RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      대학 영작문 수업에서 EBB 평가척도의 환류효과 = The Washback Effect of the EBB Rating Scale in Writing Courses

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105366133

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study investigated the washback effect of the EBB rating scale in writing classes. Specifically, this study explored college students’ perceptions of the EBB rating scale, in comparison with the holistic rating scale. The participants were college students taking the academic writing course and they completed the survey right after evaluating their essays using the holistics rating scale as well as the EBB rating scale. The survey results showed that a majority of students perceived the EBB rating scale useful in checking out the mastery of overall lesson objectives. It was also found that students had different perceptions of usefulness of the EBB rating scale according to different background information such as TOEIC scores and self-assessment of English proficiency. Students with TOEIC scores below 500 thought that using the EBB rating scale made them grasp the overall lesson objectives. Also, students who self-assessed their English proficiency low perceived that the EBB rating scale was useful in diagnosing their own writing weaknesses and comprehending criterial questions. The findings can provide practical implications of the EBB rating scale for writing courses, which also can serve as a valuable reference for course planners in similar contexts.
      번역하기

      This study investigated the washback effect of the EBB rating scale in writing classes. Specifically, this study explored college students’ perceptions of the EBB rating scale, in comparison with the holistic rating scale. The participants were coll...

      This study investigated the washback effect of the EBB rating scale in writing classes. Specifically, this study explored college students’ perceptions of the EBB rating scale, in comparison with the holistic rating scale. The participants were college students taking the academic writing course and they completed the survey right after evaluating their essays using the holistics rating scale as well as the EBB rating scale. The survey results showed that a majority of students perceived the EBB rating scale useful in checking out the mastery of overall lesson objectives. It was also found that students had different perceptions of usefulness of the EBB rating scale according to different background information such as TOEIC scores and self-assessment of English proficiency. Students with TOEIC scores below 500 thought that using the EBB rating scale made them grasp the overall lesson objectives. Also, students who self-assessed their English proficiency low perceived that the EBB rating scale was useful in diagnosing their own writing weaknesses and comprehending criterial questions. The findings can provide practical implications of the EBB rating scale for writing courses, which also can serve as a valuable reference for course planners in similar contexts.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 고원준, "작문 수업에 적용한 과업 기반 지도와 자기 평가에 관한 연구" 한국중등영어교육학회 1 (1): 3-32, 2008

      2 이영주, "영작문 시간에 활용된 자동 쓰기 평가 피드백에 대한 학생들의 인식 탐색" 한국중등영어교육학회 10 (10): 143-164, 2017

      3 이호, "귀납적 이분법 척도를 활용한 예비 영어교사의 영어말하기 평가 신뢰도와 효용성에 관한 연구" 한국교원교육학회 27 (27): 215-237, 2010

      4 Plakans, L., "Writing scale development and use within a language program" 4 (4): 151-163, 2013

      5 Upshur, J., "Systematic effects in the rating of second-language speaking ability : Test method and learner discourse" 16 : 82-111, 1999

      6 Turner, C., "Rating scales derived from student samples : Effects of the scale maker and the student sample on scale content and student scores" 36 : 49-70, 2002

      7 Turner, C., "Listening to the voices of rating scale developers" 56 (56): 555-584, 2000

      8 Fulcher, G., "Evaluating quality in second language performance tests" 1 : 3-19, 2007

      9 황성삼, "EBB를 이용한 중등학교 말하기 평가척도 개발" 한국영어교육학회 63 (63): 307-331, 2008

      10 Fulcher, G., "Does thick description lead to smart tests? A data-based approach to rating scale construction" 13 : 208-238, 1996

      1 고원준, "작문 수업에 적용한 과업 기반 지도와 자기 평가에 관한 연구" 한국중등영어교육학회 1 (1): 3-32, 2008

      2 이영주, "영작문 시간에 활용된 자동 쓰기 평가 피드백에 대한 학생들의 인식 탐색" 한국중등영어교육학회 10 (10): 143-164, 2017

      3 이호, "귀납적 이분법 척도를 활용한 예비 영어교사의 영어말하기 평가 신뢰도와 효용성에 관한 연구" 한국교원교육학회 27 (27): 215-237, 2010

      4 Plakans, L., "Writing scale development and use within a language program" 4 (4): 151-163, 2013

      5 Upshur, J., "Systematic effects in the rating of second-language speaking ability : Test method and learner discourse" 16 : 82-111, 1999

      6 Turner, C., "Rating scales derived from student samples : Effects of the scale maker and the student sample on scale content and student scores" 36 : 49-70, 2002

      7 Turner, C., "Listening to the voices of rating scale developers" 56 (56): 555-584, 2000

      8 Fulcher, G., "Evaluating quality in second language performance tests" 1 : 3-19, 2007

      9 황성삼, "EBB를 이용한 중등학교 말하기 평가척도 개발" 한국영어교육학회 63 (63): 307-331, 2008

      10 Fulcher, G., "Does thick description lead to smart tests? A data-based approach to rating scale construction" 13 : 208-238, 1996

      11 Turner, C., "Developing rating scales for the assessment of second language performance. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics" 13 : 55-79, 1996

      12 Upshur, J., "Constructing rating scales for second language tests" 49 : 3-12, 1995

      13 Weigle, S. C., "Assessing Writing. Cambridge" Cambridge University Press 2002

      14 송대연, "Applicability of an EBB Scale to English Speaking Performance Assessment in the Korean Secondary School" 팬코리아영어교육학회 21 (21): 111-135, 2009

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.58 0.58 0.61
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.58 0.53 1.014 0.29
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼