RISS 검색 - 국내학술지논문 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to explain and analyze contents and issues on diverse theories on the linkage between tourism and international development cooperation, arguments on donors’ national interests in tourism, and the relationship between tourism and SDGs.
Originality: Tourism industry is one of the most important industries in many developing countries to alleviate poverty, enhance gender equality, and promote general socioeconomic development, because of tourism industries’ characteristics of labor-intensiveness, possession of different tourism resources, low trade barriers, and lack of alternative development strategies. Nevertheless, it has been criticized that development cooperation in tourism and tourism ODA have not resulted in development of developing countries because of strong influence of multinational corporations, imports of tourism goods and services, dubious effectiveness of tourism ODA, and negative effects of tourism on development. Also, despite its practical importance for development, academic researches on tourism, development and tourism ODA are scarce. Accordingly, this study tries to reduce the gap between practical importance and academic underdevelopment in the issue of tourism and development.
Methodology: Two main methodologies applied in this study are comprehensive literature review and content analyses. This study reviewed diverse academic sources on tourism and development. Also, this study searched for relevant contents on the issue from government documents and official documents of OECD and UNWTO. Result: This study explains diverse theories on tourism and development. They include modernization theory, dependency theory, neoliberal globalization theory, and alternative development theory. This study also explains what national interests are pursued by donor countries in tourism development cooperation. This study explains important issues in the linkage between tourism and SDGs such as gender equality, poverty alleviation and employment, and sustainability.
Conclusions and Implication: There must be some international effort to reduce the gap between importance of tourism in developing countries and relative disinterest in tourism ODA in donor countries. Particularly, there must be more concerns about development and ODA giving in tourism sector to developing countries which are highly dependent on tourism and then face economic crisis from COVID 19 pandemic.

번역하기

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 신용석, "한국의 관광 ODA에 대한 탐색적 연구 -현황과 문제점, 그리고 개선과제를 중심으로-" 한국관광학회 38 (38): 271-289, 2014

2 주한나, "지속가능개발목표와 관광: 아세안관광표준 내용 분석을 통해 본 표준의 역할" 국제개발협력학회 10 (10): 161-198, 2018

3 박효연, "우리나라 관광 ODA 추진방향에 대한 연구:전문가 인식조사를 중심으로" (사)한국관광레저학회 28 (28): 25-40, 2016

4 김석우, "생존과 원조: 대만 해외원조 정책 연구" 21세기정치학회 28 (28): 189-209, 2018

5 김석우, "국제정치와 관광: 이론적 논의와 이슈" 사단법인 한국평화연구학회 20 (20): 33-52, 2019

6 Gulrajani, N., "Understanding donor motivations: Developing the Principled Aid Index" ODI 2019

7 Bramwell, B., "Towards innovation in sustainable tourism research?" 20 (20): 1-7, 2012

8 Lee, Gabriel P, "Tourism as a factor in development cooperation" 8 (8): 2-19, 1987

9 Jafari, J., "Tourism as a Factor of Change: A Sociocultural Study" Vienna Center 17-60, 1989

10 UNWTO, "Tourism and the Sustainable Development Goals" 2015