RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    의결권 자문회사에 관한 입법 과제와 법적 쟁점 = The Role and the Regulation of Proxy Advisors

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Proxy advisors such as US Institutional Shareholder Service (ISS) and Korean Corporate Governance Service (CGS) provide purportedly independent proxy research and voting advice to pensions and other institutional investors. They have been powerful players in corporate governance world and play an increasingly important role in shareholders’ meetings, since many institutional investors employ the services of proxy advisors to analyze and make voting recommendations in exercising their voting rights. The rise of proxy advisors has attracted the attention of corporate academics and regulators. This paper proceeds as follows. Part II. analyses the reason for growing importance of the proxy advisors, and overviews the market for proxy advisory industry. Part III. then considers criticism and concerns about the proxy advisors including the problem from an agency theory perspective, conflict of interests, proxy advisors’ potential influence on proxy vote, poor responsibility to their clients, and regulatory vacuum. Part IV. discusses whether and how to regulate the proxy advisors focusing on recent international reform proposals in European Union, Germany, and US, and reviewing various approaches to possible regulation. Finally, Part V. examines two important issues: proxy advisors’ potential liability for false voting recommendations, and whether the proxy advisor and its co-clients are required to disclose their shareholdings (5% rule).
    번역하기

    Proxy advisors such as US Institutional Shareholder Service (ISS) and Korean Corporate Governance Service (CGS) provide purportedly independent proxy research and voting advice to pensions and other institutional investors. They have been powerful pla...

    Proxy advisors such as US Institutional Shareholder Service (ISS) and Korean Corporate Governance Service (CGS) provide purportedly independent proxy research and voting advice to pensions and other institutional investors. They have been powerful players in corporate governance world and play an increasingly important role in shareholders’ meetings, since many institutional investors employ the services of proxy advisors to analyze and make voting recommendations in exercising their voting rights. The rise of proxy advisors has attracted the attention of corporate academics and regulators. This paper proceeds as follows. Part II. analyses the reason for growing importance of the proxy advisors, and overviews the market for proxy advisory industry. Part III. then considers criticism and concerns about the proxy advisors including the problem from an agency theory perspective, conflict of interests, proxy advisors’ potential influence on proxy vote, poor responsibility to their clients, and regulatory vacuum. Part IV. discusses whether and how to regulate the proxy advisors focusing on recent international reform proposals in European Union, Germany, and US, and reviewing various approaches to possible regulation. Finally, Part V. examines two important issues: proxy advisors’ potential liability for false voting recommendations, and whether the proxy advisor and its co-clients are required to disclose their shareholdings (5% rule).

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김건식, "회사법의 해부" 소화 2014

    2 이철송, "회사법강의" 박영사 2016

    3 김건식, "회사법" 박영사 2016

    4 권기범, "현대회사법론" 삼지원 2012

    5 노혁준, "합병비율의 불공정성과 소수주주 보호- 유기적 제도설계를 향하여 -" 한국경영법률학회 26 (26): 87-138, 2016

    6 한국상사법학회, "주식회사법대계 II" 법문사 2013

    7 김정연, "자본시장에서의 이익충돌에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 2016

    8 김건식, "자본시장법" 두성사 2013

    9 임재연, "자본시장법" 박영사 2015

    10 염미경, "의결권행사자문회사의 문제점과 법적규제 동향" 비교법학연구소 41 : 687-720, 2014

    1 김건식, "회사법의 해부" 소화 2014

    2 이철송, "회사법강의" 박영사 2016

    3 김건식, "회사법" 박영사 2016

    4 권기범, "현대회사법론" 삼지원 2012

    5 노혁준, "합병비율의 불공정성과 소수주주 보호- 유기적 제도설계를 향하여 -" 한국경영법률학회 26 (26): 87-138, 2016

    6 한국상사법학회, "주식회사법대계 II" 법문사 2013

    7 김정연, "자본시장에서의 이익충돌에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 2016

    8 김건식, "자본시장법" 두성사 2013

    9 임재연, "자본시장법" 박영사 2015

    10 염미경, "의결권행사자문회사의 문제점과 법적규제 동향" 비교법학연구소 41 : 687-720, 2014

    11 김순석, "의결권행사 자문회사의 활용 및 규제" 한국증권법학회 16 (16): 91-133, 2015

    12 곽관훈, "의결권행사 자문회사의 육성 필요성 및 법적 과제" 한국경제법학회 13 (13): 223-242, 2014

    13 안수현, "의결권행사 자문기관(Proxy Advisor Firm)에 대한 국제적인 규제움직임과 시사점" 한국경영법률학회 23 (23): 1-33, 2013

    14 장정애, "우리나라 기관투자자의 의결권 행사에 관한 소고" 한국경영법률학회 23 (23): 71-103, 2013

    15 최문희, "연기금 등 기관투자자의 의결권 자문서비스 이용과 관련된 법적 쟁점" 서울대학교 금융법센터 (77) : 2016

    16 김화진, "삼성물산과 제일모직의 합병 - 대상결정: 서울고등법원 2015.7.16.자 2015라20485(총회소집통지 및 결의금지등 가처분) 및 2015라20503(주식처분금지가처분) 결정-" 법무부 (72) : 179-196, 2015

    17 이상훈, "삼성물산 합병을 통해 바라본 주주이익 보호의 문제점과 개선방향 - 에버랜드의 재림(再臨), 그 극복을 위한 제언 -" 한국상사법학회 34 (34): 119-166, 2015

    18 김건식, "삼성물산 합병 사례를 통해 본 우리 기업지배구조의 과제-법, 제도, 문화" 서울대학교 금융법센터 (74) : 2015

    19 최문희, "기관투자자의 의결권 행사의 개선과 의결권 자문회사의 활용" 한국경제법학회 7 (7): 135-170, 2008

    20 박훤일, "글로벌 금융위기로 대두된 신용평가회사 이해상충 문제의 해결방안" 한국증권법학회 12 (12): 111-143, 2011

    21 尾崎悠一, "会社⋅金融⋅法[上卷]" 商事法務 2013

    22 박준, "[좌담회] 삼성물산 합병의 회사법적 쟁점" 서울대학교 금융법센터 (74) : 2015

    23 Fleischer, Holger, "Zur Rolle und Regulierung von Stimmrechtsberatern (Proxy Advisors) im deutschen und europäischen Aktien- und Kapiatalrecht" AG 2-, 2012

    24 Fleischer, Holger, "Zukunftsfragen der Corporate Governance" ZGR 155-, 2011

    25 Choi, Stephen, "Who Calls the Shots? How Mutual Funds Vote on Director Elections" 3 : 36-, 2013

    26 Assmann, Heinz-Dieter, "Wertpapierhandelsgesetz" Otto Schmidt 2006

    27 Hellgardt, Alexander, "Transatlantische Konvergenz der Aktionärsrechte" ZGR 38-, 2011

    28 Strine, Jr., Leo E, "Toward A True Corporate Republic: A Traditionalist Response to Bebchuk’s Solution For Improving Corporate America" 119 : 1759-, 2006

    29 OECD, "The Role of Institutional Investors in Promoting Good Corporate Governance" 2011

    30 Belinfanti, Tamara C, "The Proxy Advisory and Corporate Governance Industry" 14 : 384-, 2009

    31 Choi, Stephen J, "The Power of Proxy Advisors: Myth or Reality" 59 : 869-, 2010

    32 Kay, John, "The Kay Review of UK Equity Markets and Long-Term Decision Making: Final Report" 2012

    33 Strine, Jr., Leo E, "The Delaware Way: How We Do Corporate Law and Some of the New Challenges We (and Europe) Face" 30 : 673-, 2005

    34 Rose, Paul, "The Corporate Governance Industry" 32 : 103-, 2007

    35 Kalss, Susanne, "Stimmrechtsberater ans Licht oder an die Kandare" EuZW 2014

    36 Larcker, David F, "Stanford Closer Look Series" 2013

    37 Dubois, Edouard, "Shareholders’ General Meetings and The Role of Proxy Advisors in France and Japan" Kyushu University 2012 (2012): 2012

    38 Edelman, Paul H, "Shareholder Voting in an Age of Intermediary Capitalism" 87 : 1359-, 2014

    39 U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), "Report to Congressional Requesters - Corporate Shareholder Meetings: Issues Relating to Firms That Advise Institutional Investors on Proxy Voting" 2007

    40 Kuhla, Tilmann, "Regulierung institutioneller Stimmrechtberater" Tectum Verlag 2014

    41 Habersack, Mathias, "Rechtsfragen des Emittenten-Ratings" 169 : 185-, 2005

    42 Fleischer, Holger, "Proxy Advisors in Europe: Reform Proposals and Regulatory Strategies" 9 (9): 2012

    43 European Parliament and the Council, "Proposal for a DIRECTIVE amending Directive 2007/36/EC as regards the encouragement of long-term shareholder engagement and Directive 2013/34/EU as regards certain elements of the corporate governance statement. COM/2014/0213 final-2014/0121 (COD)"

    44 Larcker, David F, "Outsourcing Shareholder Voting to Proxy Advisory Firms" 58 : 173-, 2015

    45 Goette, Wulf, "Münchener Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz" C.H.Beck 2016

    46 Kocher, Dirk, "Kein Abgestimmtes Verhalten und kein Stimmrechtsausschluss durch Stimmrechtsempfehlungen institutioneller Stimmrechtsberater" AG 543-, 2011

    47 Schneider, Uwe H, "Institutionelle Stimmrechtsberatung und Stimmrechtsvertretung - A quiet guru’s enormous clout" NZG 88.-, 2007

    48 Schwarz, Philip, "Institutionelle Stimmrechtsberatung" Duncker & Humblot 2013

    49 Rose, James F, "ISS Recommendations and Mutual Fund Voting on Proxy Proposals" 55 : 56-, 2010

    50 Choi, Stephen J, "How to Fix Wall Street: A Voucher Financing Proposal for Securities Intermediaries" 113 : 269-, 2003

    51 European Commission, "Green Paper - the EU Corporate Governance Framework" 2011

    52 Briggs, Thomas W, "Governance and the New Hedge Fund Activism" (Summer) : 2007

    53 OECD, "G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance" OECD Publishing 2015

    54 ESMA, "Final Report and Feedback Statement on the Consultation Regarding the Role of the Proxy Advisory Industry" 2013

    55 Seibert, Ulrich, "Festschrift für Michael Hoffmann-Becking zum 70. Geburtstag" 2013

    56 Langenbucher, Katja, "Festschrift für Michael Hoffmann-Becking zum 70. Geburtstag" 2013

    57 Hopt, Klaus J, "Europäisches Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW)" 401-, 2014

    58 Hopt, Klaus J, "Europäisches Gesellschaftsrecht im Lichte des Aktionsplans der Europäischen Kommission vom Dezember 2012" ZGR 165-, 2013

    59 Choi, Stephen J, "Director Elections and the Role of Proxy Advisors" 82 : 649-, 2009

    60 Klöhn, Lars, "Die Regulierung institutioneller Stimmrechtsberater" ZIP 149-, 2012

    61 Wünschmann, Jan, "Die Haftung und die Regulierung von institutionellen Stimmrechtsberatern" Nomos 2015

    62 Zetzsche, Dirk, "Der Verhaltenskodex für Stimmberater zwischen Vertrags- und Wettbewerbsrecht" AG 685-, 2014

    63 Bachmann, Gregor, "Der Europäische Corporate Governance-Rahmen - Zum Grünbuch 2011 der Europäischen Kommission" WM 1301-, 2011

    64 Wilsing, Hans-Ulrich, "Corporate Governance in Deutschland und Europa" ZGR 291-, 2012

    65 Bruner, Christopher M, "Corporate Governance Reform in a Time of Crisis" 36 : 309-, 2011

    66 Bruner, Christopher M, "Conceptions of Corporate Purpose in Post-Crisis Financial Firms" 36 : 527-, 2013

    67 Vaupel, Christoph F, "Ansprüche von Aktiengesellschaften gegen Stimmrechtsempfehlungen institutioneller Stimmrechtsberater" AG 2011

    68 Verdam, Albert, "An Exploration of the Role of Proxy Advisors in Proxy Voting"

    69 Casper, Mathias, "Acting in Concert, Grundlagen eines neuen kapitalmarktrechtlichen Zurechnungstatbestandes" ZIP 1469-, 2003

    70 Pentz, Andreas, "Acting in Concert, Ausgewählte Einzelprobleme zur Zurechnung und zu den Rechtsfolgen" ZIP 1478-, 2003

    71 Dent, Jr., George W, "A Defense of Prozy Advisors" 2014 : 1287-, 2014

    72 上野直子, "2016年グラス⋅ルイス議決権行使助言方針と日本のコーポレート⋅ガバナンス改革" (2094) : 2016

    73 石田猛行, "2016年ISS議決権行使助言方針-背景にある考え方-" (2093) : 2016

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.55 1.55 1.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.24 1.24 1.583 0.32
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼