전통 산수화 시각법의 교육적 활용에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Traditional Landscape Perspective and Its Implications for Traditional Art Education

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Traditional perspective shown in traditional landscape expresses well Korean's ideological background and the concept of art. This study aims to uncover the implications for current ways of teaching traditional art education and to search the possibility of teaching Korean art based on an in-depth understanding of the philosophy and aesthetics of Korean tradition.
This study focused on the traditional idea of traditional perspective based on the traditional landscape. The two elements of traditional landscape and perspective, the spiritual element and the aesthetic element, will be analyzed on how they can be applied to traditional art education. The spiritual element of traditional perspective contains traditional naturalism, the theory of the boundaries of landscape, and the theory of Do in landscape will be examined and the educational value will be extracted. The Orient strived for harmony with nature and thought landscape not only as simple topography but as a spiritual place. Furthermore, people used nature to cleanse their minds. From the aesthetic element, I will be exploring the bird-eye view, reverse perspective, and the viewing method of the 4th dimension and look upon how these aspects can be used in traditional art education. The bird-eye view is a viewing method of looking down from the sky, while inverse perspective is a method of showing closer things to be smaller, where the size of objects can be subjective to the artist. The viewing method of the 4th dimension is a method that includes time within space when looking at the object. With this understanding as a backdrop I propose ways of using this in education. Through a thorough understanding of traditional perspective I suggest creative education that allows one to look at objects at multiple perspectives and an education on the abstract that allows one to stay aware of relationships. Through this study I expect to expand an understanding of traditional art and bring diverse changes to traditional art education.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 안휘준, "한국의 미술가" 사회평론 2006

2 오주석, "한국의 미 특강" 솔출판사 2003

3 박용숙, "한국미술론" 일지사 1983

4 김선영, "평담사상과 수묵담채화에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2013

5 연혜경, "중학교 미술" (주)천재교과서 2012

6 이주연, "중학교 미술" 금성출판사 2012

7 강관식, "중국회화이론사" 미진사 1989

8 유곤, "중국화론유편" 인민미술출판사 1956

9 장언원, "중국화론선집" 미술문화 2002

10 조성을, "중국사상개론" 이론과 실천 1987

11 이택후, "중국미학사" 대한민국교과서주식회사 1992

12 김병종, "중국 회화 연구" 서울대학교 출판부 1989

13 원금탑, "중·서 회화구도비교 연구" 예서원 2004

14 홍선표, "조선시대 회화사론" 문예출판사 1999

15 김선영, "조선시대 화조화의 담채법에 관한 연구" 42 : 143-163, 2012

16 박선혜, "전통미술문화교육 방안연구" 한국조형교육학회 (23) : 35-60, 2004

17 김선아, "전통미술교육에서 그림자놀이의 미학적 의미와 활용방안" 한국조형교육학회 (44) : 45-64, 2012

18 곽희(郭熙), "임천고치" 열화당 1990

19 이광수, "의경의 의미와 표현에 대한 연구 : 전통수묵화와 본인의 작품을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2011

20 조요한, "예술철학" 미술문화 2003

21 황연주, "예술 교육론" 아카데미프레스 2007

22 Eisner, E. W., "새로운 눈으로 보는 미술교육" 예경 1998

23 장지성, "삼원법(三遠法)에 대한 재고찰 - 중등학교 미술 교과서를 중심으로 -" 한국초등미술교육학회 33 (33): 221-239, 2012

24 Efland, A. D., "미술교육의 역사" 예경 1996

25 김명진, "동과 서" 예담 2008

26 金基珠, "中國 山水畵의 起源에 관한 硏究" 東國大學校 大學院 1993