『동아시아사』 교과서의 「지역간 인구이동과 전쟁」 단원 서술에 대한 試論 -지역국가들의 戰略的 意志와 동아시아세계의 형성- = “Inter-Regional Population Shift and Wars”: Describing a chapter in the East Asian history textbook -Strategic Commitment of Countries and the Formation of the East Asian World-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Regarding a compilation of the East Asian history textbook, there is recognition that the East Asian world is one cultural area which shares many cultural elements and influences each other by constant negotiations throughout history. The ancient East Asian world was stimulated by the introduction of Chinese characters, Confucianism, law, Chinese Buddhism to Manchuria, Korean peninsula and Japanese archipelago. In this respect, the chapter of “Inter-Regional Population Shift and Wars” is very important in setting the East Asian history. This is because migration is regarded as a cause of both the spread of Chinese cultural elements to neighbouring countries and their regional acceptance.
However, it seems that the migration movement which set up by the East Asian history textbook is too specific to a particular case in mind. It is understood that Han Chinese migration caused the spread of Chinese cultural elements to other countries. As a consequence, it could be easily misunderstood that the formation of the East Asian world as the assimila- tion of Chinese culture over neighbouring countries, namely “Hanization.”I believe that sharing culture by population movement is important, but the other reasons why each local area accepted these cultural elements are more important in relation to the formation of the East Asian history. On these issues, this thesis examines that to what extent historical facts indeed support the argument above. I hope this work will be a good reference in writing history textbooks in future.
Installation of the Four Commanderies of Han provided Han Chinese a proper environment for collective migration. The migrants were mainly government officials, soldiers, and merchants who were related to political and military powers of the Four Commanderies of Han. It is clear to see that the immigration due to the installation of the Four Commanderies paved the way for the eastern region of Han to encounter the Chinese Civilisation. However, there was not a direct relationship between the immigration and the accommodation of Chinese culture in the region.
If the issue is more focused on the cultural exchange between Han and the neighbouring areas rather than the population influx, it is found that the Han Chinese culture was passed by the media of the Commandery’s people. Nakrang Society under the Four Commanderies of Han gradually accepted Han Chinese culture. At that moment, Confucius culture was flourished in Nakrang as even Nakrang people could normally recite Han poems. On the other hand, the neighbouring countries, which were stimulated by Han as a result of the contact with the Han Provinces, were aware of the need for the introduction and implementation of the Han Chinese culture. For example, it has been proved that Goguryeo secured the Commandery’s people by encroaching on the Four Commanderies, and then learnt Chinese Characters and adopted an element level of document administration.
On the other hand, the massive conflict in the period of Sixteen Kingdoms and of Southern and Northern Dynasties caused population movement in a grand scale. One of the massive migrants was the Han Chinese to Goguryeo across Liao River. The state of the Chinese migrants during this period shows that the immigrant flow even reached Goguryeo further across Liao River at the period of the sudden change in China. So, pro tanto, Goguryeo was closely linked with the international situation with China as a centre. However, Goguryeo achieved its development in its own way while keeping itself out of the political turmoil and the confrontation in China. It was a result of Goguryeo’s foreign policy which took an advantage of the Chinese immigrants. Also, Goguryeo mobilized the Chinese settlers in a management of former provinces such as Pyongyang. It was a golden age in the history of Goguryeo because the kingdom overcame its failures of king Gogukwon and furthermore, aligned its government organisation. In relati...

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 尹龍九, "樂浪前期 郡縣支配勢力의 種族系統과 性格" 126 : 1990

2 이성규, "한국 고대국가의 형성과 한자 수용" 한국고대사학회 32 : 55-94, 2003

3 권오중, "중국사에서의 낙랑군" 한국고대사학회 34 : 19-40, 2004

4 고구려연구재단, "중국 소재 고구려 관련 금석문 자료집"

5 이성규, "중국 군현으로서의 낙랑" 동북아역사재단 2006

6 이성제, "위진남북조의 ‘요동’인식과 고구려-조위의 동방경략과 그 역사적 의미를 중심으로- in 중국의 변강 인식과 갈등" 한신대출판부 2007

7 이공범, "위진남북조사" 지식산업사 2003

8 노태돈, "부체제의 성립과 구조" 사계절 1999

9 權五榮, "백제의 성립과 발전" 6 : 1995

10 동북아역사재단, "동아시아사 교육과정 해설서, 동아시아사 교과서 집필 안내서 부록, 동북아역사재단 편"

11 이성시, "동아시아 문화권의 형성 in 만들어진 고대" 삼인 2001

12 宋基豪, "고대의 문자생활-비교와 시기구분" 5 : 2002

13 윤용구, "고구려의 흥기와 幘溝漊 in 고구려의 역사와 대외관계" 서경문화사 2007

14 이성제, "고구려 장수왕의 대북위교섭과 그 정치적 의미 -북연을 둘러싸고 이루어진 대북위관계의 전개-" 역사학회 181 (181): 1-35, 2004

15 李成制, "高句麗와 北齊의 關係" 23 : 2001

16 林泉, "高句麗における佛敎受容と平壤-肖門ㆍ伊弗蘭寺の位置をめぐって" 96 : 1996

17 李成制, "高句麗 長壽王代의 對宋外交과 그 意義" 67 : 2003

18 金武重, "考古資料를 통해 본 百濟와 樂浪의 交涉" 호서고고학회 (11집) : 17-34, 2004

19 田中史生, "百濟王興寺と飛鳥寺と渡來人" 136 : 2008

20 李成市, "東アジアの諸國と人口移動 in アジアからみた古代日本" 角川書店 1992

21 坂元義, "推古朝の外交-とくに隋との關係を中心に" 100 : 1979

22 徐永大, "德興里古墳 墨書銘 in 譯註 韓國古代金石文" 한국고대사회연구소 1992

23 加藤謙吉, "古代史硏究の最前線(第1卷, 政治ㆍ經濟編 上)" 雄山閣 1986

24 田中史生, "倭國と渡來人-交錯する｢內｣と 外" 吉川弘文館 2005

25 李成制, "‘北魏末 流人’문제를 통하여 본 高句麗의 西方政策, In 高句麗의 西方政策 硏究" 國學資料院 2005

26 李成制, "570年代 高句麗의 對倭交涉과 그 意味-새로운 對外戰略의 추진 배경과 내용에 대한 재검토" 2 : 2009

27 林起煥, "4세기 고구려의 樂浪․帶方地域 경영" 147 : 1995

28 여호규, "4세기 高句麗의 樂浪․帶方 경영과 中國系 亡命人의 정체성 인식" 한국고대사학회 (53) : 159-200, 2009

29 李成制, "4∼5世紀 高句麗의 樂浪․帶方故地에 대한 統治와 平壤遷都" 西江大學校 1996