 치료의 실태 조사" 대한외과학회 80 (80): 125-130, 2011

      2 Patel ST, "The cost-effectiveness of endovascular repair versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a decision analysis model" 29 : 958-972, 1999

      3 Mani K, "Similar cost for elective open and endovascular AAA repair in a population-based setting" 15 : 1-11, 2008

      4 Berrington de González A, "Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries" 363 : 345-351, 2004

      5 Chaikof EL, "Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair" 35 : 1048-1060, 2002

      6 Lederle FA, "Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial" 302 : 1535-1542, 2009

      7 Conrad MF, "Long-term durability of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair" 46 : 669-675, 2007

      8 Dryjski M, "Hospital costs for endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm" 197 : 64-70, 2003

      9 Sternbergh WC, "Hospital cost of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multicenter study" 31 : 237-244, 2000

      10 Hallett JW Jr, "Graft-related complications after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: reassurance from a 36-year populationbased experience" 25 : 277-284, 1997

      11 Hayter CL, "Follow- up costs increase the cost disparity between endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair" 42 : 912-918, 2005

      12 Quinoñes-Baldrich WJ, "Endovascular, transperitoneal, and retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: results and costs" 30 : 59-67, 1999

      13 Greenhalgh RM, "Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm" 362 : 1863-1871, 2010

      14 Parodi JC, "Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms and other arterial lesions" 3 : 431-436, 1994

      15 Kent KC, "Endovascular aneurysm repair: is it durable?" 362 : 1930-1931, 2010

      16 EVAR Trial Participants, "Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial" 365 : 2179-2186, 2005

      17 Hölzenbein J, "Endovascular AAA treatment: expensive prestige or economic alternative?" 14 : 265-272, 1997

      18 Michaels JA, "Cost-effectiveness of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair" 92 : 960-967, 2005

      19 Prinssen M, "Cost-effectiveness of conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: results of a randomized trial" 46 : 883-890, 2007

      20 Hayes PD, "Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular versus open surgical repair of acute abdominal aortic aneurysms based on worldwide experience" 17 : 174-182, 2010

      21 Tarride JE, "Cost-effectiveness analysis of elective endovascular repair compared with open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneu rysms for patients at a high surgical risk: a 1-year patient-level analysis conducted in Ontario, Canada" 48 : 779-787, 2008

      22 Walker KL, "Cost of thoracic endovascular aortic repair versus open repair and implications for the US health care system" 139 : 231-232, 2010

      23 Mani K, "Challenges in analysis and interpretation of cost data in vascular surgery" 51 : 148-154, 2010

      24 Clair DG, "An evaluation of the costs to health care institutions of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair" 32 : 148-152, 2000

      25 Visser JJ, "Acute abdominal aortic aneurysms: cost analysis of endovascular repair and open surgery in hemodynamically stable patients with 1-year follow-up" 240 : 681-689, 2006

      26 Prinssen M, "A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms" 351 : 1607-1618, 2004

      27 Hynes N, "A prospective clinical, economic, and quality-of-life analysis comparing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), open repair, and best medical treatment in high-risk patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms suitable for EVAR: the Irish patient trial" 14 : 763-776, 2007

      28 Blackhouse G, "A cost-effectiveness model comparing endovascular repair to open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in Canada" 12 : 245-252, 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 SCI 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.48 0.37 1.06
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.85 0.75 0.691 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼