RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      안경테 재질에 대한 만족도 고찰

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104880901

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: We investigated the satisfaction of wearer about the material of glasses frame which is a tool of visual correction and a fashion item in order to use it as basic data in marketing and fitting. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted on the satisfaction of plastic and metal glasses frames for 20‘s and 30’s male and female students. Frequency analysis, X² test, and independent t-test were conducted. Results: Among the respondents, 32.7% showed the tendency to follow the fashion trend, and 12.5% showed the tendency not to follow the trend. The reasons for the replacement of glasses were eyesight change (33.6%), glasses’ damage (27.9%), old design (18.9%) and so on. The glasses’ material used currently is was 50.5% of metal and 25.7% of plastic, showing that metal frames were used more than plastic frames. The reasons for choosing such glasses frames were ‘suitable for face type’ (33.3%), fashion trend (29.7%) and so on. The satisfaction of the respondents was examined. In the case of plastic frames, users were satisfied with price (M = 3.52), weight (M = 3.37) and design (M = 3.36). Gliding (M = 2.91) was the lowest. On the other hand, in the case of metal frames, users were most satisfied with the design (M = 3.80) and satisfied with the order of comfort and weight. Deformation is the lowest satisfaction. For wearer satisfaction, fitting and adjusting according to material should be important. Women tend to follow more fashion and design trends than men (t = −2.989, p<.01). Those who prefer metal frame tends to be more susceptible to trends such as fashion and design than those who prefer plastic one (F = 8.556, P<.001). Conclusions: The satisfaction of the male wearer according to the frame material did not show much difference between the preference of metal frame and plastic frame. On the other hand, women prefer metal frames because they are sensitive to fashionable materials and designs. As the desire of consumers changes according to the fashion, the opticians should fit using the material characteristics so as to satisfy the satisfaction of the wearer, and consider the marketing related to the design.
      번역하기

      Purpose: We investigated the satisfaction of wearer about the material of glasses frame which is a tool of visual correction and a fashion item in order to use it as basic data in marketing and fitting. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted on...

      Purpose: We investigated the satisfaction of wearer about the material of glasses frame which is a tool of visual correction and a fashion item in order to use it as basic data in marketing and fitting. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted on the satisfaction of plastic and metal glasses frames for 20‘s and 30’s male and female students. Frequency analysis, X² test, and independent t-test were conducted. Results: Among the respondents, 32.7% showed the tendency to follow the fashion trend, and 12.5% showed the tendency not to follow the trend. The reasons for the replacement of glasses were eyesight change (33.6%), glasses’ damage (27.9%), old design (18.9%) and so on. The glasses’ material used currently is was 50.5% of metal and 25.7% of plastic, showing that metal frames were used more than plastic frames. The reasons for choosing such glasses frames were ‘suitable for face type’ (33.3%), fashion trend (29.7%) and so on. The satisfaction of the respondents was examined. In the case of plastic frames, users were satisfied with price (M = 3.52), weight (M = 3.37) and design (M = 3.36). Gliding (M = 2.91) was the lowest. On the other hand, in the case of metal frames, users were most satisfied with the design (M = 3.80) and satisfied with the order of comfort and weight. Deformation is the lowest satisfaction. For wearer satisfaction, fitting and adjusting according to material should be important. Women tend to follow more fashion and design trends than men (t = −2.989, p<.01). Those who prefer metal frame tends to be more susceptible to trends such as fashion and design than those who prefer plastic one (F = 8.556, P<.001). Conclusions: The satisfaction of the male wearer according to the frame material did not show much difference between the preference of metal frame and plastic frame. On the other hand, women prefer metal frames because they are sensitive to fashionable materials and designs. As the desire of consumers changes according to the fashion, the opticians should fit using the material characteristics so as to satisfy the satisfaction of the wearer, and consider the marketing related to the design.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김인규, "인구 사회학적 특성에 따른 안경구매자의 구매결정요소 비교" 한국안광학회 17 (17): 107-117, 2012

      2 조윤실, "안경원의 서비스품질에 관한 연구" 한국안광학회 21 (21): 307-315, 2016

      3 이해성, "셀룰로오스 아세테이트 안경테 판재에 관한 연구" 한국안광학회 16 (16): 13-19, 2011

      4 이지영, "대구지역 20대 안경 소비자와 안경광학과 학생간의 구매 성향에 대한 비교 연구" 대한시과학회 12 (12): 255-264, 2010

      5 서호근, "고분자 안경테의 온도에 의한 기계적 물성 변화 분석" 한국안광학회 19 (19): 429-434, 2014

      6 문병연, "검안렌즈의 굴절력 비교 분석" 한국안광학회 17 (17): 321-334, 2012

      7 Korean Optometric Association, "Gallup Korea : Survey on the use of glasses and contact lenses nationwide in 2017" 387 : 64-68, 2017

      8 Shin SY, "Fashion glasses : Marketing service activation strategy to intensify the product in on-line environment" 20 (20): 138-143, 2015

      9 Sakurada I, "Experimental determination of the elastic modulus of crystalline regions in oriented polymers" 57 (57): 651-660, 1962

      10 Jung SH, "A study on the retailing marketing for customer service-Focused on the customer satisfaction of optician`s shop-" 8 (8): 21-31, 2005

      1 김인규, "인구 사회학적 특성에 따른 안경구매자의 구매결정요소 비교" 한국안광학회 17 (17): 107-117, 2012

      2 조윤실, "안경원의 서비스품질에 관한 연구" 한국안광학회 21 (21): 307-315, 2016

      3 이해성, "셀룰로오스 아세테이트 안경테 판재에 관한 연구" 한국안광학회 16 (16): 13-19, 2011

      4 이지영, "대구지역 20대 안경 소비자와 안경광학과 학생간의 구매 성향에 대한 비교 연구" 대한시과학회 12 (12): 255-264, 2010

      5 서호근, "고분자 안경테의 온도에 의한 기계적 물성 변화 분석" 한국안광학회 19 (19): 429-434, 2014

      6 문병연, "검안렌즈의 굴절력 비교 분석" 한국안광학회 17 (17): 321-334, 2012

      7 Korean Optometric Association, "Gallup Korea : Survey on the use of glasses and contact lenses nationwide in 2017" 387 : 64-68, 2017

      8 Shin SY, "Fashion glasses : Marketing service activation strategy to intensify the product in on-line environment" 20 (20): 138-143, 2015

      9 Sakurada I, "Experimental determination of the elastic modulus of crystalline regions in oriented polymers" 57 (57): 651-660, 1962

      10 Jung SH, "A study on the retailing marketing for customer service-Focused on the customer satisfaction of optician`s shop-" 8 (8): 21-31, 2005

      11 Kim SY, "A study on eyewear featured in fashion collections" 14 (14): 85-100, 2014

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-17 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Ophalmic Optics Society -> The Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.62 0.62 0.53
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.58 0.58 0.691 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼